Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling Organizational Systems: Banathy's Three Lenses Revisited

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inherent complexity of organizational systems defies full understanding by inquirers. This condition often causes organizational inquirers to become mired in convoluted deliberations, unable to attain the consensus among the inquiring community that is needed to advance the research forward to a meaningful conclusion. Consequently, many practitioners and researchers employ models of organizations to aid in simplifying the system's complexity and to reach shared agreement. Because no single model can fully capture the complexity of an organization, Dr. Bela H. Banathy therefore proposed using three types of interrelated models to give a multidimensional view of a human system under study. Since Banathy first introduced his three lenses approach, the concept has been employed in many educational and organizational settings. This article examines the author's experience using Banathy's three lenses and integrates their usage with some other popular modeling techniques, providing a comprehensive view of how Banathy's three lenses can be effectively employed in contemporary organizational settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allee, V. (2002). The Future of Knowledge: Increasing Prosperity Through Value Networks, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA.}

  • Banathy, B. H. (1973). Developing a Systems View of Education: The Systems-Model Approach, Lear Siegler/Fearon, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1992). Systems Design of Education: Concepts and Principles for Effective Practice, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1996a). Designing Social Systems in a Changing World, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1996b). Systems inquiry and its application in education. In Jonassen, D. H. (ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communication and Technology, MacMillan Library Reference, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (2000). Guided Evolution of Society: A Systems View, Kluwer/Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Social Systems, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.}

  • Miller, J. G. (1995). Living Systems, University of Colorado Press, Niwot, CO.}

  • Morecroft, J. D. W., and Sterman, J. D. (eds.) (1994). Modeling for Learning Organizations, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.}

  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saybrook Graduate School, San Francisco, California

    Douglas C. Walton

Authors
  1. Douglas C. Walton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walton, D.C. Modeling Organizational Systems: Banathy's Three Lenses Revisited. Systemic Practice and Action Research 17, 265–284 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAA.0000040647.65393.79

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAA.0000040647.65393.79

Search

Navigation