Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecology and urban planning

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban areas harbour diverse nature ranging from semi-natural habitats to wastelands, parks and other highly human-influenced biotopes with their associated species assemblages. Maintenance of this urban biodiversity for the residents and for its intrinsic value in the face of increasing population and expanding cities requires that ecological knowledge should be better integrated into urban planning. To achieve this goal understanding of ecological patterns and processes in urban ecosystems is needed. The first step in the necessary urban ecological research is to find out what kind of nature exists in cities. Second, knowledge about ecological processes important in urban nature is required. Although ecological processes in cities are the same as in rural areas, some of them, such as invasion by alien species, are more prevalent in urban than in rural conditions. Third, based on ecological knowledge, management schemes maintaining the diversity of urban nature should be designed. These procedures should also include protection of urban nature, e.g. in urban national parks. Finally, as ecology alone cannot provide the complex information about human influence on urban ecosystems, interdisciplinary research involving natural and social sciences is imperative for a holistic approach to integrating ecology into the process of urban planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baur B (1994) Thermal radiation from a city causes extinction of a snail. Urban Nature Magazine 2: 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB and Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation 80: 113–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood E (1994) Prospects for the development of integrated regional models. In: Groffman PM and Likens GE (eds) Integrated Regional Models, pp 145–153. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin DB and Beveridge CE (1997) Cities as environments. Urban Ecosystems 1: 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Czechowski W (1982) Occurrence of carabids (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the urban greenery of Warsaw according to the land utilization and cultivation. Memorabilia Zoologica 39: 3–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis BNK (1978) Urbanisation and the diversity of insects. In: Mound L A and Waloff N (eds) Diversity of Insect Faunas. Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society of London: number nine, pp 126–138. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas I (1992) The case for urban ecology. Urban Nature Magazine 1: 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhme F and Pauleit S (1998) A landscape ecological masterplan for the city of Munich. In: Riley JO and Page SE (eds) Habitat Creation and Wildlife Conservation in Urban and Post-industrial Environments. Packard Publishing Ltd. (in press), Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Egerton FN (1993) The history and present entanglements of some general ecological perspectives. In: McDonnell MJ and Pickett STA (eds) Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas, pp 9–23. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Eversham BC, Roy DB and Telfer MG (1996) Urban industrial and other manmade sites as analogues of natural habitats for Carabidae. Annales Zoologici Fennici 33: 149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT and Godron M (1986) Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert OL (1989) The Ecology of Urban Habitats. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödde M, Richarz N and Walter B (1995) Habitat conservation and development in the city of Düsseldorf, Germany. In: Sukopp H, Numata M and Huber A (eds) Urban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning, pp 163–171. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (1995) Kestävän kehityksen luontoperusta. Mitä päättäjien tulee tietää ekologiasta? [Ecological basis for sustainable development. What decision-makers should know about ecology]. Suomen kuntaliitto. [in Finnish] Helsinki

  • Haila Y and Kouki J (1994) The phenomenon of biodiversity in conservation biology. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y and Levins R (1992) Humanity and Nature. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Halme E and Niemelä J (1993) Carabid beetles in fragments of coniferous forest. Annales Zoologici Fennici 30: 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J and Suhonen J (1993) Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison. Ornis Fennica 70: 71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausnitzer B (1993) Ökologie der Großstadtfauna. 2. Auflage.Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrynowicz M (1982) Macro-fungal flora of Lodz. In: Bornkamm R, Lee JA and Seaward MRD (eds) Urban Ecology. The Second European Ecological Symposium, pp. 41–47. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ (1997) A paradigm shift. Urban Ecosystems 1: 85–86

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ and Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71: 1232–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ and Pickett STA (1993) Introduction: scope and need for an ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas. In: McDonnell MJ and Pickett STA (eds) Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas, pp. 1–5. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA and Pouyat V (1993) The application of the ecological gradient paradigm to the study of urban effects. In: McDonnell MJ and Pickett STA (eds) Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas, pp. 175–189. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM and Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1: 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J and Halme E (1998) Effects of forest fragmentation on carabid assemblages in the urban setting: implications for planning and management. In: Breuste J, Feldmann H and Uhlmann O (eds) Urban Ecology, pp. 692–695. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J and Spence J (1991) Distribution and abundance of an exotic ground-beetle (Carabidae): a test of community impact. Oikos 62: 351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1993) Wildlife corridors. In: Smith DS and Hellmund PC (eds) Ecology of Greenways. pp 43–68. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Burch WR Jr, and Dalton SE (1997a) Integrated urban ecosystem research. Urban Ecosystems 1: 183–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Burch WR Jr, Dalton SE, Foresman TW, Grove JM and Rowntree R (1997b) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1: 185–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, McDonnell MJ, and Pickett STA (1997) Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1: 117–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Parmelee RW and Carreiro MM (1994) Environmental effects of forest soil-invertebrate and fungal densities in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. Pedobiologia 38: 385–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta P, Tanskanen A and Siitonen M (1997) Vascular plants of the city of Vantaa, S Finland - urban ecology, biodiversity and conservation. Lutukka 13: 67–87 [in Finnish with an English summary]

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebele F (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 4: 173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd P A (1994) A review of plant communities of derelict land in the city of Nottingham, England and their value for nature conservation. Memorabilia Zoologica 49: 129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence JR and Spence DH (1988) Of gound-beetles and men: introduced species and the synanthopic fauna of western Canada. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 144: 151–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H, Blume HP and Kunick W (1979) The soil, flora and vegetation of Berlin's wastelands. In: Laurie I C (ed) Nature in Cities, pp 115–132. John Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H and Numata M (1995) Foreword. In: Sukopp H, Numata M and Huber A (eds) Urban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning, p vii. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H and Weiler S (1988) Biotope mapping and nature conservation strategies in urban areas of the Federal Republic of Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 15: 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H and Wittig R (1993) Ökologische Stadtplanung. In: Sukopp H and Wittig R (eds) Stadtökologie, pp 348–373. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonteri T and Haila Y (1990) Plants in a boreal city: ecological characteristics of vegetation in Helsinki and its surroundings, southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 27: 337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepl L (1995) Towards a theory of urban biocoenoses. In: Sukopp H, Numata M and Huber A (eds) Urban Ecology as the Basis For Urban Planning, pp 3–21. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen L (1997) The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning 37: 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandruff LW, Leedy DL and Stearns FW (1995) Urban wildlife and human well-being. In: Sukopp H, Numata M and Huber A (eds) Urban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning, pp 203–211. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Walbridge MR (1997) Urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosystems 1: 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigmann G (1982) The colonization of ruderal biotopes in the city of Berlin by arthropods. In: Bornkamm R, Lee JA and Seaward MRD (eds) Urban Ecology. The Second European Ecological Symposium, pp 75–82. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig R and Sukopp H (1993) Was ist Stadtökologie? In: Sukopp H and Wittig R (eds) Stadtö kologie, pp 1–9. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig R, Sukopp H and Klausnitzer B (1993) Die ökologische Gliederung der Stadt. In: Sukopp H and Wittig R (eds) StadtoÈ kologie, pp 271–318. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 17, FIN-00014, Finland (

    Jari Niemelä

Authors
  1. Jari Niemelä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niemelä, J. Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 119–131 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008817325994

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008817325994

Search

Navigation