Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adapting the Jalowiec coping scale in Norwegian adult psoriasis patients

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to adapt the Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS) to accommodate adult patients with psoriasis. The sample comprised 334 patients who were treated consecutively at three dermatology departments in the eastern Norway. A total number of 273 hospitalised patients (20) and out-patients (80) completed the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 82. The study assessed the reliability and the face, content and construct validity of the Norwegian version of the JCS. In addition, researchers investigated the most frequently used/effective coping strategies, the relationships between demographic/clinical variables, self-reported physical symptoms and the use of coping strategies. The results (correlational coefficients and interitem αs) indicated that there was an overlap in substantive content among the original JCS' subscales, due either to measurement error (bias or response style) and/or because the patients in the present study were in a demanding situation in relation to their disease, which may have activated a variety of coping strategies. A factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution (confrontive problem-solving, normalising/optimistic and combined emotive) with satisfactory internal consistency. This factor solution comprised 31 items with an explained variance of 37 of the total pool of items. The most frequently used and effective coping strategies could be labelled as emotion-focused (optimistic/maintain control). Significant correlations were found between age, hospital setting, self-reported physical symptoms and different coping subscales. However, further studies are needed to assess the validity and reliability of the JCS among different population groups in Norway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pearlin L, Schooler C. The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 1978; 19: 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Billings AG, Moos RH. The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. Journal of Behavioural Medicine 1981; 4: 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McCrae RR. Situational determinants of coping re-sponses: Loss, threat, and challenge. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology 1984; 46: 919–928.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carver CS, Sceier MF, Weintraib JK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989; 56: 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lazarus RS. Psychological stress and the coping pro-cess. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lazarus RS. Emotion & Adaptation. Oxford Uni-versity Press, 1991.

  8. Jalowiec A, Murphy SP, Powers MDI. Psychometric assessment of the Jalowiec coping scale. Nursing Re-search 1984; 33: 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vitaliano PP, Russo J, Carr JE, Maiuro RD, Becker J. The Ways of Coping Checklist: Revision and Psycho-metric Properties. Multivariate Behavioural Research 1985; 20: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor DE, Buckwalter KC. Coping with psoriasis and its psychosocial consequences. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 1988; 2: 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jalowiec A. Psychometric results on the 1987 Jalowiec coping scale. School of Nursing. Chicago, IL: Loyola University of Chicago, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kalfoss MH. Psychological stress and coping in hos-pitalised chronically ill elderly. Doctoral thesis. The Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, 1994.

  13. Gotlieb BH, ed, Coping with chronic stress. New York: Plenum Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jalowiec A. Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS). Cinahl database, 1998.

  15. Guillemin EG, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-culture adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epi-demiol 1993; 46: 1417–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research. Principles and methods. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. In Sullivan JL, ed, Quantitative applica-tions in the social sciences. London: Sage University Papers, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Viney LL, Westbrook MT. Coping with chronic illness: Strategy preferences, changes in preferences and asso-ciated emotional reactions. Journal of Chronic Disease 1984; 37: 489–502.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gulick EE. Coping among spouses or significant others of persons with multiple sclerosis. Nursing Research 1995; 44: 220–225.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wiko. R, Miller P. Analyses of the Jalowiec Scale with cardiac patients' spouses. Nursing Research 1989; 38: 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lambert VA et al. Social support, hardiness and psy-chological well-being in women with arthritis. Image: J Nurs Scholarship 1989; 21: 128–131.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Northouse L. A longitudinal study of adjustment of patients and husbands to breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1989; 16: 511–516.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lindqvist R, Sjoden P.O. Coping strategies and quality of life among patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialyseis (CAPD). J Adv Nurs 1998; 27: 312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chiou A, Potempa K, Buschmann MB. Anxiety, de-pression and coping methods of hospitalized patients with myocardial infarction in Taiwan. Int J Nurs Stud 1997; 32: 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Trimm D. Spousal coping during surgical wait. J Per-ianesth Nurs 1997; 12: 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cronqvist A, Klang B, Bjorvell H. The use and efficacy of coping strategies and coping styles in a Swedish sample. Qual Life Res. 1997; 6: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steele RG, Fitch MI. Coping strategies of family caregivers of home hospice patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1996; 23: 955–960.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Blanchard-Fields F, Robinson SL. Age differences in relation between controllability and coping. J Gerontol 1987; 42: 497–501.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Christman NJ. Uncertainty, coping, and distress fol-lowing myocardial infarction: Transition from hospital to home. Research in Nursing & Health 1988; 11: 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Felton BJ, Revenson TA.Coping with chronic illness: A study of illness controllability and the infiuence of coping strategies on psychological adjustment. J Con-sult Clin Psychol 1984; 52: 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Felton BJ, Revenson TA, Hinrichsen A. Stress and coping in the explanation of psychological adjustment among chronically ill adults. Soc Sci Med 1984; 18: 889–898.

    Google Scholar 

  32. McNett SC. Social support, threat, and coping re-sponses and e.ectiveness in the functionally disabled. Nur Res 1987; 36: 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Malt UF. Coping with accidental injury. Psychiatric Medicine 1992; 10: 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Malia K, Powell G, Torode S. Coping and psychosocial functioning after brain injury. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 607–618.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schwarzer R, Scwarzer C. A critical survey of coping instruments. In: Zeidner M, Endler NS, eds, Handbook of coping. New York: Wiley, 1996; 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Scheier MF, Weintraib JK, Carver CS. Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists. J of Personality and Social Psychol 1986; 51: 1257–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McCrae R.R. Age differences in the use of coping mechanisms. J Gerontol 1982; 37: 454–460.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Norway

    A. Wahl, T. Moum, I. Wiklund & M.H. Kalfoss

  2. Bergen College, Norway

    B.R. Hanestad

Authors
  1. A. Wahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Moum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B.R. Hanestad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Wiklund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M.H. Kalfoss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wahl, A., Moum, T., Hanestad, B. et al. Adapting the Jalowiec coping scale in Norwegian adult psoriasis patients. Qual Life Res 8, 435–445 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008995905936

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008995905936

Search

Navigation