Skip to main content
Log in

The Grammaticalization of the Infinitival Preposition – Toward a Theory of ‘Grammaticalizing Reanalysis’

  • Published:
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The observational point of departure in this paper is that infinitivals (in Dutch and German) have no tense. Apparent counterexamples to this claim can be shown to involve aspect/Aktionsarten rather than tense. There is consequently no reason to posit any of the functional shell structure associated with tense. Hence, the infinitival markers (zu, te) may be assumed to be in (or close to) the VP. This is in accordance with the observation that these infinitival markers are always directly adjacent to the verb, which makes them similar to the verbal participial prefix ge-. A Minimalist account of zu/te, which is similar but not identical to ge-, is proposed. The question is then raised how zu (originally a true local-allative preposition) could have become a verbal prefix, and relevant diachronic data are adduced. Finally it is shown that a functionalist, or ‘cognitivist’, theory of grammaticalization like Haspelmath’s misses the point in a number of ways. A more formalist theory of ‘grammaticalizing reanalysis’ is proposed as a better alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, Werner: 1983, 'The Control Relation in German', in W. Abraham (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the West Germania, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 217-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, Werner: 1984, 'Verbal Substantives in German', in Chr. Bhatt, E. Löbel, and Cl. Schmidt (eds.), Syntactic Phrase Structure Phenomena, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 79-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, Werner: 1990, 'A Note on the Aspect-Syntax Interface', in J. Mascaró and M. Nespor (eds.), Grammar in Progress. GLOW Essays for Henk van Riemsdijk, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, Werner: 1993, 'Ergativa sind Terminativa', Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 12(2), 157-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, Werner: 1995, Syntax des Deutschen im Sprachenvergleich, Gunther Narr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, Werner: 1997, 'The Interdependence of Case, Aspect and Referentiality in the History of German: The Case of the Genitive', in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 29-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, Werner: 1999, 'Ñber allgemeine Zusammenhänge zwischen Präpositionsinfinitiv, Futur, deontischer Modalität und Perfektivität: lokalistische Allativität', Sprachwissenschaft 24, 361-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, Werner: 2001, 'How Far Does Semantic Bleaching Go? About Grammaticalization that Does Not Terminate in Functional Categories', in J. T. Faarlund (ed.), Grammatical Relations in Change, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 15-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, Werner and C. Jac Conradie: 2001, Präteritumschwund und Diskursgrammatik. Präteritumschwund in gesamteuropäischen Bezügen: areale Ausbreitung, heterogene Entstehung, Parsing sowie diskursgrammatische Grundlagen und Zusammenhänge, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akmajian, Adrian, Susan Steele, and Timothy Wasow: 1979, 'The Category of AUX in Universal Grammar', Linguistic Inquiry 10(1), 1-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiadou, Artemis: 2001, Functional Structure in Nominals. Nominalization and Ergativity, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark: 1992, Morphology by Itself, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1988, Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson, and Ian Roberts: 1985, 'Passive Arguments Raised', Linguistic Inquiry 20(2), 219-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battye, Adrian and Roberts, Ian (eds.): 1995, Clause Structure and Language Change, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, Josef: 1993, 'zum in Bavarian and Scrambling', in W. Abraham and J. Bayer (eds.), Dialektsyntax, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp. 50-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beedham, Christopher: 1981, 'The Passive in English, German, and Russian', Journal of Linguistics 17, 319-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, Émile: 1975, Problémes linguistique général II, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besten, Hans den: 1989, Studies in West Germanic Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tilburg.

  • Bhatt, Christa: 1989, 'Parallels in the Syntactic Realisation of the Arguments of Verbs and their Nominalizations', in Chr. Bhatt, E. Löbel, and Cl. Schmidt (eds.), Syntactic Phrase Structure Phenomena in Noun Phrases and Sentences, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 17-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan: 1972, 'The Passive in Lexical Theory', in J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Joan and William Pagliuca: 1987, 'The Evolution of Future Meaning', in Anna G. Ramat, O. Carruba, and G. Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 109-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Joan, R. Perkins, and W. Pagliuca: 1994, The Evolution of Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1992, 'A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory', M.I.T. Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. Chomsky, Noam: 1995,The Minimalist Program, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Robin and Ian Roberts: 1993, 'A Computational Model of Language Learnability and Language Change', Linguistic Inquiry 24, 299-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal, Ingerid: 1966, Historische Syntax des Deutschen, M. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deemter, Kees van and Stanley Peters (eds.): 1996, Semantic Ambiguity and Underspecification, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demske-Neumann, Ulrike: 1994, Modales Passiv und Tough Movement. Zur strukturellen Kausalität eines syntaktischen Wandels im Deutschen und Englischen, M. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demske, Ulrike: 2001, 'Zur Distribution von Infinitivkomplementen im Althochdeutschen', in R. Müller and M. Reis (eds.), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, Buske, Hamburg, pp. 61-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewald, Gabriele: 1997, Grammatikalisierung. Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen, M. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, Robert P.: 1976, Infinitival Complement Constructions in Early New High German, M. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David: 2000, 'Features, Syntax and Categories in the Latin Perfect', Linguistic Inquiry 31, 185-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph: 1985, A Unified Analysis of Syntactic Categories, Foris Publications, Dordrecht-Cinnaminson, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endresen, Rolf Theil: 1992, 'og og å -homonymi eller polysemi?' ms., University of Oslo.

  • Faarlund, Jan Terje: 1995, 'The Changing Structure of Infinitival Clauses in Nordic', paper read at the International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995.

