Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Groupware Environments as Action Constitutive Resources: A Social Action Framework for Analyzing Groupware Technologies

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) is a relatively new and dynamic field dealing with the development and use of groupware technologies in organizations. Several frameworks and models have been proposed for studying CSCW, each conveying a different perspective and theoretical basis. Although these frameworks have contributed much to our understanding of the field, they can be criticized for a lack of holistic understanding of the complex social activity that is constitutive of groupwork. This often leads to the failure of otherwise well designed CSCW applications. In this paper we take up this challenge and propose a social action framework for analyzing groupware technologies. The framework is based on Habermas's theory of social action and four action categories, and the idea that groupware applications serve as sets of rules and resources which mediate group interactions. We demonstrate the value of the framework by analyzing a wide range of existing groupware technologies for their appropriateness to specific groupwork situations in terms of their espoused or implicit assumptions of groupwork, and the action constitutive resources they provide. Our analysis points out that a host of current groupware applications can be fairly easily classified and examined by the way they are configured to support different types of social action. It also suggests that, when implementing groupware applications, developers should critically evaluate: (a) the need for supporting a rich variety of action types, (b) the possible role of computer support in the specific groupwork situations, and (c) the underlying assumptions of groupwork embedded in the groupware platform. Finally, we will discuss how the framework can inform future research and development in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boland, R. J., R. V. Tenkasi, and D. Te'eni (1994): Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition. Organization Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 456–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. M. (1992): The Conversation Builder Kernel and Applications. Ph.D. thesis University of Illinois.

  • Conklin, J. and M. L. Begeman (1988): gIBIS:AHypertext Tooling for Exploratory PolicyDiscussion. In Proceedings the ACM Conference on CSCW. New York: ACM Press, pp. 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCindio, F., G. DeMichelis, C. Simone, R. Vasslo, and A. Zanaboni (1986): CHAOS as a Coordination Technology. In Proceedings of CSCW.

  • DeSanctis, G. and M. S. Poole (1994): Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: The Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. L. G. and G. A. M. Widdershoven (1991): Speech Acts or Communicative Action. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on CSCW, pp. 235–248.

  • Durham, T. (1988): Organizational Dinosaurs Take on a Human Face. Computing, vol. 3, no. 11.

  • Ellis, C. A., S. J. Gibbs, and G. L. Rein (1988): Groupware: The Research and Development Issues. MCC Technical Report no. STP-414-88.

  • Flores, F., M. Graves, B. Hartfield, and T. Winograd (1988): Computer Systems and the Design of Organizational Interaction. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1983): Critical Theory and Organizational Analysis. In G. Morgan (ed.):Beyond Method. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1982): Know Your Organizations: Planning and the Reproduction of Social and Political Relations. Plan Canada, vol. 22, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. and M. Stefik (1986): Cognoter, Theory and Practice of Collaborative Tool. In Proceedings of the CSCW'86, pp. 7–15.

  • Frazer, N. and K. Hipel (1981): Computer Assistance in Labor Management Negotiation. Interfaces, vol. 11, pp. 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959): The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, C. K. and R. P. Cararsik (1988): Phenomenology of Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Berkeley. CA: Interpersonal Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S. (1991): Personalizable Groupware: Accomodating Individual Roles and Group Differences. In ECSCW'91 Proceedings of the 1991 European Conference on CSCW. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975): Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.): Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, I. (ed.) (1988): Computer Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1994): Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of ACM, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1991): CSCW Introduction. Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972): Knowledge and Human Interest. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984): The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Vol. I. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984): The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System, Vol. II. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. and K. Klein (1994): Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS. MIS Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H. and M. Kobayashi (1992): Clearboard: A Seamless Medium for Shared Drawing and Conversation with Eye Contact. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Computer Interaction.

  • Jarke, M., M. T. Jelassi, and M. F. Shakuni (1987): MEDIATOR: Towards a Negotiation Support System. European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 31, pp. 314–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, R. (1988): Groupware: Computer support for Business Teams. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G. (1985): NEGO-Group Decision Support System. Information and Management, vol. 8, pp. 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D. (1983): The Use of Power. In R. W. Allen and L.W. Porter (eds.): Organization Influence Process. Foresman, IL: Scott, pp. 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. (1991): Cooperation, Coordination and Control in Computer Supported Work. Communications of ACM, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, C. (1988): A Commitment-Based Communication Model for Distributed Office Environments. In Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 291–298.

  • Kunz, W. and H. Rittel (1980): Issues as Elements of Information Systems. Working Paper no. 131. Institute of Urban & Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Kuutti, K. (1991): The Concept of Activity as a Basic Unit for CSCW Research. In Proceedings of the 2nd ECSCW, pp. 249–264.

  • Kuutti, K. and T. Arvonen (1992): Identifying Potential CSCW Applications by Means of Activity Theory Concepts: A Case Example. In Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 233–240.

  • Latour, B. (1987): Science in Action: How to Follow Scientist and Engineers Through Society. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, M. D. P., R. S. Fish, and R. E. Kraut (1988): Collaborative Document Production Using Quilt. In Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 206–215.

  • Lotus (1989): Lotus Notes Users Guide. Cambridge, MA: Lotus Development Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. (1986): Information Systems Development as Social Action: Framework and Critical Implications. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.

