Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Econometric Analysis of Global Waste Paper Recovery and Utilization

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to provide aneconometric analysis of the most importantdeterminants of inter-country differences inwaste paper recovery and utilization rates. Byemploying pooled time series and cross-sectiondata over 49 countries worldwide and sevenyears, the paper concludes that relative wastepaper recovery and use depend largely onlong-standing economic factors such aspopulation intensity and competitiveness in theworld market for paper and board products. Wealso find evidence that supports the conjecturethat rich countries tend to recover relativelymore waste paper than is the case in low-incomecountries, reflecting the higher demand forwaste management and environmental policies inmore developed economies. As recovery andutilization rates are determined by economicand demographic characteristics the degree ofpolicy flexibility in affecting these rates maybe limited. In particular, an ambitiousutilization rate target may be very costly toenforce as it can conflict with existing tradepatterns of paper and board products as well aswith other environmental goals. Additionalpolicy targets may therefore be desirable,especially since paper recycling is motivatedprimarily by environmental concerns and seldomis a benign activity in itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Forest & Paper Association (2000), Paper Recycling: Statistical Highlights, available at www.afandpa.org/recycling/recycling.html.

  • American Paper Institute (1983), Statistics of Paper, Paperboard & Wood Pulp. New York.

  • American Paper Institute (1991), Statistics of Paper, Paperboard & Wood Pulp. New York.

  • Anderson, R. C. (1977),‘Public Policies Toward the Use of Scrap Materials’ American Economic Review 67, 355-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antti, B. M. (2000), Head of research and development at AssiDomän Kraftliner, Piteå, Sweden, personal communication, 12 February.

  • Arrow, K., B. Bolin, R. Costanza, P. Dasgupta, C. Folke, C. S. Holling, B-O. Jansson, S. Levin, K-G. Mäler, C. Perrings and D. Pimental (1995),‘Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity and the Environment’ Science 268, 520-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. and N. Manning (1995),‘A Survey of International Energy Elasticities’ in A. B. Askin and J. Kraft, eds., Econometric Dimensions of Energy Demand and Supply. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. (1995), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. (1998), Econometrics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. and J. M. Griffin (1984),‘Short and Long-run Effects in Pooled Models’ International Economic Review 25, 631-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, C. and P. Söderholm (2003),‘Complementing Empirical Evidence on Global Recycling and Trade of Waste Paper’ World Development 31(4), 743-754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, C., P. Söderholm and M. Nilsson (2002),‘A Note on Inter-country Differences in Waste Paper Recovery and Utilization’ Resources, Conservation and Recycling 34(3), 175-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaut, T. and G. Steiker (1978), Characteristics of Wastepaper Markets and Trends in Scrap Paper Recycling, Prices, Demand and Availability: A National and Regional Overview, RSRI Discussion Paper Series, No. 103. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A. G. (1996), Essays on Recycling Economics and Policy, Ph.D. dissertation. Graduate School, Boston University.

  • Bruvoll, A. (1998), The Costs of Alternative Policies for Paper and Plastic Waste, Report 98/2. Oslo: Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buclet, N. and O. Godard (2000), Municipal Waste Management in Europe-A Comparative Study in Building Regimes. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byström, S. and L. Lönnstedt (1997),‘Paper Recycling: Environmental and Economic Impact’ Resources, Conservation and Recycling 21, 109-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA (1999), The World Factbook 1999, available at www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index. html.

  • Cointreau, S. J. (1987), Solid Waste Recycling: Case Studies in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D. and S. Weisberg (1982), Residuals and Influences in Regression. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deadman, D. and R. K. Turner (1981),‘Comment: Modeling the Supply of Wastepaper’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8, 100-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Vita, G. (1997),‘Macroeconomic Effects of the Recycling of Waste Derived from Imported Nonrenewable Raw Materials’ Resources Policy 23(4), 179-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, C. (1992), Introduction to Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgren, J. A. and K. W. Moreland (1989),‘An Econometric Analysis of Paper and Wastepaper Markets’ Resources and Energy 11, 299-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (1979),‘Price Expectations and the Supply of Wastepaper’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 6, 332-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA 530-N-96-008. Reusable News Bulletin. United States Environmental Protection Agency. June/July 1996.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1996),‘European Timber Trends and Prospects: Into the 21st Century’ Geneva Timber and Forest Study Papers, No. 11. New York: United Nations Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2001), FAO Statistical Databases, available at http:// apps.fao.org. New York: United Nations.

