Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological features of interfacial intermetallics and interfacial reaction rate in Al-11Si-2.5Cu-(0.15/0.60)Fe cast alloy/die steel couples

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soldering reactions are commonly observed during high pressure die casting of aluminium alloys, and involve the formation and growth of interfacial intermetallics between the die and the cast alloy. It is generally believed that close to 1% Fe is necessary in the aluminium alloy to reduce soldering. However, the role of iron in the interfacial reaction has not been studied in detail. In this investigation, reaction couples were formed between H13 tool steel substrates and an Al-11Si-2.5Cu melt containing either 0.15 or 0.60% Fe. Examination revealed distinctly different intermetallic layer morphology. The overall growth and chemistry of the reaction layer and the reaction rate measured by the consumption of the substrate were compared for the two alloy melts. It was demonstrated that a higher iron content reduces the rate of interfacial reaction, consistent with an observed thicker compact (solid) intermetallic layer. Hence, the difference in reaction rate can be explained by a significant reduction in the diffusion flux due to a thicker compact layer. Finally, the mechanism of the growth of a thicker compact layer in the higher iron melt is proposed, based on the phase relations and diffusion both within and near the interfacial reaction zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Venkatesan and R. Shivpuri, in Transactions of the 18th International Casting Congress and Exposition, Indianapolis, 1995 (NADCA, Rosemont, 1995) Paper 106.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. Taylor, D. H. StJohn, J. Barresi and M. J. Couper, Intern. J. Cast Met. Res. 12 (2000) 409.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z. W. Chen, D. T. Fraser and M. Z. Jahedi, Mater. Sci. Engin. A 260 (1999) 188.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Chu, P. S. Cheng and R. Shivpuri, in Transactions of the 17th International Casting Congress and Exposition, Cleveland, 1993 (NADCA, Rosemont, 1993) Paper 124.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Norstrom, B. Klarenfjord and M. Svensson, in Transactions of the 17th International Casting Congress and Exposition, Cleveland, 1993 (NADCA, Rosemont, 1993) Paper 75.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Shankar and D. Apelian, in Transactions of the 17th International Casting Congress and Exposition, Cleveland, 1993 (NADCA, Rosemont, 1993) Paper 85.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Idem., in Proceedings of the 5th International Molten Metal Conference, Orlando, 1998 (AFS 1998) p. 281

  8. Idem., in Transactions of the 20th International Casting Congress and Exposition, Cleveland, 1999 (NADCA, Rosemont, 1999) paper 83.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Sundqvist, J. Bergstrom, T. Bjork and R. Westergard, in Transactions of the 19th International Casting Congress and Exposition, Minneapolis, 1997 (NADCA, Rosemont, 1997) Paper 104.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Sundqvist and S. Hogmark, Trib. Intern. 26 (1993) 129.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Yu, Y. Chu and R. Shivpuri, in Transactions of the 17th International Casting Congress and Exposition, Cleveland, 1993 (NADCA, Rosemont, 1993) Paper 72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Yan and Z. Fan, J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 1661.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Idem., ibid. 36 (2001) 285.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Z. W. Chen and M. Z. Jahedi, Intern. J. Cast Met. Res. 11 (1998) 129.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. A. Taylor, G. B. Schaffer and D. H. StJohn, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30A (1998) 1651.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. A. Granger, in Transactions of the 95th American Foundry Society Casting Congress, Birminghan, 1991 (AFS, Des Plaines, 1991) p. 379.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. G. Denner and R. D. Jones, Met. Techn. 4 (1977) 167.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Eggeler, W. Auer and H. Kaesche, J. Mater. Sci. 21 (1986) 3348.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Idem., Z. Metallkde 77 (1986) 239.

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. A. El-mahallaway, M. A. Taha, M. A. Shady, A. R. El-sissi, A. N. Attia and W. Reif, Mater. Sci. Techn. 13 (1997) 832.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. B. Winkelman, Z. W. Chen, D. H. StJohn and M. Z. Jahedi, to be submitted to J. Mater. Sci. Lett.

  22. R. W. Richards, R. D. Jones, P. D. Clements and H. Clarke, Intern. Mater. Rev. 39 (1994) 191.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. N. Lamkov, Avtom. Svarka 24 (1971) 64.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. N. Lamkov, V. M. Falchenko, D. F. Polishchuk, V. R. Ryabov and A. V. Lozovskya, ibid. 3 (1970) 66.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. F. Mondolfo, “Aluminium Alloys: Structure and Properties” (Butterworths, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. G. Rivlin and G. V. Raynor, Intern. Met. Rev. 3 (1981) 133.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. G. Shabestari and J. E. Gruzleski, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Light Alloy Metals: Processing and Applications, Quebec, 1993 (CIM, Quebec, 1993) p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winkelman, G.B., Chen, Z.W., John, D.H.S. et al. Morphological features of interfacial intermetallics and interfacial reaction rate in Al-11Si-2.5Cu-(0.15/0.60)Fe cast alloy/die steel couples. Journal of Materials Science 39, 519–528 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000011507.38552.19

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000011507.38552.19

Keywords

Navigation