Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-Cultural Approaches in Archaeology: Comparative Ethnology, Comparative Archaeology, and Archaeoethnology

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Research Aims and scope

Abstract

Cross-cultural approaches have been used widely in archaeological research. Comparative ethnology has provided a number of archaeological indicators of behavior, but large segments of the archaeological record have not yet been subjected to extensive comparative analysis. Comparative archaeology has aided in exploring variation among societal types (such as chiefdoms) and categories within the archaeological record (such as settlements). Diachronic comparisons have been used frequently by archaeologists, but these have often been based on unique samples and only rarely have employed statistics to aid in the discovery or testing of hypotheses. Archaeoethnology, comparative analyses of archaeological cases employing valid samples and statistical evaluation of theories and hypotheses, is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES CITED

  • Adams, R. M. (1966). The Evolution of Urban Society, Aldine, Chicago.

  • Allison, P. M. (ed.) (1999). The Archaeology of Household Activities, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammerman, A. J., and Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1984). Neolithic Transition and the Genetics of Populations in Europe, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, R. (1961). Analogy in archaeological interpretation. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17: 317–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, H. (1983). Causal Modeling, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

  • Binford, L. R. (1990). Mobility, housing, and environment: A comparative study. Journal of Anthropological Research 46: 119–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, I. (1981). Introduction to Causal Analysis in Sociology, MacMillian, London.

  • Blanton, R. E. (1993). Houses and Households: A Comparative Study, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, R. E., Kowalewski, S. A., Feinman, G. M., and Finsten, L. (1993). Ancient Mesoamerica: A Comparison of Change in Three Regions, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, R. E, and Taylor, J. (1995). Patterns of exchange and the social production of pigs in highland New Guinea: Their relevance to questions about the origins and evolution of agriculture. Journal of Archaeological Research 3: 113–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. M. (1987). Population estimation from floor area: A restudy of "Naroll's constant. BehaviorScience Research 21: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, R. L. (1962). Scale analysis as an instrument for the study of cultural evolution. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 18: 149–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, R. L. (1970). Scale analysis, evolutionary sequences, and the rating of cultures. In Naroll, R., and Cohen, R. (eds.), Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology, Natural History Press, Garden City, NY, pp. 834–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. (2003). The application of molecular genetic approaches to the study of human evolution. Nature Genetics Supplement 33: 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Menozzi, P., and Piazza, A. (1994). The History and Geography of Human Genes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1951). Social Evolution, Watts, London.

  • Claessen, H. J. M., and Skalník, P. (1978). The Early State, Mouton, The Hague.

  • Clark, J. G. D. (1951). Folk-culture and the study of European prehistory. In Grimes, W. F. (ed.), Aspects of Archaeology in Great Britain and Beyond, Edwards, London, pp. 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. G. D. (1953). Archaeological theories and interpretations: Old World. In Kroeber, A. L. (ed.), Anthropology Today, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. N. (1977). The Food Crisis in Prehistory: Overpopulation and the Origins of Agriculture, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. (1985). The Logic of Causal Order, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

  • Diamond, J. (1999). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divale, W. T. (1974). Migration, external warfare, and matrilocal residence. Behavior Science Research 9: 75–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divale, W. T. (1977). Living floors and marital residence: A replication. Behavior Science Research 12: 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. K. (1997). How Chiefs Come to Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R. (1974). An evaluation of alternative theories of matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. Behavior Science Research 9: 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R. (1975). Residential variation among hunter-gatherers. Behavior Science Research 10: 199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R. (2003) Cross-cultural research and its relevance for archaeological inference. Paper presented to the Working Group on Language and Prehistory, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM.

  • Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (1972). Conditions favoring multilocal residence. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 28: 382–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (1992a). Resource unpredictability, mistrust, and war: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 242–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (1992b). Warfare, aggression, and resource problems: Cross-cultural codes. Behavior Science Research 26: 169–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (2001). Cross-Cultural Research Methods, AltaMira, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R., Ember, M., and Pasternak, B. (1974). On the development of unilineal descent. Journal of Anthropological Research 30: 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, M. (1967). The emergence of neolocal residence. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences 30: 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, M. (1970). Taxonomy in comparative studies. In Naroll, R., and Cohen, R. (eds.), Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology, Natural History Press, Garden City, NY, pp. 697–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, M. (1973). An archaeological indicator of matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. American Antiquity 38: 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, M. (1974). The conditions that may favor avunculocal residence. Behavior Science Research 8: 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, M., and Ember, C. R. (1971). The conditions favoring matrilocal residence versus patrilocal residence. American Anthropologist 73: 571–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, M., and Ember, C. R. (1995). Worldwide cross-cultural studies and their relevance for archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 3: 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, G. M., and Neitzel, J. (1984). Too many types: An overview of sedentary prestate societies in the Americas. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 39–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. (1961). Art styles as cultural cognitive maps. American Anthropologist 63: 80–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (1967). The Evolution of Political Society: An Essay in Political Anthropology, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. A. (1980). Living Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. A., and Watson, P. J. (1982). A dialogue on the meaning and use of analogy in ethnoarchaeological reasoning. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 355–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallpike, C. R. (1986). The Principles of Social Evolution, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. F., and Zegura, S. L. (2002). The human Y chromosome haplogroup tree: Nomenclature and phylogeography of its major divisions. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1968). The Rise of Anthropological Theory, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1977). Cannibals and Kings: The Origins of Culture, Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1979). Cultural Materialism, Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1986). Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, K. A. (1998). Social hierarchy and burial treatments: A comparative assessment. Cross-Cultural Research 32: 79–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, S. (1990). A cross-cultural study of segmentation, architecture, and the use of space. In Kent, S. (ed.), Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, A.V., and Guernsey, S. J. (1919). Archaeological Explorations in Northeastern Arizona, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 65, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

  • Knoke, D., and Burke, P. (1980). Log-Linear Models, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

  • Kuper, A. (1988). The Invention of Primitive Society, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcnett, C. W. (1967). The Inference of Socio-Cultural Traits in Archaeology: A Statistical Approach,PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Tulane University, New York.

  • Mcnett, C. W. (1970). A settlement pattern scale of cultural complexity. In Naroll, R., and Cohen, R. (eds.), Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology, Natural History Press, Garden City, NY, pp. 872–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcnett, C. W. (1979). The cross-cultural method in archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 39–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcneill, J. R., and Mcneill, W. H. (2003). The Human Web: A Bird's-Eye View of World History, W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montelius, O. (1888). The Civilisation of Sweden in Heathen Times, Macmillan, New York.

  • Moore, C. B. (1916). Some aboriginal Sites of Green River, Kentucky. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 16(3): 430–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient Society, H. Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. (1957). Anthropology as a comparative science. Behavior Science 2: 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P., and Provost, C. (1973). Measurement of cultural complexity. Ethnology 12: 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naroll, R. (1962). Floor area and settlement population. American Antiquity 27: 587–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. A., and Rosen-Ayalon, M. (2002). In Pursuit of Gender: Worldwide Archaeological Approaches, AltaMira, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. A. (1969). Social Change and History, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L. (2002). Seriation, Stratigraphy, and Index Fossils: The Backbone of Archaeological Dating, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. H. (1988). Addressing prehistoric hunting practices through stone tool analysis. American Anthropologist 90: 335–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. H. (1998). Investigating correlates of sedentism and domestication in prehistoric North America. American Antiquity 63: 553–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1966). Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives, Prentice-Hall, Engelwood-Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. (2001). Practice and history in archaeology. Anthropological Theory 1: 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N. (1993). An archaeological correlate of war. North American Archaeologist 14: 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N. (1996a). Ethnology versus ethnographic analogy: A common confusion in archaeological interpretation. Cross-Cultural Research 30: 316–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N. (1996b). The birth of the gods revisited: A partial replication of Guy Swanson's 1960 cross-cultural study of religion. Cross-Cultural Research 30: 84–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N. (2001a). Outline of Archaeological Traditions, Human Relations Area Files, New Haven, CT.

  • Peregrine, P. N. (2001b). Cross-Cultural Comparative Approaches in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N. (2002). World Prehistory: Two Million Years of Human Life, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N. (2003). Atlas of cultural evolution. World Cultures 14(1): 2–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N., Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (2003). Universal patterns in cultural evolution: An empirical analysis using Guttman scaling. American Anthropologist 106(1): 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. N, and Ember, M, (eds). (2001-2002). Encyclopedia of Prehistory, 9 vol., Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M. C. (1966). House types and settlement patterns. Minnesota Archaeologist 28: 2–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, S. (1990). Social Evolutionism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (1965). Primitive Social Organization, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (1975). Origins of the State and Civilization: The Process of Cultural Evolution, W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1992). Re-Constructing Archaeology, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1898-1899). Principles of Sociology, 3 vol., D. Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. H. (1942). The direct historic approach to archaeology. American Antiquity 7: 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. H. (1949). Culture causality and law: A trial formulation of early civilizations. American Anthropologist 51: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. H. (1955). Irrigation Civilizations: A Comparative Study, Pan American Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. H. (1977). Wittfogel's irrigation hypothesis. In Steward, J. C., and Murphy, R. F. (eds.), Evolution and Ecology, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, G. (2001). The fates of human societies: A review of recent macrohistories. American Historical Review 106: 508–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. (1960). The Birth of the Gods, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (1898). Report on mound explorations of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology 12: 3–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (1989). A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (1998). Sociocultural Evolution, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (2003). Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive Culture, 2 vols., J. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. K. (1994). The Archaeology of Rank, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, W. S., and Dejarnette, D. L. (1942). An Archaeological Survey of the Pickwick Basin in the Adjacent Portions of the States of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 129, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