  • Fischer, Olga, Anette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein (eds.): 2001, Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaeta, Livio: 1997, The Inflection vs. Derivation Dichotomy: The Case of German Infinitives. Paper presented at the XVI International Congress of Linguists, Paris, July, 1997.

  • Gelderen, Elly van: 1993, The Rise of Functional Categories, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelderen, Elly van: 1996, 'The Reanalysis of Grammaticalized Prepositions in Middle English', Studia Linguistic 50(2), 106-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelderen, Elly van: 1997, Verbal Agreement and the Grammar behind its Breakdown, M. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelderen, Elly van: 1998, 'The Future of for to', American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 10(1), 45-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelderen, Elly van: 2001, 'Phrases, Heads, Grammaticalization, and Economy', paper read at ICHL 16, Summer 2001 at Melbourne, Paper Arizona State University at Tempe.

  • Gelderen, Elly van: 2002, 'To not or Not to: Optionality in Syntax?', ms., Arizona State University at Tempe.

  • Giusti, Gugliana: 1991, 'zu-Infinitivals and the Structure of IP in German', ms., University of Venice.

  • Haider, Hubert: 1986, 'Nicht-sententiale Infinitive', Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL) 28, 73-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, Heidi: 1995, Subjects, Events, and Licensing, Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.

  • Haspelmath, Martin: 1989, 'From Purposive to Infinitive-A Universal Path of Grammaticization', Folia Linguistica Historica X (1-2), 287-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin: 1996, 'Word Class Changing Inflection and Morphological Theory', in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 43-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin: 1997, 'Why Is Grammaticalization Irreversible?', paper read at the ICHL Düsseldorf 1997, published in Linguistics 37(6),1043-1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin: 1998, 'Does Grammaticalization Need Reanalysis?', Studies in Language 22(2), 315-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin: 1999a, 'Are there Principles of Grammatical Change?', Journal of Linguistics 35, 579-595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin: 1999b, 'Optimality and Diachronic Adaptation', Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2), 180-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin: 2002, 'On Directionality in Language Change, with Particular Reference to Unidirectionality in Grammaticalization', paper (handout) given at the Conference New Reflections on Grammaticalization 2, University of Amsterdam, April 2002.

  • Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer: 1991, Grammaticalization, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, Bernd and Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.): 1994, Grammaticalization, 2 vols. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Jarich: 1997, The Syntax of Infinitives in Frisian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.

  • Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott: 1993, Grammaticalization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra Thompson: 1996, 'Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse', Language 56(2), 251-299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IJbema, Aniek: 1997, 'Der zu-Infinitiv', ms., University of Groningen.

  • Kayne, Richard S.: 1981, 'On Certain Differences between French and English', Linguistic Inquiry 12(3), 349-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Christian: 1985, 'Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change', Lingua e stile 20(3), 303-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, David: 1999, The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeling, Anke: 2001, On Particle Verbs and Similar Constructions in German, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, Maria-Rita and Anna Roussou: 1997, 'Interpretation as Feature Calculus: F-Movement and F-Control', GLOW Newsletter 38, 42-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massam, D.: 1985, Case Theory and the Projection Principle, Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke: 1984, 'Control and the Thematic Domain', Language 60(2), 215-250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1989, 'Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP', Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poupynin, Youri A.: 1980, Funktsionirovanie vidov russkogo glagola v passivnix konstruktsiyax, Ph.D. dissertation, University St. Petersburg.

  • Poupynin, Youri A. 1996, 'Central and Peripheral Connections between Aspect and Voice in Russian', Folia Linguistica 30, 129-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramat, Paolo: 1992, 'Thoughts on Degrammaticalization', Linguistics 30, 549-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, Tanja and Eric J. Reuland: 1993, 'Reflexivity', Linguistic Inquiry 24(4), 657-720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, Marga: 1979, 'Ansätze zu einer realistischen Grammatik', in K. Grubmueller et al. (eds.), Befund und Deutung. Zum Verhältnis von Empirie und Interpretation in Sprach-und Literaturwissenschaft, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 1-21.

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1982, Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian: 1993, 'A Formal Account of Grammaticalization in the History of Romance Futures', Folia Linguistica Historica 13(1), 259-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian: 1997, 'Grammaticalization and Reanalysis', paper read at the ICHL 1997, Reanalysis Workshop, September 1997, Düsseldorf.

  • Schoorlemmer, Maaike: 1995, Participial Passive and Aspect in Russian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.

  • Stowell, Timothy: 1982, 'The Tense of Infinitives', Linguistic Inquiry 13(3), 561-570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Timothy: 1993, 'syntax of Tense', ms., UCLA.

  • Thieroff, Rolf: 1997, 'Synthetische und analytische Verbformen im Sprachvergleich', paper read at the 4th Potsdam Colloquium on German Grammar, November 1997. Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Bernd Heine (eds.): 1991, Approaches to Grammaticalization (2 vols.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Auwera, Johan: 2002, 'More Thoughts on Degrammaticalization', in I. Wischer and G. Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, John Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 19-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, C.J.-W.: 1993, Dutch Syntax. A Minimalist Approach, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen, Revised book edition: 1997, Morphosyntax of Verb Movement: A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abraham, W. The Grammaticalization of the Infinitival Preposition – Toward a Theory of ‘Grammaticalizing Reanalysis’. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7, 111–170 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCOM.0000007343.96479.7f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCOM.0000007343.96479.7f

Navigation