Abstract
This paper takes a critical look at the Smart Growth movement and its reliance on traditional central planning to achieve its goals. Using statewide planning in Oregon, Florida, and Washington State as examples, the paper examines the planning focus of recent efforts to manage growth through land-use planning at the state level. It then applies the Austrian critique of economic planning to the contemporary Smart Growth movement in the United States as it is reflected in statewide planning laws. The calculation debate focused primarily on the technical question of whether bureaucratic planning could, in fact, achieve market outcomes. In the current debate over Smart Growth, planning combines political and bureaucratic decisionmaking. The political context in which planning decisions are made fundamentally alters the decision making process, shifting the emphasis to articulate knowledge as the foundation for policymaking. To be relevant in the current debate over planning, the calculation debate needs to be extended to include a political dimension to its critique of planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APA (2001a) “Growing SmartSM Statutory Planning Summary for the State of Florida” (May 1996 update), www.planning.org/plnginfo/growsmar/summary/fla.pdf, June 20.
American Planning Association (APA)(2001b) “Growing SmartSM Statutory Planning Summary for the State of Washington (May 1996b),” www/planning.org/plnginfo/growsmar/summry/washing.pdf. June 19.
Anthony, Jerry (2000) The Impacts of State Growth Management Regulations on Housing Prices and Housing Affordability in Florida. Tallahassee, Florida: Florida State University, College of Social Sciences, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Summer 2000.
Baxandall, Rosalyn and Ewen, Elizabeth (2000) Picture Windows: How the Suburbs Happened. New York: Basic Books.
Conder, Sony and Larson, Karen (1998) Residential Lot Values and the Capital-Land Substitution Parameter—Some Recent Results from the Portland Metro Area. Growth Management Services Division, Metro, unpublished paper, Portland, Oregon, May.
DeGrove, John M. and Metzger, Patricia M. (1993) “Growth Management and the Integrated Roles of State, Regional, and Local Government.” In: Stein, Jay M. (Ed.) Growth Management: The Planning Challenge of the 1990s, pp. 3-17. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
Downs, Anthony (2001) “What Does 'smart Growth- Really Mean?” Planning (April), http://www.planning.org/pubs/plng01/april012.htm.
Edgens, Jefferson G. (2001) “National Land-use Planning Through Environmental Policy.” In: Holcombe and Staley (Eds.) Smarter Growth, pp. 95-112.
English, Mary R., Peretz, Jean H., and Manderschied, Melissa (1999) Smart Growth for Tennessee Towns and Counties: A Process Guide. Knoxville, Tennessee: Energy, Environment and Resources Center, University of Tennessee, February 1999, http://eerc.ra.utk.edu/smart/title.htm.
Eugene, City of (2000) Growth Management Implementation Projects. Status Report for 2000, Eugene, Oregon.
Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 9J-5k. “Housing Element.”
Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) (1999) Affordable Housing Study Commission Final Report 1999. Tallahassee, Florida.
Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) (2000) Growth Management Program—A Comparison of Selected States, www.floridagrowth.org/pdf/states.pdf, July 31.
Hayek, F. A. (1978) “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” In: New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holcombe, Randall G. (1990) “Distributional Aspects of Florida's Concurrency Requirement.” Florida Policy Review, 5(Winter): 8-14.
Holcombe, Randall G. (2001) “Growth Management in Action: The Case of Florida.” In: Holcombe and Staley (Eds.) Smarter Growth, pp. 131-154.
Holcombe, Randall G. and Staley, Samuel R. (Eds.) (2001) Smarter Growth: Market-Based Strategies for Land-use Planning in the 21st Century. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Horwitz, Steven (1996) “Money, Money Prices, and the Socialist Calculation Debate.” Advances in Austrian Economics, 3: 59-77.
Horwitz, Steven (1998) “Monetary Calculation and Mises's Critique of Planning.” History of Political Economy, 30(3): 427-450.
Howe, Deborah (1993) “Growth Management in Oregon.” In: Stein, Jay M. (Ed.) Growth Management: The Planning Challenge of the 1990s, pp. 61-75. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
Kirzner, Israel (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Knapp, Gerrit (1987) “The Price Effects of Urban-Growth Boundaries in Metropolitan Portland, Oregon.” Land Economics, 61: 92-97.
Knaap, Gerrit J. and Hopkins, Lewis D. (2001) “The Inventory Approach to Urban Growth Boundaries.” Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(3): 314-326.
Knaap, Gerrit and Nelson, Arthur C. (1992) The Regulated Landscape: Lessons on State Land Use Planning from Oregon. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
Lachmann, Ludwig M. (1986) The Market as an Economic Process. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Lavoie, Don (1985) National Economic Planning: What is Left? Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Mildner, Gerard C. S. (2001) “Regionalism and the Growth Management Movement.” In: Holcombe and Staley (Eds.) Smarter Growth, pp. 113-130.
Myers, Phyllis (1999) “Livability at the Ballot Box: State and Local Referenda on Parks, Conservation, and Smarter Growth, Election Day 1998.” Discussion Paper prepared for The Brookings Institution, Center for Urban and Metropolitan Policy, January 1999.
Perkins Coie, The Washington Growth Management Act After Ten Years.
Phillips, Justin and Goodstein, Eban (2000) “Growth Management and Housing Prices: The Case of Portland, Oregon.” Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(3): 334-344.
Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) (1998) The Washington State Growth Management Act with Applications for the Central Puget Sound Region. Forecasting and Growth Strategy Department.
Staley, Samuel R. (1994) Planning Rules and Urban Economic Performance: The Case of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press/Hong Kong Centre for Economic Research.
Staley, Samuel R. (2001) “Ballot-box Zoning, Transaction Costs, and Urban Growth.” Journal of the American Planning Association, 1: 25-37.
Staley, Samuel R. (2001) “Markets, Smart Growth, and the Limits of Policy.” In: Holcombe and Staley (Eds.) Smarter Growth, pp. 201-218.
Staley, Samuel R. (2002) “Zoning, Smart Growth, and Regulatory Taxation.” In: Donald P. Racheter and Richard E. Wagner (Eds.) Politics, Taxation, and the Rule of Law. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Staley, Samuel R. and Gilroy, Leonard C. (2001) Smart Growth and Housing Affordability: Lessons from Statewide Planning Laws. Policy Study No. 287. Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
Staley, Samuel R. and Mildner, Gerard C. S. (2000) “The Price of Managing Growth.” Urban Land, 59(2): 20.
Salkin, Patricia E. (2000) “Smart Growth: The State of the States.” Presentation to the Northeast State Planning Directors Meeting.
Salkin, Patricia E. (1999) “Smart Growth at Century's End: The State of the States.” Urban Lawyer, 31(3): 601-648.
Lai, Lawrence W. (1997) “Property Rights Justifications for Planning and a Theory of Zoning.” In: Diamond, D. and Massam, B. H. (Eds.) Progress in Planning: Recent Research on Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 161-246. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Staley, S.R. Urban Planning, Smart Growth, and Economic Calculation: An Austrian Critique and Extension. The Review of Austrian Economics 17, 265–283 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RAEC.0000026835.56440.92
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RAEC.0000026835.56440.92