  • Gill, G. and K. Lahiri (1980),‘An Econometric Model of Wastepaper Recycling in the U.S.A.’ Resources Policy 6, 434-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, R., R. K. Turner and I. Walter (1978),‘Secondary Materials and International Trade’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 5, 172-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (1993), Econometric Analysis, Second Edition. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. and A. Krueger (1995),‘Economic Growth and the Environment’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(2), 353-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (1978),‘Specification Tests in Econometrics’ Econometrica 46, 1251-1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, J., J. Cherian, M. Madansky and C. Narayana (1995),‘Determinants of Recycling Behavior: A Synthesis of Research Results’ The Journal of Socio-Economics 24(1), 105-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhtala, A. and E. Samakovlis (1999),‘Does International Harmonization of Environmental Policy Instruments Make Economic Sense? The Case of Paper Recycling in Europe’ Working Paper No. 65. Stockholm: National Institute of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ince, P. (1995),‘What Won't Get Harvested Where and When: The Effects of Increased Paper Recycling on Timber Harvest’ Working Paper No. 3. New Haven, U.S.A.: School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. R., S. A. Martinez, K. Palmer and M. J. Podolsky (1999),‘The Determinants of Household Recycling: AMaterial Specific Analysis of Unit Pricing and Recycling Program Attributes’ Discussion Paper 99-41. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M. E. (1998),‘A Household Level Environmental Kuznets Curve’ Economics Letters 59(2), 269-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriström, B. and P. Riera (1996),‘Is the Income Elasticity of Environmental Improvements Less Than One’, Environmental and Resource Economics 7, 45-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. G. and H. White (1985),‘Some Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimators with Improved Finite Sample Properties’ Journal of Econometrics 29, 305-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. A. (1998),‘Recycling, International Trade, and the Distribution of Pollution: The Effect of Increased U.S. Paper Recycling on U.S. Import Demand for Canadian Paper’ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30 (July), 217-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestor, D. V. (1992),‘Partial Static Equilibrium Model of Newsprint Recycling’ Applied Economics 24, 411-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1976), Prospects and Policies for Waste Paper Recycling in the Pulp and Paper Industry. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1979), Wastepaper Recovery. Economic Aspects and Environmental Impacts. Paris.

  • Pulp & Paper International (1998), International Fact & Price Book 1998.

  • Pulp & Paper International (1999), International Fact & Price Book 1999.

  • Radetzki, M. (2000), Fashions in the Treatment of Packaging Waste: An Economic Analysis of the Swedish Producer Responsibility Legislation. Brentwood: Multi-Science Publishing Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. and N. Johnstone (1996), Transport in the Paper Cycle: Towards a Sustainable Paper Cycle. Sub-Study Series No. 12, International Institute for Environment and Development.

  • Samakovlis, E. (2001), Economics of Paper Recycling: Efficiency, Policies and Substitution Possibilities, Umeå Economic Studies No. 563. Sweden: Department of Economics, Umeå University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schall, J. (1992), Does the Solid Waste Management Hierarchy Make Sense? Working Paper No. 1, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University.

  • Selden, T. M. and D. Song (1994),‘Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 147-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1997), The U.S. Paper Industry and Sustainable Production. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Forest Industries Federation (2000), Waste Paper Statistics, available at www.forest industries.se/oh/index.cfm.

  • Van Beukering, P. J. H. (1994),‘An Economic Analysis of Different Types of Formal and Informal Entrepreneurs, Recovering Urban Solid Waste in Bangalore (India)’ Resources, Conservation and Recycling 12(3-4), 229-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beukering, P. J. H. and M. N. Bouman (2001),‘Empirical Evidence on Recycling and Trade of Paper and Lead in Developed and Developing Countries’ World Development 29(10), 1717-1737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beukering, P. J. H. and M. N. Bouman (2003),‘Complementing Empirical Evidence on Global Recycling and Trade of Waste Paper: A Reply’ forthcoming in World Development 31(4).

  • Van Beukering, P. J. H. and V. K. Sharma (1996), International Trade and Recycling in Developing Countries: The Case of Waste Paper Trade in India, IVM Report No. W96/29. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije University.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980),‘A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity’ Econometrica 48, 817-838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, A. C. (1990), U.S. Wastepaper Recycling Policies: Issues and Effects, ENR 90-14. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992), World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1995), World Development Report 1995: Workers in an Integrated World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1998), World Development Indicators, CD-ROM. Washington, DC.

  • World Bank (2001), World Bank Classification of Economies. Washington, DC: available at www. worldbank.org/data/archive/wdi/class.htm.

  • Yohe, G. W. (1979),‘Secondary Materials and International Trade: A Comment on the Domestic Market’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 6, 199-203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Economics, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87, Luleå, Sweden

    Christer Berglund & Patrik Söderholm

Authors
  1. Christer Berglund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrik Söderholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berglund, C., Söderholm, P. An Econometric Analysis of Global Waste Paper Recovery and Utilization. Environmental and Resource Economics 26, 429–456 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000003595.60196.a9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000003595.60196.a9

Search

Navigation