Abstract
The Ackoff–Gharajedaghi Model of System Types distinguishes 3 fundamental empirical systems: deterministic, animate, and social, with regard to their purpose. It has been formulated as a meta-model to support understanding, selection, and formulation of management models and theories. It is argued here that this model is also valuable for the interpretation and design of actual, empirical business systems. A study of a malfunctioning business is presented and interpreted with the Ackoff–Gharajedaghi Model, which supports this argument. Additionally, the study shows a pragmatic value of the proposed “Imperative of Goals Alignment” for the design of business systems, which is an operationalization of the Ackoff–Gharajedaghi Model. Furthermore, the investigation illustrates the importance of clear goals and incentives in business design; and it supports the thesis of the Ackoff–Gharajedaghi Model that management models and theories, founded upon empirical observations of deterministic and animate systems, impose limitations on the design of business systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff, R. L., and Gharajedaghi, J. (1996). Reflections on systems and their models. Syst. Res. 13(1), 13-23.
Eriksson, D. M. (1998). Managing Problems of Postmodernity: Some Heuristics for Evaluation of Systems Approaches, Interim report IR-98-060/August, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria.
Hax, A. C., and Wilde, D. L. II, (1999). The delta model. Sloan Manage. Rev. 40(2), 11-28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eriksson, D.M. On the Usefulness of the Ackoff–Gharajedaghi Model of System Types for the Design of Business Systems. Systemic Practice and Action Research 17, 75–81 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAA.0000018904.16500.6c
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAA.0000018904.16500.6c