Skip to main content
Log in

After The Fall: Stock Price Movements and the Deterrent Effect of Antitrust Enforcement

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we utilize data on stock price movements of firms indicted on price-fixing charges to infer expectations of antitrust recidivism. Specifically, a return of the firm's (market-adjusted) asset value to its pre-indictment level in the post-indictment period is taken as evidence of stockholders' expectations of a return to collusive behavior. From these data, we are able to make direct inferences about the effectiveness of antitrust enforcement actions. Importantly, we find that the stock prices of 85 percent of the firms in our sample had regained 100 percent of their pre-indictment levels within one year of the antitrust action. Such widespread and rapid stock price appreciation casts doubt on the durability of thedeterrent effect of Section 1 enforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block, M. K., F. C. Nold, and J. G. Sidak (1981) ‘The Deterrent Effect of Antitrust Enforcement’, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 429–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, J.-C., and E. W. Eckard, Jr. (1991) ‘The Profitability of Price Fixing: Evidence from Stock Market Reaction to Federal Indictments’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraas, A. G., and D. F. Greer (1977) ‘Market Structure and Price Collusion: An Empirical Analysis’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 26, 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, G. A., and D. Kelley (1974) ‘An Empirical Study of Price Fixing Conspiracies’, Journal of Law and Economics, 17, 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, J. M. (1989) ‘The Effect of Firm Organizational Structure on Incentives to Engage in Price Fixing’, Contemporary Policy Issues, 7, 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, C. M. (1988) ‘Is Antitrust Enforcement Effective?’, Journal of Political Economy, 96, 1315–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. (1972) ‘Some Economic Conditions Conducive to Collusion’, Journal of Economic Issues, 6, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. (1970) ‘A Statistical Study of Antitrust Enforcement’, Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 365–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1964) ‘A Theory of Oligopoly’, Journal of Political Economy, 72, 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, J.S., Kaserman, D.L. After The Fall: Stock Price Movements and the Deterrent Effect of Antitrust Enforcement. Review of Industrial Organization 19, 329–334 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011851917409

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011851917409

Navigation