Skip to main content
Log in

Does evolution reduce the body size? A study of the four members of newly evolved nasuta‐albomicans complex of Drosophila

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our long range interracial hybridization experiments between a pair of cross fertile races, Drosophila nasuta (2n = 8) and D.albomicans (2n = 6) have resulted in the evolution of two new karyotypic strains under laboratory conditions, which are named as Cytorace 1 and Cytorace 2. These Cytoraces harbor chromosomes from both parents. Here, we compare the body size of the parental races and newly evolved Cytoraces and the relationship between the body size and fitness. Analysis reveals that the parental races have reduced fertility and are larger in body size than newly evolved Cytoraces. Thus, the newly evolved Cytoraces show reduced body size and better fitness in the course of their evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashburner, M., 1989. Drosophila: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, J.J., 1987. Evolution of phenotypic variance. Evolution 41(2): 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capy, P., E. Pla & J.R. David, 1993. Phenotypic and genetic variability of morphometrical traits in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans I. Geographic variations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 25: 517–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakir, M., J.R. David, E. Pla & P. Capy, 1995. Genetic basis of some morphological differences between temperate and equatorial populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia 51: 744–748.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H., D. Wang & F.J. Ayala, 1989. On the origin of incipient reproductive isolation. The case of Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta. J. Mol. Evol. 28: 337–348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A., J. Rux & J.R. David, 1991. Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between D. sechellia and its relatives. Genet. Res. 57: 113–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R., 1979. Utilization of morphological traits for the analysis of Genetic variation in wild populations. Aquilo Ser. Zool. 20: 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R., B. Moreteau, J.P. Gauthier, G. Petavy, A. Stockel & A.G. Imasheva, 1994. Reaction norms of size characters in relation to growth temperature in Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale lines analysis. Genet. Sel. Evol. 26: 229–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagele, K. & H.A. Ranganath, 1982. The chromosomes of two Drosophila races: D. nasuta nasuta and D. n. albomicana. II. Differences in their microchromosomes. Chromosoma 85: 215–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hegde, S.N. & M.S. Krishna, 1997 Size-assortative mating in Drosophila malerkotliana. Anim. Behav. 54: 419–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, A.M., Santos & A. Fontdevila, 1995. Heritability and selection on body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics. 141: 181–189.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreteau, B., P. Capy, A. Alonso-Moraga, A. Munoz-Serrano, J. Stockel & J.R. David, 1995. Genetic characterization of geographic populations using morphometrical traits in Drosophila melanogaster: isogroups versus isofemale lines. Genetica. 96: 207–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, J.P., B. Moreteau, G. Petavy, A.G. Imasheva & J.R. David, 1996. Body size and developmental temperature in Drosophila simulans: Comparison of reaction norms with sympatric Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Sel. Evol. 28: 415–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nirmala, S.S., 1973. Cytogenetic studies on the Drosophilids of Mysore State. PhD Thesis, University of Mysore, Mysore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T., 1971. The relation between fitness components and population prediction in Drosophila. 1. The estimation of fitness components. Genetics 68: 127–149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, N.B., 1987. Contributions to population cytogenetics of Drosophila: Studies on interracial hybridization and B-chromosomes, PhD Thesis, University of Mysore, Mysore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, N.B. & H.A. Ranganath, 1986. The chromosomes of two Drosophila races: D. nasuta nasuta and D. nasuta albomicana IV. Hybridization and karyotype repatterning. Chromosoma 93: 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, N.B. & H.A. Ranganath, 1987. Mating preference between Drosophila nasuta nasuta and D. n. albomicana. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 25: 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, N.B. & H.A. Ranganath, 1994. Pattern of sexual isolation between parental races (Drosophila nasuta nasuta and D. n. albomicans) and the newly evolved races (Cytoraces I & II). Indian J. Exp. Biol. 32: 98–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, N.B. & H.A. Ranganath, 1995–96. Population differentiation: A study with two strains of Drosophila albomicans. J. Mysore University, sec. B 34: 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra. N.B. & H.A. Ranganath, 1996. Evolution of nasutaalbomicans complex of Drosophila. Curr. Sci. 71(7): 515–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranganath. H.A. 1975. Genetic integrity, population density and selection studies in a few members of the immigrans group of Drosophila, PhD thesis, University of Mysore, Mysore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranganath, H.A. & K. Hagele, 1981. Karyotypic orthoselection in Drosophila. Naturwissenchaften 68: 527–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganath, H.A. & K. Hagele, 1982. The chromosomes of two Drosophila races: D. nasuta nasuta and D. nasuta albomicana I. Distribution and differentiation of heterochromatin. Chromosoma 85: 83–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganath, H.A. & N.B. Ramachandra, 1987. Chromosomal basis of raciation in Drosophila: A study with Drosophila nasuta and D. albomicana. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci (Anim sci) 96: 451–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganath, H.A. & N.B. Ramachandra, 1994. Drosophila albomicans — A unique karyotype. The Nucleus 37(3): 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F.W., 1987. Variation of body size within and between wild populations of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetica 72: 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D.A., 1986. Predicting body size with life history models. Bioscience 36: 316–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, A.M., A. Santos, J.E. Barbadilla, E. Quezada-Diaz, Hassan & A. Fontdevila, 1991. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii XVIII. Genetic variation for body size in a natural population. Genetics 128: 739–750.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M., A. Ruiz, J.E. Quezada-Diaz, A. Barbadilla & A. Fontdevila, 1992. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii XX. Positive phenotypic covariance between field adult fitness components and body size. J. Evol. Biol. 5: 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.N. & S. Mathew, 1997. Greater fertility of Drosophila ananassae flies possessing high number of sternopleural bristles. Curr. Sci. 72: 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, A., 1966. Morphological variation in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila pseudobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 20: 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F.D., M.R. Wheeler, M. Harget & M. Kambysellis, 1969. Cytogenetic relations in the Drosophila nasuta subgroup of species. Univ. Texas Publ. 6918: 207–254.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harini, B., Ramachandra, N. Does evolution reduce the body size? A study of the four members of newly evolved nasuta‐albomicans complex of Drosophila. Genetica 105, 1–6 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003762826116

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003762826116

Navigation