Abstract
This contribution focuses on the application of bibliometric techniques to research activities in China, based on data extracted from the Science Citation Index (SCI) and related Citation Indexes, produced by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). The main conclusion is that bibliometric analyses based on the ISI databases in principle provide useful and valid indicators of the international position of Chinese research activities, provided that these analyses deal properly with the relatively large number of national Chinese journals covered by the ISI indexes. It is argued that it is important to distinguish between a national and an international point of view. In order to assess the Chinese research activities from a national perspective, it is appropriate to use the scientific literature databases with a good coverage of Chinese periodicals, such as the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), produced at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Assessment of the position of Chinese research from an international perspective should be based on the ISI databases, but it is suggested to exclude national Chinese journals from this analysis. In addition it is proposed to compute an indicator of international publication activity, defined as the percentage of articles in journals processed for the ISI indexes, with the national Chinese journals being removed, relative to the total number of articles published either in national Chinese or in other journals, regardless of whether these journals are processed for the ISI indexes or not. This indicator can only be calculated by properly combining CSCD and ISI indexes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ding, Y. (1996), Bibliometric Research on Chinese bibliometric Researches: 1973-1994 (in Chinese). Master Thesis, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Garfield, E. (1997), Citation Indexing — Its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology and Humanities. New York, USA: Wiley.
Jin B., W ANG B. (1999), Chinese Science Citation Database: Its construction and application, Scientometrics 45: 325-332.
Liang L., Wu Y., Li J. (2001), Selection of Databases, Indicators and Models for Evaluating Academic Performance of Chinese Universities, Research Evaluation, to be published.
Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., Van Leeuwen Th. N. (1995), New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics 33: 381-422.
Schubert, A., GlÄnzel, W. (1983), Statistical reliability of comparisons based on the citation impact of scientific publications, Scientometrics, 5: 59-74.
Van Leeuwen, Th. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., Van Raan, A. F. J. (2000), First evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems, Research Evaluation, 9: 155-156.
Van Leeuwen, Th. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., Van Raan, A. F. J. (2001), Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance, Scientometrics, 53: 249-266.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (1996), Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises, Scientometrics, 36: 396-420.
Zitt M, Perrot, F., Barre, R. (1998), The transition from “national” to “transnational” model and related measures of countries' performance, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49: 3-42.
Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E. (1998), Internationalization of scientific journals: A measurement based on publication and citation scope, Scientometrics, 41: 255-271.
Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E. (1999), Internationalization of communication. A view on the evolution of scientific journals, Scientometrics, 46: 669-685.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moed, H.F. Measuring China"s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 53, 281–296 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014812810602
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014812810602