Skip to main content
Log in

Childrearing Responsibility and Stepfamily Fertility in Finland and Austria

  • Published:
European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the hypothesis that the propensity of a step family couple to have a shared child is inversely related to the responsibility for rearing pre-union children. We compare effects of coresident pre-union children to those of nonresident, and effects of the woman's children to those of the man's. Shared children and stepchildren reduce the risk of a birth to a couple, and the reduction is larger for each shared child than for a stepchild. We find larger effects of coresident pre-union children than of nonresident children, and larger effects of a woman's pre-union children than of a man's. The differences are more pronounced in Austria where public support for childrearing and gender equality is lower than in Finland. Our study demonstrates that in addition to the number of pre-union children, coresidence and parentage of pre-union children also need to be considered in future fertility research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bittman,M., 1999. 'Parenthood without penalty: time use and public policy in Australia and Finland'. Feminist Economics 5(3): 27-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buber-Ennser, I., 2003. 'The influence of the distribution of household and childrearing tasks between men and women on childbearing intentions in Austria'. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2003: 165-180.

  • Buber, I. and Prskawetz, A., 2000a. 'Fertility in second unions in Austria: findings from the Austrian FFS'. Demographic Research 3(2). Available at http://www.demographic-research.org/ Volumes/Vol3/2/3-2.pdf.

  • Buber, I. and Prskawetz, A., 2000b. 'Current demographic trends in Austria', in T. Kucera, O. V. Kucerova, O. B. Opara and E. Schaich (eds), New Demographic Faces of Europe. Berlin: Springer, 1-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, M. and Charles, M., 1995. 'Organizational and institutional factors in the process of gender stratification: comparing social arrangements in six European countries'. International Journal of Sociology 25(2), 66-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forssén, K., 1998. Children, Families and the Welfare State: Studies on the Outcomes of the Finnish Family Policy. Helsinki: STAKES Research Reports, No. 92, STAKES-National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health, 178 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frejka, T. and Calot, G., 2001. 'Cohort reproductive patterns in the Nordic countries'. Demographic Research 5(5). Available at http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol5/5/5-5.pdf.

  • Gisser, R. et al., 1995. Familie und Familienpolitik in Österreich. Wissen, Einstellungen, offene Wünsche, internationaler Vergleich. Vienna: Forschungsbericht, Bundesministerium für Jugend und Familie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. D., Koo, H. P. and Suchindran, C. M., 1985. 'Childbearing and family in remarriage'. Demography 22: 73-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henz, U., 2002. 'Childbirth in East and West German stepfamilies: estimated probabilities from hazard rate models'. Demographic Research 7(6). Available at http://www.demographicresearch. org/Volumes/Vol7/6/7-6.pdf.

  • Hoem, J. M., Prskawetz, A. and Neyer, G., 2001. 'Autonomy or conservative adjustment? The effect of public policies and educational attainment on third births in Austria'. Population Studies 55: 249-261 (Published with appendices in MPIDR working-paper WP 2001-016, available at http://www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/Working/wp-2001-016.pdf).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, R. and Säntti, R., 2000. Uusperheitten lapset ja vanhemmat: Perheitten rakenne, toiminta ja talous [Parental Responsibility for Children in Reconstituted Families]. Publications of the Finnish National Research Institute of Legal Policy, No. 174, 96 pp.

  • Lillard, L. A. and Panis, C. W. A., 2000. aML Multilevel Multiprocess Statistical Software Release 1.0. EconWare, Los Angeles, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P., 2000. 'Gender equity in theories of fertility transition'. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427-439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyer, G., 1991. Risiko oder Sicherheit. Mutterschutzleistungen in Oesterreich. Forschungsberichte aus Sozial-und Arbeitsmarktpolitik 38 [Risk or security? Maternity-leave Regulations in Austria]. Research Reports of Social and Labor Market Policy, 38.

