Skip to main content
Log in

Superstar Museums: An Economic Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Superstar museums are characterized by (1) great prominence among tourists and world fame among the general population; (2) a large number of visitors; (3) a collection of generally known painters and individual paintings; (4) an exceptional architecture; and (5) a large role of commercialization, including a substantial impact on the local economy. The superstar phenomenon is caused by factors both on the demand and the supply side of the market. Superstar museums are forced to offer “total experience” to the visitors; they have to relate to events in history, technology, politics, films and TV, and they have to provide for everything from education, food, gifts, shopping to entertainment. The development of superstar status strongly affects museum policy. The strategic orientation emphasizes visitors' demands; the organization has to be decentralized into processes each devoted to particular segments of visitors, to special exhibitions or support activities. There are also major consequences for human resource management, in particular, relating to flexibility and staff composition of paid employees and volunteers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, Moshe (1985) “Stardom and Talent”. American Economic Review 75 (March): 208–212.

  • Bayart, Denis and Benghozi, Pierre-Jean (1993) Le Tournant Commercial des Musées en France et à l'étranger. Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication. Direction de l'Administration Général. La Documentation Française, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou, Françoise (1996) L'économie de la culture. Editions La Découverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark (ed.) (1976) The Economics of the Arts. Martin Robertson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichberger, Dagmar (1996) “The Grand Louvre: A Change in Direction”. Bulletin of the Melbourne Fine Arts Society 8: 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Martin (ed.) (1991) The Economics of Art Museums. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filer, Randall K. (1986) “The ‘starving Artist’ – Myth or Reality? Earnings of Artists in the United States”. Journal of Political Economy 94: 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert H. and Cook, Philip J. (1995) The Winner-Take-All Society. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno S. (1994) “Cultural Economics and Museum Behaviour”. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 41: 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno S. and Pommerehne, Werner W. (1989) Muses and Markets: Explorations in the Economics of the Arts. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, David A. (1981) “Blockbusters: The Economics of Mass Entertainment”. Journal of Cultural Economics 5: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, Victor A. and Menger, Pierre-Michel (eds) (1996) Economics of the Arts. Selected Essays. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, James and Gray, Charles M. (1993) The Economics of Art and Culture – An American Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Harold (1983) “Work and Earnings of Artists in the Media Fields”. Journal of Cultural Economics 7: 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Peter (1995) “Cultural Economics and Museum Behaviour: A Comment”. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 42: 465–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montias, J. Michael (1973) “Are Museums Betraying the Public's Trust?” Museum News (May): 25–31. Reprinted in the Journal of Cultural Economics 19 (1995): 71–80.

  • Mossetto, Gianfranco (1992) “A Cultural Good Called Venice”. In Ruth Towse and Abdul Khakee, eds, Cultural Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (1993) Department of National Heritage, National Museums and Galleries: Quality of Service to the Public. HSMO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, John W. (1995) “National Museums: To Charge or Not to Charge?” Journal of Cultural Economics 19: 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, John W. and Duffy, Christopher (1995) “National Museums: Functions, Costs and Admission Charges”. European Journal of Cultural Policy 1: 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, Margit and Frey, Bruno S. (1998) Managing Motivation and Knowledge in the Theory of the Firm. Mimeo, Institute for Research in Business Administration and Institute for Empirical Economic Research, University of Zurich.

  • Peacock, Alan T. and Godfrey, Christine (1974) “The Economics of Museums and Galleries”. Lloyds Bank Review 111: 17–28. Reprinted in Blaug (1976), The Economics of the Arts. Martin Robertson, London: 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Sherwin (1981) “The Economics of Superstars”. American Economic Review 71: 845–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, David C. (1994) “The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics”. Journal of Economic Literature 33: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, Ruth (1991) Venice as a Superstar. Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Exeter.

  • Towse, Ruth (ed.) (1997) Cultural Economics: The Arts, the Heritage and the Media Industries. Two Volumes. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K. and Lyme, U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, Burt A. (1988) The Nonprofit Economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frey, B.S. Superstar Museums: An Economic Analysis. Journal of Cultural Economics 22, 113–125 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007501918099

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007501918099

Navigation