  • Webb, W. S., and Haag, W. G. (1939). The Chiggerville Site. Site1, Ohio County, Kentucky, Report in Anthropology and Archaeology 4(1), University of Kentucky, Lexington.

  • White, L. A. (1959). The Evolution of Culture, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, J. W. M., and Ayres, B. (1968). Inferences from the shape of dwellings. In Chang, K. C. (ed.), Settlement Archaeology, National Press Books, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittfogel, K. (1957). Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power,Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, H. T., and Johnson, G. A. (1975). Population, exchange, and early state formation in southwestern Iran. American Anthropologist 77: 267–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1982). An analogy by any other name is just as analogical: A commentary on the Gould-Watson dialogue. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1:382–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1985). The reaction against analogy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8: 63–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffee, N. (1993). Too many chiefs? (or, Safe texts for the '90s). In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.), Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 60–78.

    Google Scholar 

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF RECENT LITERATURE

  • Adler, M. A., and Wilshusen, R. H. (1990). Large-scale integrative facilities in tribal societies: Cross-cultural and southwestern US examples. World Archaeology 22: 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algaze, G. (1993). Expansionary dynamics of some early pristine states. American Anthropologist 95: 304–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (2001). Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Hunter-Gatherer and Environmental Data Sets, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, R. A., and Maschner, H. D. G. (2003). Complex Systems and Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyries, S., and Pétrequin, P. (eds.) (2001). Ethno-archaeology and Its Transfers, Archaeopress, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, C., Moore, C. C., Burton, M. L., and White, D. R. (1990). A cross-cultural historical analysis of subsistence change. American Anthropologist 92: 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchli,V., Lucas, G., and Cox, M. (2001). Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M. L., Moore, C. C., Whiting, J. W. M., and Romney, A. K. (1996). Regions based on social structure. Current Anthropology 37: 87–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyaya, U. C. (1996). Settlement pattern and the spatial organization of subsistence and mortuary practices in the Mesolithic Ganges Valley, north-central India. World Archaeology 27: 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chick, G. (1997). Cultural complexity: The concept and its measurement. Cross-Cultural Research 31: 275–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connah, G. (2001). African Civilizations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney-Rivera, C. M. (2000). Mississippian and Late Woodland Cultural Interaction and Regional Dynamics: A View from the Lower Illinois River Valley, PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Drooker, P. B. (ed.) (2001). Fleeting Identities: Perishable Material Culture in Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper No. 28, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drooker, P. B., and Webster, L. D. (eds.) (2000). Beyond Cloth and Cordage: Archaeological Textile Research in the Americas, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. (2001). Archaeology, property, and prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (1998). Cross-cultural research. In Bernard, H. R. (ed.), Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, Alta Mira, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 647–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R., Ember, M., and Russett, B. (1992). Peace between participatory polities: A cross-cultural test of the "democracies rarely fight each other" hypothesis. World Politics 44: 573–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R., and Levinson, D. (1991). The substantive contributions of worldwide cross-cultural studies using secondary data. Behavior Science Research 25: 79–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, G. M., Lightfoot, K. G., and Upham, S. (2000). Political hierarchy and organizational strategies in the Puebloan Southwest. American Antiquity 65: 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, G. M., and Manzanilla, L. (eds.) (2000). Cultural Evolution: Contemporary Viewpoints, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. E., and Granjean, B. D. (2001). Economy and religion in Neolithic revolution: Material surplus and the proto-religious ethic. Cross-Cultural Research 35: 370–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillings, M., Mattingly, D. J., and van Dalen, J. (eds.) (2000). Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology, Oxbow, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, R. B. (1995). A Scientific Model of Social and Cultural Evolution, Thomas Jefferson University Press, Kirksville, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. P. (1990). Modeling Oneota agricultural production: A cross-cultural evaluation. Current Anthropology 31: 569–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, T. L., Lipo, C. P., and Sterling, S. L. (eds.) (2001). Posing Questions for a Scientific Archaeology, Bergin and Garvey, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S. R. (1994). Regional Variation in Prehistoric Pueblo Households and Social Organization: A Quantitative Approach, PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe.