  • Neyer, G., 2003. 'Austria: introduction', in: P. Flora and Th. Bahle (eds), Family Change and Family Policies in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikander, T., 1998. Fertility and Family Surveys in Countries of the ECE Region, Standard Country Report, Finland. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oláh, L., 2001. 'The first shared birth in second unions in Sweden and Hungary: a gender perspective', in: L. Oláh (ed), Gendering Family Dynamics: The Case of Sweden and Hungary. Stockholm University Demography Unit-Dissertation Series, 3.

  • Prinz, C., Lutz, W., Nowak, V. and Pfeiffer, C., 1998. Fertility and Family Surveys in Countries of the ECE Region, Standard Country Report. Austria/New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prskawetz, A., Vikat, A., Philipov, D. and Engelhardt, H., 2003. 'Pathways to stepfamily formation in Europe: results from the FFS'. Demographic Research 8(5). Available at http://www. demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol8/5/8-5.pdf.

  • Rendall, M. S., Clarke, L., Peters, H. E., Ranjit, N. and Verropoulou, G., 1999. 'Incomplete reporting of men's fertility in the United States and Britain: a research note'. Demography 36(1): 135-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rønsen, M. and Sundström, M., 2002. 'Family policy and after birth employment among new mothers-a comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden'. European Journal of Population 18: 121-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunter-Kleemann, S., 1992. 'Wohlfahrtsstaat und Patriarchat-Ein Vergleich europäischer Länder', in: S. Schunter-Kleemann (ed), Herrenhaus Europa-Geschlechterverhältnisse im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Berlin: Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J. A. and Bianchi, S. M., 1988. 'Children's contact with absent parents'. Journal of Marriage and the Family 50: 663-677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipilä, J., 1995. 'The right to choose: day care for children or money for parents', in: R. Page and J. Baldock (eds), Social Policy Review 6. Canterbury: Social Policy Association, 151-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Insurance Institution, 2000. Statistical Yearbook of the Social Insurance Institution 1999. Helsinki: KELA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Finland, 1994. Suomalainen perhe [The Finnish Family]. Population, 5. Finland: Statistics Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • vaki1751.xls.

  • uebersichten/deutsch/pdf/k14t_5.pdf.

  • Stewart, S. D., 2002. 'The effect of stepchildren on childbearing intentions and births'. Demography 39(1), 181-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S. D., Manning, W. D. and Smock, P. J., 2003. 'Union formation among men in the US: does having prior children matter?'. Journal of Marriage and the Family 65(1): 90-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, E., 1997. Her, His and Their Children: Influences on Couple Childbearing Decisions. Madison: National Survey of Families and Households Working Paper #76, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/cde/nsfhwp/nsfh76.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, E., Hoem, J. M., Vikat, A., Prskawetz, A., Buber, I., Toulemon, L., Henz, U., Godecker, A. L. and Kantorova, V., 2002. 'Childbearing in stepfamilies: how parity matters', in: E. Klijzing and M. Corijn (eds), Fertility and Partnership in Europe: Insights and Lessons from Comparative Research. Geneva/New York: United Nations, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, E. and Li, J.-C. A., 2002. Her, His and Their Children: Childbearing Intentions and Births in Stepfamilies. Madison, WI: National Survey of Families and Households Working Paper 89, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available online at www.ssc.wisc.edu/cde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulemon, L., 1997. The Fertility of Step-families: The Impact of Childbearing before the Current Union. Washington, DC: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America.

  • Tyyskä, V., 1995. 'The politics of caring and the welfare state: the impact of the women's movement on child care policy in Canada and Finland, 1960-1990'. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae Series B 277: 15-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikat, A., 2002. 'Fertility in Finland in the 1980s and 1990s: analysis of fertility trend by age and parity'. Yearbook of Population Research in Finland 38, 159-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikat, A., Thomson, E. and Hoem, J. M., 1999. 'Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: the impact of childbearing before the current union'. Population Studies 53, 211-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres Vikat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vikat, A., Thomson, E. & Prskawetz, A. Childrearing Responsibility and Stepfamily Fertility in Finland and Austria. European Journal of Population 20, 1–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUJP.0000014536.56286.41

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUJP.0000014536.56286.41

Navigation