Skip to main content
Log in

Clonal Propagation of Dwarf Raspberry (Rubus pubescens Raf.) through in vitro Axillary Shoot Proliferation

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A protocol for the micropropagation of dwarf raspberry (Rubus pubescens) was developed by the establishment of axenic shoot cultures from greenhouse-grown plants, induction of shoot proliferation, and rooting in vitro. Cultures were initiated from shoot tip and nodal explants on 1/2 strength MS (Murashige T. and Skoog F. 1962. Physiol. Plant. 15:473) macro-salts and MS micro-salts and vitamins containing 8.9 μM N 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 0.98 μM indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). Zeatin was more effective than BA, and induced proliferation of about 1.5–2 times as many shoots as BA in combination with 0.54–1.1 μM α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) or 0.49–0.98 μM IBA. With higher zeatin, shoots did not expand and had a high mortality rate. Shoots growing for more than 10 weeks on medium that contained 9.1 μM zeatin occasionally produced adventitious shoot masses, which appeared to arise from dense calluses growing at the base of the shoots in the medium. Shoots were rooted in vitro in the same medium used for shoot proliferation, but without any growth regulators. Almost all (85–90%)in vitro plantlets survived when transferred to potting medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson W.C. 1980. Tissue culture propagation of red and black raspberry Rubus idaeus and R. occidentalis. Acta Hort. 112: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrowski V.L., Mello-Farias P.C. and Peters J.A. 1996. Micropropagation of blackberries (Rubus sp.) cultivars. Rev. Bras. de Agrociência 2: 17–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome O.C. and Zimmerman R.H. 1978. In vitro propagation of blackberry. HortScience 13: 151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler C.K. and Draper A.D. 1986. Effect of zeatin and 2iP on shoot proliferation of three highbush blueberry clones in vitro. HortScience 21: 1065–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline M.G. 1994. The role of hormones in apical dominance: new approaches to an old problem. Physiol. Plant. 90: 230–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debnath S.C. 2003a. Micropropagation of small fruits. In: Jain S.M. and Ishii K. (eds), Micropropagation of Woody Trees and Fruits. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 465–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debnath S.C. 2003b. Improved shoot organogenesis from hypocotyl segments of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 39: 490–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debnath S.C. and McRae K.B. 2001a. In vitro culture of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.): the influence of cytokinins and media types on propagation. Small Fruits Rev. 1: 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debnath S.C. and McRae K.B. 2001b. An efficient in vitro shoot propagation of cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) by axillary bud proliferation. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 37: 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Fossard R.A. 1986. Principles of plant tissue culture. In: Zimmerman R.J., Griesbach R.J., Hammerschlag F.A. and Lawson R.H. (eds), Tissue Culture as a Plant Production System for Horticultural Crops. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly D.J. and Daubeny H.A. 1986. Tissue culture of Rubus species. Acta Hort. 183: 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccher T. and Noè N. 1989. Comparison between 2iP and zeatin in the micropropagation of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Acta Hort. 441: 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez G.E. and Clark J.R. 1991. In vitro propagation of the erect thornless 'Navaho' blackberry. HortScience 26: 1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finne Å 1986. Micropropagation of Rubus spp. J. Agric. Sci. Finland 58: 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • George E.F. and Sherrington P.D. 1984. Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. Exegetics Ltd., Reading, England.

  • Gonzales M.V., Lopez M., Valdes A.E. and Ordas R.J. 2000. Micropropagation of three berry fruit species using nodal segments from field-grown plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 137: 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriadou K., Vasilakakis M. and Eleftheriou E.P. 2002. In vitro propagation of the Greek olive cultivar 'Chondrolia Chalkidikis'. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 71: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper P.C. 1978. Tissue culture propagation of blackberry and tayberry. Hort. Res. 18: 141–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoepfner A.S. 1989. In vitro propagation of red raspberry. Acta Hort. 262: 285–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • James D.J., Knight V.H. and Thurbon I.J. 1980. Micropropagation of red raspberry and the influence of phloroglucinol. Scientia Hort. 12: 313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss F. and Zatyko J. 1978. Vegetative propagation of Rubus species in vitro. Botanika Kozlemenyek 65: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin P.J. and Scowcroft W.R. 1981. Somaclonal variation-a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60: 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman D. 1998. Native American Ethnobotany. Timber Press, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T. and Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyott J.L. and Converse R.H. 1981. In vitro propagation of heat treated red raspberry clones. HortScience 3: 308–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed B.M. 1990. Multiplication of Rubus germplasm in vitro: a screen of 256 accessions. Fruit Var. J. 44: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed B.M. and Abdelnour-Esquivel A. 1991. The use of zeatin to initiate in vitro cultures of Vaccinium species and cultivars. HortScience 26: 1320–1322.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 2001. SAS System for Windows. Release 8.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

  • Skirvin R.M., Chu M.C. and Gomez E. 1981. In vitro propagation of thornless trailing blackberries. HortScience 16: 310–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobczykiewicz D. 1987. Mass propagation of raspberry plants by meristem culture. Acta Hort. 212: 607–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobczykiewicz D. 1992. Micropropagation of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). In: Bajaj Y.P.S. (ed.), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 18. High-tech and Micropropagation II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertesy J. 1979. Experiments on the production of virus-free raspberry propagation material by meristem culture. Acta Hort. 95: 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welander M. 1982. Micropropagation of raspberry and current (in Swedish). In: Rep. Balsgård Fruit Breeding Inst., 1980-81, pp. 102–115.

  • Welander M. 1987. In vitro culture of raspberry (Rubus idaeus) for mass propagation and virus elimination. Acta Hort. 212: 610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman R.H., Galetta G.J. and Broome O.C. 1980. Propagation of thornless blackberries by one-node cuttings. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105: 405–407.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debnath, S.C. Clonal Propagation of Dwarf Raspberry (Rubus pubescens Raf.) through in vitro Axillary Shoot Proliferation. Plant Growth Regulation 43, 179–186 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GROW.0000040110.53216.6a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GROW.0000040110.53216.6a

Navigation