Skip to main content
Log in

Reframing Doctoral Programs: A Program of Human Inquiry for Doctoral Students and Faculty Advisors

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Program of Human Inquiry is proposed as a structure to support scholarly inquiry by graduate students and faculty advisors. The Program provides a foundation that acknowledges human experiences and connects them to program aims in ways that do not limit student and faculty options. It promotes communication among student, committee members, and committee chair, as well as dialogue with oneself. It consists of four components. The first component is an acknowledgment of what one brings to graduate studies. The second component includes a Plan of Study, a summary of coursework, field experiences, formal exam dates, and residency. A third component records rigorous, but negotiated, “avenues of inquiry” including coursework, readings, research, and conferences. Finally, the Program encourages an ongoing discussion of values and recording of appropriate experiences. This proposal will interest students who wish to get the most out of their graduate experience and faculty who desire to continually re-examine their advising, their graduate program, and their own learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateson, M. C. (1994). Peripheral visions: Learning along the way. New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, L. M., Hultgren, F. H., Lee, D., Rivken, M. S., Roderick, J. A., & Aoki, T. (1991). Toward curriculum for being: Voices of educators. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cech, T. R. (1999). Science at liberal arts colleges: A better education? Daedalus, 128, 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C., Moss, P. A., Goering, S., Herter, R. J., Lamar, B., Leonard, D., Robbins, S., Russell, M., Templin, M., & Wascha, K. (1996). Collaboration as dialogue: Teachers and researchers engaged in conversation and professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 193–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, R. (1995). Designing information technology in the postmodern age: From method to metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damrosch, D. (1995). We scholars: Changing the culture of the university. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1968). Discourse on method and the meditations. Translated by F. E. Sutcliffe. Harmondaworth, Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1988). Human nature and conduct. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.). John Dewey: The middle works of, Volume 14. (pp. 1–227). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published in 1922.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. New York: Putnam's. (Original work published in 1934.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. (1996). Dewey, qualitative thought, and context. Qualitative studies in education, 9, 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, L. F., Green, K. E., Katz, E. L., & Kluever, R. C. (1997). Rethinking the dissertation process: Tackling personal and institutional obstacles. New Directions for Higher Education Series, No. 99. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1974). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. (1985). G. H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (1997). Notebooks of the mind: Explorations of thinking (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V, Weber, R. J., & Minnis, M. (1998). The challenge of studying collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 773–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magner, D. K. (1997, March 21). Small is beautiful for its Ph.D. programs, Washington U. decides. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A14.

  • Magner, D. D. (1999, February 26). Doctoral programs decide that smaller is better. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A12–13.

  • Marsick, V. J. (1998) Transformative learning from experience in the knowledge era. Daedalus, 127, 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1930). Philanthropy from the point of view of ethics, In E. Faris, F. Laune and A, J. Todd (Eds.), Intelligent Philanthropy (pp. 133–148). Chicago.

  • Progoff, I. (1975). At a journal workshop: The basic text and guide for using the Intensive journal. New York: Dialogue House Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. J., & Garrison, J. (1995). Teaching and moral perception. Teachers College Record, 97, pp. 252–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinetar, M. (1998). The mentor's spirit: Life lessons on leadership and the art of encouragement. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. (1988). Draw-and-tell: Reading, writing, listening, speaking, viewing, shaping. Toronto: Annick Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1993). Ignorance in educational research: or, How can you not know that? Educational Researcher, 22(5), 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shambaugh, R.N. Reframing Doctoral Programs: A Program of Human Inquiry for Doctoral Students and Faculty Advisors. Innovative Higher Education 24, 295–308 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047416.30089.88

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047416.30089.88

Keywords

Navigation