  • Lyytinen, K. (1992): Critical Theory and Information Systems. In M. Alvesson and H. Willmott (eds.): Critical Management Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. J. and O. K. Ngwenyama (1992): What Does Computer Support for Cooperative Work Mean? A Structurational Analysis of Computer Supported CooperationsWork. Accounting Management and Information Technology, vol.2, no. 1, pp. 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K., P. Maaranen, and J. Knuuttila (1993): Unusual Business or Business as Usual: An Investigation of Meeting Support Requirements in Multilateral Diplomacy. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K., P. Maaranen, and J. Knuuttila (1994): All Groups Are Not the Same: An Analysis of Group Behaviors in Electronic Meeting Systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 261–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandviwalla, M. (1994): The Worldview of Collaborative Tools. Electronic Journal of Virtual Culture, vol. 2, no. 2. elistserv@kentvm.kent.edu

  • Mandviwalla, M. and L. Olfman (1994): The What Do Groups Need: A Proposed Set of Generic Groupware Requirements. ACM Transactions on Human Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 245–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantei, M. (1988): Capturing the Capture Lab Concepts: A Case Study in the Design of Computer Supported Meeting Environments. In CSCW'88 Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 257–270.

  • Markus, L. M. and T. Connolly (1990): Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Adoption of Interdependent Work Tools. In CSCW'90 Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 371–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matwin, S., S. Sxpakwicz, G. Kersten, and W. Michalowski (1989): NEGOPLAN: An Expert System Shell for Negotiation Support. IEEE Expert, vol. 4, pp. 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1984): Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D. K. (1988): Communication and Power: Discourse Ideology and Domination. New Jersey: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth, C. M., D. S. Kaufer, R. Chandhok, and J. H. Morris (1990): Issues in the Design of Computer Support for Co-Authoring and Commenting. In CSCW'90 Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwenyama, O. K. (1987): Fundamental Issues of Knowledge Acquisition: Toward a Human Action Perspective of Knowledge Systems. Ph.D. dissertation, Thomas J. Watson, School of Engineering, SUNY.

  • Ngwenyama, O. K. (1996a): On the Phenomenology of Group Processes: A Social Action Analysis of Software Design Meetings. Working Papers, University of Michigan Business School.

  • Ngwenyama, O. K. (1996b): Breakdowns and Innovations in Computer Mediated Work: Groupware and the Reproduction of Organizational Knowledge. Submitted for publication.

  • Ngwenyama, O. K., N. Bryson, and A. Mobolurin (1996): Supporting Facilitation in Group Support Systems: Techniques for Analyzing Consessus Relevant Data. Decision Support Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwenyama, O. K. and A. Lee. Information Richness in Electronic Communication: Critical Theory and The Contextuality of Meaning. MIS Quarterly(forthcoming).

  • Olson, G. M., J. S. Olson, M. Storrosten, M. Carter, J. Herbselb, and H. Rueter (1994): The Structure of Activity during Design Meetings. In T. P. Moran and J. M. Carroll (eds.): Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Use. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 217–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S., G. M. Olson, M. Carter, and M. Storrosten (1992): Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration. Human Computer Interaction, vol. 7, pp. 347–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S., G.M. Olson, M. Storrosten, and M. Carter (1993): Groupwork Close Up: A Comparison of the Group Design Process with and without a Simple Group Editor. ACM Transaction on Information Systems, vol. 11, pp. 321–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992): The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, vol. 3. no. 3, pp. 398–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R., J. Rohrbough, and M. McGrath (1985): Automated Decision Conferencing: How It Works. Personnel, vol. 62, pp. 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perin, C. (1991): Electronic Social Fields in Bureaucracies. Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. R. (1989): Electronic Persuasion: The Uses of Electronic Mail for Interpersonal Influence in Organizations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California.

  • Robinson, M. (1993): Designing for Unanticipated Uses. In ECSCW'93 Proceedings of Third European Conference on CSCW, 13-17 September 1993, Milan, Italy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R. and J. Pfeffer (1977): Who Gets Power and How They Hold on to It: A Strategic Contingency Model of Power. Organizational Dynamics, Winter.

  • Shepherd, A., N. Myers, and A. Kuchinsky (1990): Strudel: An Extensible Electronic Conversation Toolkit. In CSCW'90 Proceedings of the Conference on CSCW. New York: ACM Press, pp. 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K. and L. Bannon (1992): Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1989): Notes on Computer Support for Cooperative Work. WP-11, Department of Computer Science, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland.

  • Suchman, L. (1994): Do Categories Have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1947): Scientific Management. NewYork: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turoff, M. (1985): Information and Value: The Internal Information Marketplace. Journal of Technology Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 257–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983): Critical Heuristics of Social Planning. Bern: Haupt.

  • Winograd, T. (1988): A Language-Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. STANCS-87-1158, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A

    Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama

  2. Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Jyväskylä, SF-40 100, Finland

    Kalle J. Lyytinen

Authors
  1. Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kalle J. Lyytinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ngwenyama, O.K., Lyytinen, K.J. Groupware Environments as Action Constitutive Resources: A Social Action Framework for Analyzing Groupware Technologies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 6, 71–93 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008600220584

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008600220584

Search

Navigation