Skip to main content
Log in

On Linking Business Ethics, Bioethics and Bioterrorism

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 20th century produced overwhelming advances in biomedicine with the 1990s introducing 148,000 patents as part of the mapping and sequencing of the human genome. Bioethical realities and debates of prenatal genetic testing, new reproductive technologies, stem cell research, human cloning and DNA data banks have obscured the less provocative public and social issues of gun control, immunization, employee leave programs to assist care for dying relatives, emergency room use as primary care sites by the uninsured, and medical care provision to the homeless. With the events of September 11, the focus has shifted to bioterrorism: an international and global concern that portends broad environmental consequences while requiring a local, community response of which the business enterprise is a part. The tension that results from a required local and global response to bioterrorism and biotechnology by the business community forms a dialectic and provides a venue for addressing business ethics in an international forum. This paper explores the relationship of events and its meaning for business. Part I provides the background of biotechnology and bioterrorism and how the two form a dialectic reality that shapes ethical debate. Part II presents provocations and questions for an emerging ethic based on the integrative response from the public health, medical, business and religious communities. Four areas for business contribution in shaping emerging ethics in the age of biotechnology—bioterrorism are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Hospital Association/Management Advisory: 2001, Ethical Conduct for Healthcare Institutions, http://www.aha.org.

  • Andolson, B.: 2001, ‘Roman Catholic Tradition and Ritual and Business Ethics: A Feminist Perspective’, in S. Herman (ed.), Spiritual Goods: Faith Traditions and the Practice of Business (Philosophy Documentation Center), pp. 69–85.

  • Annas, G.: 1998, Some Choice: Law, Medicine and The Market (Oxford University Press, NY).

  • Armstrong, M. and C. Bennett: 2001, The Road to Sustainability: Business' First Steps (The Conference Board, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnhart, L.: 1998, Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature (State University of New York Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Avoiding a Dark Winter: 2001, The Economist (October 27), 29–30.

  • Bartlett, J., T. O'Toole, T. Inglesby and M. Mair: 2002, Bioterrorism and Public Health (Thomson Medical Economics, NJ), www.eMedquides.com/bioterrorism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, D. and B. Steinbock: 1999, New Ethics for the Public's Health (Oxford University Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardin, J.: 1998, A Moral Vision for America (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, J. and T. Costello: 1994, Global Village or Global Pillage: Economic Reconstruction from the Bottom Up (South End Press, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt, M. and C. Sharda: 2000, The Business Interest in a Community's Health, Washington Business Group on Health (WBGH) prepared for the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

  • Brock, B.: 1972, Methods of Rhetorical Criticism (Wayne State University Press, MI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B.: 1999, ‘Protecting Human Dignity and the Patenting of Human Genes’, In A. Chapman (ed.), Perspectives on Genetic Patenting: Religion, Science and Industry in Dialogue (AAAS Publishing, Washington, DC), pp. 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, S.: 2001, ‘Clear and Present Danger?’ Washington Post (October 28): W8.

  • Burrows, B.: 1997, ‘Second Thoughts About Patent #4,438,032’, Bulletin of Medical Ethics 124, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D.: 1998, False Hopes: Why America's Quest for Perfect Health Is A Recipe for Failure (Simon & Schuster, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C.: 2001, ‘Meaningful Resistance: Religion and Biotechnology’, in M. Hanson (ed.), Claiming Power Over Life (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC), pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centesimus Annus: On the Hundredth Anniversary of Rerum Novarum, John Paul II: 1991, United States Catholic Conference, Washington, DC.

  • Chapman, A.: 2001, ‘Religious Perspectives on Biotechnology’, in M. Hanson (ed.), Claiming Power Over Life (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC), pp. 112–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.: 2000, Human Natures: Genes, Cultures, and the Human Prospect (Island Press/Shearwater Books, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J.: 2001, The Chrysalis Economy: How Citizen CEOs and Corporations Can Fuse Values and Value Creation (Capstone, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C.: 1999, Bioethics, Culture and Identity: A Philosophical Disease (Routledge, NY).

  • Foss, S., K. Foss and R. Trapp: 1985, Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric (Waveland Press, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B.: 2001, ‘Corporate Responsibility and Human Rights’, http://www.globaldimesnions.net.

  • French, P.: 1979, ‘The Corporation as a Moral Person’, American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F.: 1995, Trust (Macmillan, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F.: 2002, Our Postmodern Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution (FSG, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M.: 1991, Rights Talk (The Free Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M.: 2001, ‘The Sources of Rights Talk: Some are Catholic’, Commonweall (October 12), 11–13.

  • Goodpaster, K.: 1982, ‘Morality and Organizations’, in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business, 2nd Edition (Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 137–145.

