Skip to main content
Log in

Functional Relative Clauses

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, Filippo: 1997, ‘The Syntax of Distributivity and Pair-List Readings’, in A. Szabolesi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, 349–408.

  • Bittner, Maria: 1998, ‘Functional Answers without Construction-Specific Rules’, Linguistics and Philosophy.

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1993, ‘Questions with Quantifiers’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 181–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comorovski, Ileana: 1989, Discourse and the Syntax of Multiple Constituent Questions, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Cooper, Robin: 1978, ‘Variable Binding and Relative Clauses’, in F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Language, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, pp. 131–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Osten: 1981, ‘Binding Relations in Dislocated Constituents’, talk presented at the Sloan Workshop on Alternatives to Transformational Grammar, Stanford University.

  • Dayal (Srivastav), Venceta: 1992. ‘Two Types of Unvirsal Terms in Questions’, Proceedings of NELS 22, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, Veneeta: 1996, Locality in WH Quantification, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doron, Edit: 1982, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns’, Texas Linguistic Forum 19, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet: 1980, The Syntax and Semantics of Questions in Swedish, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussets, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet: 1986, Constituent Questions, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.: 1964, ‘Referring Expressions Again’, Analysis 24/5. Reprinted in P. Geach, Logic Matters, 1972, University of California Press.

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1984, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Academisch Proefschrift, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, C. L.: 1973, ‘Questions in Montague English’, Foundations of Language 10, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heycock, Caroline and Anthony Kroch: 1996, ‘Pseudocleft Conectivity: Implications for the LF Interface Level’, ms. University of Pennsylvania and University of Edinburgh.

  • Higginbotham, James and Robert May: 1981, ‘Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing’, The Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1994, ‘Binding Connectivity in Copular Sentences’, in M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (eds.), SALT IV.

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1996, ‘The Locality of Interpretation: The Case of Binding and Coordination’, in T. Galloway and J. Spence (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VI, CLC Publications, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartrunen, Lauri: 1977, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Questions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1992, ‘Definite NP's are not Quantifiers’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George: 1970, ‘Repartee’, Foundations of Language 6, 389–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert: 1988, ‘Ambiguities of Quantification and WH: A Reply to Williams’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike and Anna Szabolcsi: 1994, ‘Scope Interactions with Pair-list Quantifiers’, Proceedings of NELS 24.

  • Partee, Barbara: 1986, ‘Ambiguous Pseudoclefts with Unambiguous BE’, in S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, and J. McDonough (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16, 1985. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 354–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1982, Paths and Categories, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Rodman, R.: 1976, ‘Scope Phenomena, Movement Transformations', and Relative Clauses’, in B. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullman, Hotze: 1995, Maximality in the Semantics of wh-Constructions, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharvit, Yael: 1996, ‘Functional Dependencies and Indirect Binding’, in T. Galloway and J. Spence (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VI, CLC Publications, Cornell University.

  • Sharvit, Yael: 1997, The Syntax and Semantics of Functional Relative Clauses, Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.

  • Szabolcsi, Anna: 1993, ‘Quantifiers in Pair-list Questions and the Non-uniformity of Quantification’, Proceedings of the 9th Amsterdam Colloquium.

  • Szabolcsi, Anna: 1997, ‘Quantifiers in Pair-List Readings’, in A. Szaoblesi (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 311–347.

  • von Stechow, Arnim: 1990, ‘Layered Traces’, paper presented at the Conference on Logic and Language, Revfülüp, Hungary.

  • Williams, Edwin: 1986, ‘A Reassignment of the Functions of LF’, Linguistic Inquiry 17(2), 265–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1994, Thematic Structure in Syntax, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 23, The MIT Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharvit, Y. Functional Relative Clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 447–478 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005411720444

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005411720444

Keywords

Navigation