Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating Lifetime and Age-Conditional Probabilities of Developing Cancer

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lifetime and age-conditional risk estimates of developing cancer provide a useful summary to the public of the current cancer risk and how this risk compares with earlier periods and among select subgroups of society. These reported estimates, commonly quoted in the popular press, have the potential to promote early detection efforts, to increase cancer awareness, and to serve as an aid in study planning. However, they can also be easily misunderstood and frightening to the general public. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society have recently begun including in annual reports lifetime and age-conditional risk estimates of developing cancer. These risk estimates are based on incidence rates that reflect new cases of the cancer in a population free of the cancer. To compute these estimates involves a cancer prevalence adjustment that is computed cross-sectionally from current incidence and mortality data derived within a multiple decrement life table. This paper presents a detailed description of the methodology for deriving lifetime and age-conditional risk estimates of developing cancer. In addition, an extension is made which, using a triple decrement life table, adjusts for a surgical procedure that removes individuals from the risk of developing a given cancer. Two important results which provide insights into the basic methodology are included in the discussion. First, the lifetime risk estimate does not depend on the cancer prevalence adjustment, although this is not the case for age-conditional risk estimates. Second, the lifetime risk estimate is always smaller when it is corrected for a surgical procedure that takes people out of the risk pool to develop the cancer. The methodology is applied to corpus and uterus NOS cancers, with a correction made for hysterectomy prevalence. The interpretation and limitations of risk estimates are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. P. Bender, J. Punyko, A. N. Williams, and S. A. Bushhouse, “A standard person-years approach to estimating lifetime cancer risk. The section of chronic disease and environmental epidemiology, Minnesota Department of Health,” Cancer Causes Controlvol. 3 pp. 69–75, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Blakeslee, “Faulty math heightens fears of breast cancer,” The New York Times, March 15, 1992, Section 4, pp. 1,6.

  • B. W. Brown, C. Brauner, and M. C. Minnote, “Noncancer deaths in white adult cancer patients,” J Natl Cancer Instvol. 85 pp. 979–987, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. C. Chiang, “On constructing current life tables,” J Amer Statist Assocvol. 67 pp. 538–541, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. R. Connelly, P. C. Campbell, and H. Eisenberg “Central registry of cancer cases in Connecticut,” Public Health Rep. vol. 83 pp. 386–390, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Elandt-Johnson and N. L. Johnson, Survival Models and Data Analysis, John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1980, p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Feldman, L. Kessler, M. H. Myers, and M. D. Naughton, “The prevalence of cancer: Estimates based on the Connecticut tumor registry,” N Engl J Medvol. 315 pp. 1394–1397, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. J. Feuer, L. M. Wun, and C. C. Boring, “Probability of developing cancer,” in B. A. Miller, L. A. G. Ries, B. R. Hankey et al. (eds). Cancer Statistics Review: 1973–1989, National Cancer Institute, NIH Pub. No nu92–2789, 1992, XXX.1–8.

  • E. J. Feuer, L. M. Wun, C. C. Boring, et al., ”The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer,” J Natl Cancer Instvol. 85 pp. 892–897, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. J. Feuer and L. M. Wun, “DEVCAN: Probability of DEVeloping CANcer software,” version 3.11, National Cancer Institute, 1994.

  • M.H. Gail, “A review and critique of some models used in competing risk analysis,” Biometricsvol. 31 pp. 209–222, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. H. Gail, L. A. Brinton, D. P. Byar, D. K. Corle, S. B. Green, C. Schairer and J. J. Mulvihill, “Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually,” J Natl Cancer Instvol. 81 pp. 1879–1886, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. D. Goldberg, M. L. Levin, P. R. Gerhardt, V. H. Handy and R. E. Cashman, “The probability of developing cancer,” J Natl Cancer Instvol. 17 pp. 155–173, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. J. Graves, “National hospital discharge survey: Annual summary. 1990,” DHHS publication no. (PHS) 92–1773. (Vital and health statistics 13, no. 112). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Kramer, M. Von Korff and L. Kessler, ”The lifetime prevalence of mental disorders: Estimation, uses and limitations,” Psychol Medvol. 10 pp. 429–435, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Lyon and J. W. Gardner, “The rising frequency of hysterectomy: Its effect on uterine cancer rates,” Am J Epidemiolvol. 105 pp. 439–443, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Pokras, “Hysterectomy, past, present, and future,” Stat Bull Metrop Insur Covol. 70 pp. 12–21, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Merrill and E. J. Feuer, “Risk-adjusted cancer incidence rates,” Cancer Causes Controlvol. 7 pp. 553–561, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • One in nine. Washington Post, March 17, 1992, Section A, p. 16.

  • L. A. G. Ries, C. L. Kosary, B. F. Hankey, B. A. Miller, A. Harras, and B. K. Edwards (eds.), SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1994: Tables and Graphs, NIH Pub. No. 97–2789, Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Schwab, “Breast cancer challenge sounded at Capitol,” J Natl Cancer Instvol. 83 p. 914, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Seidman, E. Silverberg and A. Bodden, ”Probabilities of eventually developing and dying of cancer (Risk among persons previously undiagnosed with cancer),” CA Cancer J Clinvol. 28 pp. 33–46, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. L. Parker, T. Tong, S. Bolden and P. A. Wingo, “Cancer statistics, 1997,” CA Cancer J Clinvol. 47 pp. 5–27, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Zdeb, ”The probability of developing cancer,” Am J Epidemiolvol. 106 pp. 6–16, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wun, LM., Merrill, R.M. & Feuer, E.J. Estimating Lifetime and Age-Conditional Probabilities of Developing Cancer. Lifetime Data Anal 4, 169–186 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009685507602

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009685507602

Navigation