  • Johnson, A. L. (2002). Cross-cultural analysis of pastoral adaptations and organizational states: A preliminary study. Cross-Cultural Research 36: 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A., and Earle, T. (1987). The Evolution of Human Societies, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2002). Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., and MacGregor, G. (eds.) (2002). Colouring the Past: The Significance of Colour in Archaeological Research,Berg, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, P., and Shennan, S. (2003). Cultural transmission, language, and basketry traditions amongst the California Indians. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 22: 42–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, S. (1999). The archaeological visibility of storage: Delineating storage from trash areas. American Antiquity 64: 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, P. V. (1984). The Evolution of Polynesian Chiefdoms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, M. J., and Snead, J. E. (1997). It's a small world after all: Comparative analyses of community organization in archaeology. American Antiquity 62: 609–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooyman, B. P. (2000). Understanding Stone Tools and Archaeological Sites, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekson, S. H. (2002). War in the Southwest, war in the world. American Antiquity 67: 607–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D., and Malone, M. J. (1980). Toward Explaining Human Culture: A Critical Review of the Findings of Worldwide Cross-Cultural Research, Human Relations Area Files, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R., and Pagel, M. (1994). The comparative method in anthropology. Current Anthropology 35: 549–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, R. K. (2001). Crafting K'awil: A Comparative Analysis of Maya Symbolic Flaked Stone Assemblages from Three Sites in Northern Belize, PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin.

  • Moore, C. C., and Romney, A. K. (1994). Material culture, geographic propinquity, and linguist affiliation on the north coast of New Guinea: A reanalysis. American Anthropologist 96: 370–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, M. B. (2001). Using phylogenetically based comparative methods in anthropology: More questions than answers. Evolutionary Anthropology 10: 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P., Ford, C. S., Hudson, A. E., Kennedu, R., Simmons, L. W., and Whiting, J. W. M. (2000). Outline of Cultural Materials, 5th edn. with modifications, Human Relations Area Files, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Rourke, L. C. (2002). Las Galeras and San Lorenzo: A Comparative Study of Two Early Formative Communities in Southern Veracruz, Mexico, PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge.

  • Pearson, J. L. (2001). Shamanism and the Ancient Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Archaeology,AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P. C., and Paterson, A. L. (1996). Bone art in the Upper Neolithic: Regional, temporal, and art class comparison. Cross-Cultural Research 30: 211–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb J. E. (1998). The archaeology of symbols. Annual Review of Anthropology 27: 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. M., Moore, C. C., and Romney, A. K. (1995). Predicting similarity in material culture among New Guinea villages from propinquity and language: A log-linear approach. Current Anthropology 36: 769–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelach, G. (2002). Apples and oranges? A cross-cultural comparison of burial data from northeast China. Journal of East Asian Archaeology 3: 53–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A. (1988). The Collapse of Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehrani, J., and Collard, M. (2002). Investigating cultural evolution through biological phylogenetic analyses of Turkmen textiles. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 21: 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (2003). Artifacts and Ideas: Essays in Archaeology, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanPool, T. L., and VanPool, C. S. (eds.) (2003). Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D., and Gillings, M. (2002). Spatial Technology and Archaeology: The Archaeological Applications of GIS, Taylor and Francis, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., Henrickson, R. C., and Blackman, M. J. (1999). Displayed or concealed? Cross cultural evidence for symbolic and ritual activity depositing Iron Age animal bones. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18: 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelman, M. J. (1990). Shamans and other "magico-religious" healers: A cross-cultural study of their origins, nature, and social transformations. Ethos 18: 308–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelman, M. J. (1998). Aztec human sacrifice: Cross-cultural assessment of the ecological hypothesis. Ethnology 37: 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffee, N., and Cowgill, G. L. (eds.) (1988). The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilizations, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peregrine, P.N. Cross-Cultural Approaches in Archaeology: Comparative Ethnology, Comparative Archaeology, and Archaeoethnology. Journal of Archaeological Research 12, 281–309 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JARE.0000040232.61243.89

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JARE.0000040232.61243.89

Navigation