Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Predation Risk on Habitat Selection by Water Column Fish, Benthic Fish and Crayfish in Stream Pools

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predation risk can affect habitat selection by water column stream fish and crayfish, but little is known regarding effects of predation risk on habitat selection by benthic fish or assemblages of fish and crayfish. I used comparative studies and manipulative field experiments to determine whether, (1) habitat selection by stream fish and crayfish is affected by predation risk, and (2) benthic fish, water column fish, and crayfish differ in their habitat selection and response to predation risk. Snorkeling was used to observe fish and crayfish in, (1) unmanipulated stream pools with and without large smallmouth bass predators (Micropterus dolomieui >200 mm total length, TL) and (2) manipulated stream pools before and after addition of a single large smallmouth bass, to determine if prey size and presence of large fish predators affected habitat selection. Observations of microhabitat use were compared with microhabitat availability to determine microhabitat selection. Small fish (60–100 mm TL, except darters that were 30–100 mm TL) and crayfish (40–100 mm rostrum to telson length; TL) had significantly reduced densities in pools with large bass, whereas densities of large fish and crayfish (> 100 mm TL) did not differ significantly between pools with and without large bass. Small orangethroat darters (Etheostoma spectabile), northern crayfish (Orconectes virilis), and creek chubs (Semotilus atromaculatus) showed significantly greater densities in pools without large bass. The presence of large smallmouth bass did not significantly affect depths selected by fish and crayfish, except minnows, which were found significantly more often at medium depths when bass were present. Small minnows and large and small crayfish showed the greatest response to additions of bass to stream pools by moving away from bass locations and into shallow water. Small darters and sunfish showed an intermediate response, whereas large minnows showed no significant response to bass additions. Response to predation risk was dependent on prey size and species, with preferred prey, crayfish and small minnows, showing the greatest response. Small benthic fish, such as darters, are intermediate between small water column fish and crayfish and large water column fish in their risk of predation from large smallmouth bass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armbruster, J.W. & L.M. Page,1996.Convergence of a cryptic saddle pattern in benthic freshwater shes.Envi-ronmental Biology of Fishes 45:249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M.A. & P.J.B. Hart,1993.Habitat preferences and survival of juvenile signal cray sh,Pacifastacus leniusculus-the influence of water depth,substratum,predatory sh and gravid female cray sh.In Holdich, D.M. & G.F. Warner (eds),Freshwater Cray sh IX.University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette,LA,USA:318–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.R. & P.B. Moyle,1991.Changes in habitat and microhabitat partitioning within an assemblage of stream shes in response to predation by Sacramento squaw sh (Ptychocheilus grandis ).Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:849–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P. & D.R. Anderson,1998.Model Selection and Inference:a Practical Information-theoretic Approach. Springer, New York,353 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T.,D.R. Anderson, K.P. Burnham & J.L. La-ake,1993.Distance Sampling:Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.Chapman & Hall, London,446 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T.,K.P. Burnham & N.H. Augustin,1997. Model selection:an integral part of inference.Biometrics 53: 603–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries, D.R.,1990.Habitat use by bluegill in laboratory pools:where is the refuge when macrophytes are sparse and alternative prey are present?Environmental Biology of Fishes 29:27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, M.R.,W.B. Richardson & S.J. Zigler,1997.Patterns of foraging and distribution of bluegill sun sh in a Missis-sippi River backwater:influence of macrophytes and pre-dation.Ecology of Freshwater Fish 6:8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund,G.1999.Effects of sh on the local abundance of cray sh in stream pools.Oikos 87:48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund,G. & J.J. Krupa,2000.Habitat use by cray sh in stream pools:influence of predators,depth and body size. Freshwater Biology 43:75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensign, W.E.,P.L. Angermeier & C.A. Dollo,1995.Use of line transect methods to estimate abundance of benthic stream shes.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K.D. & R.J. White,1981.Competition between brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis )and brown trout (Salmo trutta ) for positions in a Michigan stream.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:1220–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D.F. & R.D. Cerri,1982.Experimental evaluation of predator-prey relationships in a patchy environment:con-sequences for habitat use patterns in minnows.Ecology 63: 307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D.F. & J.F. Gilliam,1992.Nonlethal impacts of predator invasion:facultative suppression of growth and reproduction.Ecology 73:959–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D. & M.C. Freeman,1987.Microhabitat use in a stream sh assemblage.Journal of Zoology 212:151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D.,R.E. Ratajczak,Jr & M.K. Crawford,1995. Do rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris )induce microhabitat shifts in mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi )?Copeia 1995:343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B.C.,1991.Interactions among stream shes:preda-tor-induced habitat shifts and larval survival.Oecologia 87: 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B.C. & A.J. Stewart,1991.Fish size and habitat depth relationships in headwater streams.Oecologia 87:336–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B.C.,R.C. Cashner & W.J. Matthews,1988.Dif-ferential effects of largemouth and smallmouth bass on habitat use by stoneroller minnows in stream pools.Journal of Fish Biology 33:481–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M.S.,1975.Flow-duration and low-frequency deter-minations of selected Arkansas streams.USGS Water Re-sources Circular No.12,Arkansas Geological Commission, Little Rock, AR,USA,57 pp.

