Skip to main content
Log in

Confidence Bands for the Difference of Two Survival Curves Under Proportional Hazards Model

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common approach to testing for differences between the survival rates of two therapies is to use a proportional hazards regression model which allows for an adjustment of the two survival functions for any imbalance in prognostic factors in the comparison. When the relative risk of one treatment to the other is not constant over time the question of which therapy has a survival advantage is difficult to determine from the Cox model. An alternative approach to this problem is to plot the difference between the two predicted survival functions with a confidence band that provides information about when these two treatments differ. Such a band will depend on the covariate values of a given patient. In this paper we show how to construct a confidence band for the difference of two survival functions based on the proportional hazards model. A simulation approach is used to generate the bands. This approach is used to compare the survival probabilities of chemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplants for chronic leukemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • O. O. Aalen, “A linear regression model for the analysis of life times,” Statistics in Medicine vol. 8 pp. 907-925, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. K. Andersen, “Testing goodness of fit of Cox's regression and life mode,” Biometrics vol. 38 pp. 67-77, 1982. Correction: vol. 40 pp. 1217, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. K. Andersen, O. Borgan, R. D. Gill, and N. Keiding, Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes, Spring-Verlag, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. K. Andersen and R. D. Gill, “Cox's regression model for counting processes: a large sample study,” The Annual of Statistics vol. 10 pp. 1100-1120, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. A. Arjas, “Graphical method for assessing goodness of fit in Cox's proportional hazards model,” Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 83 pp. 204-212, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Breslow, “Analysis of survival data under the proportional hazards model,” International Statistical Review vol. 43 pp. 45-58, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. R. Cox, “Regression models and life tables (with discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B vol. 34 pp. 187-220, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Dabrowska, K. A. Doksum, and J-K. Song, “Graphical comparison of cumulative hazards for two populations,” Biometrika vol. 76 pp. 763-773, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Dabrowska, K. A. Doksum, N. J. Feduska, R. Husing and P. Neville, “Methods for comparing cumulative hazard functions in a semi-proportional hazard model,” Statistics in Medicine vol. 11 pp. 1465-1476, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. B. Gale, R. Helmann, M. J. Zhang, J. Hasford, J. M. Goldman, H. Heimpel, J. P. Klein, H. J. Kolb, P. B. McGlave, J. R. Passweg, P. A. Rowlings, K. A. Sobocinski, M. M. Horowitz, and the German CML Study Group, “Survival with bone marrow transplantation versus hydroxyurea or interferon for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML),” Blood vol. 91 pp. 1810-1819, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. L. Kaplan and P. Meier, “Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 53 pp. 457-481, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Klein and M. J. Zhang, “Statistical challenges in comparing chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation as a treatment for leukemia,” in Lifetime Data: Models in Reliability and Survival Analysis, (N. P. Jewell et al., eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, 1996, pp. 175-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. L. Lai and Z. Ying, “Estimating a distribution function with truncated and censored data,” The Annual of Statistics vol. 19 pp. 417-442, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Y. Lin, “Goodness of fit for the Cox regression model based on a class of parameter estimators,” Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 86 pp. 725-728, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Y. Lin, T. R. Fleming and L. J. Wei, “Confidence bands for survival curves under the proportional hazards model,” Biometrika vol. 81 pp. 73-81, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. I. Parzen, L. J. Wei and Z. Ying, “Simultaneous confidence intervals for the difference of two survival functions,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics vol. 24 pp. 309-314, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. J. Wei, “Testing goodness-of-fit for the proportional hazards model with censored observations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 79 pp. 649-652, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Woodroofe, “Estimating a distribution function with truncated data,” The Annual of Statistics vol. 13 pp. 163-177, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, MJ., Klein, J.P. Confidence Bands for the Difference of Two Survival Curves Under Proportional Hazards Model. Lifetime Data Anal 7, 243–254 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011636407958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011636407958

Navigation