Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Was Hayek a Panglossian Evolutionary Theorist? A Reply to Whitman

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By means of a consideration of Whitman (1998) the present paper considers the meanings of ‘Panglossianism’ and the relation between group and individual levels in evolution. It establishes the connection between the Panglossian policy prescription of laissez-faire and the mistaken evolutionary theory of group selection. Analysis of the passages in Hayek cited by Whitman shows that, once these passages are taken in context, and once the appropriate meaning of the term ‘Panglossian’ has been clarified, they fail to defend Hayek from this charge, but, on the contrary, confirm that Hayek was, indeed, ‘a Panglossian evolutionary theorist’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dawkins, R. (1989a) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1989b) The Extended Phenotype: the Long Reach of the Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1995) River out of Eden. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1995) Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. G. N. (1967) Evolutionary Ethics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. (1979) “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B205: 581–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1942) Scientism and the Study of Society Economica, vol. 91. pp. 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1967) Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1973) Law, Legislation and Liberty. A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Rules and Order, vol. 1. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1988) The Fatal Conceit: The errors of socialism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1993) Economics and Evolution. Bringing Life Back into Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, G. (1996) “The Significance of Myth and Misunderstanding in Social Science Narrative: Opening Access to Hayek's Copernican Revolution in Economics.” Paper presented at the 1996 annual meetings of the History of Economics Society and the Southern Economics Association; http://www.hayekcenter.org/hayekmyth.htm

  • Smith, J. M. (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, D. G. (1998) “Hayek contra Pangloss on Evolutionary Systems.” Constitutional Political Economy 9: 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, City University, London, UK

    Andy Denis

Authors
  1. Andy Denis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denis, A. Was Hayek a Panglossian Evolutionary Theorist? A Reply to Whitman. Constitutional Political Economy 13, 275–285 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016173117330

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016173117330

Keywords

Search

Navigation