  • Kershner, M.W. & D.M. Lodge,1995.Effects of littoral habitat and sh predation on the distribution of an exotic cray sh,Orconectes rusticus.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 14:414–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W.M. & D.R. Helms,1964.Vulnerability of forage organisms to largemouth bass.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 93:315–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D.M. & A.M. Hill,1994.Factors governing species composition,population size,and productivity of cool-water cray shes.Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 69:111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonzarich, D.G. & T.P. Quinn,1995.Experimental evidence for the effect of depth and structure on the distribution, growth,and survival of stream shes.Canadian Journal of Zoology 73:2223–2230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magoulick, D.D.,2000.Spatial and temporal variation in sh assemblages of drying stream pools:the role of abiotic and biotic factors.Aquatic Ecology 34:29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, M.E. & R.A. Stein,1993.Direct and indirect effects of sh predation on the replacement of a native cray sh by an invading congener.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:1279–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W.J.,1998.Patterns in Freshwater Fish Ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York,756.

  • Matthews, W.J.,B.C. Harvey & M.E. Power,1994.Spatial and temporal patterns in the sh assemblages of individual pools in a midwestern stream (USA).Environmental Biology of Fishes 39:381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, C.C. & W.E. Odum,1988.Food,predation risk,and microhabitat selection in a marsh sh assemblage.Ecology 69:1341–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, D.L.,B.N. Futrell & A.Sih,1990.An experimental study on the effects of cray sh on the predator-prey inter-action between bass and sculpin.Oecologia 85:69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miltner, R.J.,S.W. Ross & M.H. Posey,1995.Influence of food and predation on the depth distribution of juvenile spot (Leiostomus xanthurus )in tidal nurseries.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:971–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittlebach, G.G.,1988.Competition among refuging sun shes and effects of sh density on littoral zone invertebrates. Ecology 69:614–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. & D.M. Baltz,1985.Microhabitat use by an assemblage of California stream shes:developing criteria for instream flow determinations.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 114:695–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.ieger, W.L.,1996.The Cray shes of Missouri.Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City,152.

  • Power, M.E.,1984.Depth distributions of armored cat sh: predator-induced resource avoidance?Ecology 65:523–528.

  • Power, M.E.,1987.Predator avoidance by grazing stream shes in temperate and tropical streams:importance of stream depth and prey size.In Kerfoot, W.C. & A.Sih (eds), Predation:Direct and Indirect Impacts in Aquatic Com-munities.University Press of New England, Hanover,NH, USA:333–351.

  • Power, M.E. & W.J. Matthews,1983.Algae-grazing minnows (Campostoma anomalum ),piscivorus bass (Micropterus spp.), and the distribution of attached algae in a small prairie-margin stream.Oecologia 60:328–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M.E.,W.J. Matthews & A.Stewart,1985.Grazing minnows,piscivorous bass,and stream algae:dynamics of a strong interaction.Ecology 66:1448–1456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, W.E.,C.F. Rabeni, W.G. Covington & R.E. Mar-teney,1984.Resource use by stream-dwelling rock bass and smallmouth bass.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C.F.,1992.Trophic linkage between stream centrar-chids and their cray sh prey.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:1714–1721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahel, F.J. & R.A. Stein,1988.Complex predator-prey in-teractions and predator intimidation among cray sh,pisci-vorous sh,and small benthic sh.Oecologia 75:94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resetarits, W.J.Jr,1991.Ecological interactions among pre-dators in experimental stream communities.Ecology 72: 1782–1793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, H.W. & T.M. Buchanan,1988.Fishes of Arkansas.University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville,AR,536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savino, J.F. & R.A. Stein,1989.Behavior of sh predators and their prey:habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation.Environmental Biology of Fishes 24:287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I.J.,1982.Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream.Ecolog-ical Monographs 52:395–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I.J.,1987a.A conceptual framework for sh com-munities in small warmwater streams.In Matthews, W.J.& D.C. Heins (eds),Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes.University of Oklahoma Press, Norman,OK,USA:17–24.

  • Schlosser, I.J.,1987b.The role of predation in age-and size-related habitat use by stream shes.Ecology 68:651–659.

  • Schlosser, I.J.,1988a.Predation rates and the behavioral re-sponse of adult brassy minnows Hybognathus hankinsoni to creek chub and smallmouth bass predators.Copeia 1988: 691–698.

  • Schlosser, I.J.,1988b.Predation risk and habitat selection by two size classes of a stream cyprinid:experimental test of a hypothesis.Oikos 52:36–40.

  • Soderback,B.,1994.Interactions among juveniles of two freshwater cray sh species and predatory sh.Oecologia 100:229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R.A. & J.J. Magnuson,1976.Behavioral response of cray sh to a sh predator.Ecology 57:751–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. & D.J. Hall,1988.Ontogenetic habitat shifts in bluegill:the foraging rate-predation risk trade-o. Ecology 69:1352–1366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA (Tel.:

    Daniel D. Magoulick

Authors
  1. Daniel D. Magoulick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magoulick, D.D. Effects of Predation Risk on Habitat Selection by Water Column Fish, Benthic Fish and Crayfish in Stream Pools. Hydrobiologia 527, 209–221 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000043302.32382.59

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000043302.32382.59

Search

Navigation