  • Greenleaf, R.: 1977, Servant Leadership (Paulist Press, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M.: 2001, Claiming Power Over Life: Religion and Biotechnology Policy (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haring, B.: 1987, ‘The Physician—Patient Relationship’, in S. Lammers and A. Verhey (eds.), On Moral Medicine: Theological Perspectives in Medical Ethics (Eerdmans, MI), pp. 544–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitman, E.: 1995, ‘Infertility As a Public Health Problem: Why Assisted Reproductive Technologies Are Not The Answer’, Stanford Law Policy Rev. 6, 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. A.: 1998, ‘Bioterrorism as a Public Health Threat’, Emerging Infectious Disease V4, N3, July–September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M.: 2002, ‘Business and Environmental Ethics’, in E. Heath, (ed.), Morality and the Markets: Ethics and Virtue in the Conduct of Business (McGraw-Hill, MA), pp. 667–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, J.: 2003, On This Journey We Call Our Life: Living the Questions (Inner City Press, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanaugh, J.: 2001, Who Count as Persons? Human Identity and the Ethics of Killing' (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, M.: 1988, A Social Contract Theory of Organizations (Notre Dame University Press, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D.: 2001, Local Insights, Global Ethics (Rodopi).

  • Korey, W.: 1998, NGOs and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (St. Martin's Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D.: 2001, When Corporations Rule The World (Berrett-Koehler, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laborem Exercens: On Human Work, Third Encyclical Letter. John Paul II: 1981.

  • Lebacqz, K.: 1987, ‘Bioethics: Some Challenges from a Liberation Perspective’, in S. Lammers and A. Verhey (eds.), On Moral Medicine: Theological Perspectives in Medical Ethics (Eerdmans, MI), pp. 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, A.: 1991, ‘Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequities’, American Journal of Law and Medical XVII, 19–36; 44-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J.: 1999, ‘Medicine and Public Health, Ethics and Human Rights’, in D. Beauchamp, and B. Steinbock (eds), New Ethics for the Public's Health (Oxford University Press, NY), pp. 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, L.: 1987, The Morality of Groups (Notre Dame University Press, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R.: 1990, Kairos: Three Prophetic Challenges to the Church (Brown. Eerdmans Publishing, Grand Rapids, MI).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, D.: 2001, ‘Catholic Social Teaching in an Era of Downsizing: A Resource for Business Ethics’, in S. Herman (ed.), Spiritual Goods: Faith Traditions and the Practice of Business (Philosophy Documentation Center) pp. 87–106.

  • McKenney, G.: 2001, ‘Religion, Biotechnology, and the Integrity of Nature: A Critical Examination’, in M. Hanson (ed.), Claiming Power Over Life (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC), pp. 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, D.: 2002, ‘A Humanistic Framework of the Corporation of the 21st Century’, The Center for Business Ethics (University of St. Thomas, Houston TX).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, D. and A. Sison: 1993, ‘Corporations and the Social Contract: A Reply to Professor Thomas Donaldson’, IESE, University of Navarra, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., S. Engelberg and W. Broad: 2001, Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War (Simon & Schuster, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Navran, F.: 1997, ‘Twenty Steps to Total Ethics Management’, http://www.navran.com/Products/DTG/part07.html.

  • Oce of Business and Human Rights: A Progress Report, Oce of the High Commissioner for Human Rights: 2001, www.unchr.ch/business.htm.

  • Panayotou, T.: 2000, ‘Globalization and Environment’, CID Working Paper No. 53, July, http://www.cid.harvard.edu.

  • Pellegrino, E. and A. Faden (eds.): 1999, Jewish and Catholic Bioethics: An Ecumenical Dialogue, (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M.: 1992, ‘Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions of the Corporation’, Business Ethics Quarterly.

  • Powell, W. and E. Clemens: 1998, Private Action and the Public Good (Yale University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadragesimo Anno: On Reconstruction of the Social Order: 1931, Encyclical of Pope Pius XI.

  • Religious Voices in Biotechnology: The Case of Gene Patenting: 1997, Hastings Center Report, NY.

  • Rerum Novarum: On Capital and Labor: 1891, Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII.

  • Seilheimer, S.: 2002, ‘Cyberterrorism: The Impact of the September 11th Terrorist Attack on Ethical Rights in the Business and Professional Computing Arena’, Ninth Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics (Niagara University, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalala, D.: 1999, ‘Bioterrorism: How Prepared Are We?’, Emerging Infectious Diseases V5, N4, July–August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, T.: 1979, An Introduction to Bioethics, 2nd Edition (Paulist Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, M.: 1994, ‘Defining Privacy in Employee Health Screening Cases: Ethical Ramifications Concerning the Employee/Employer Relationship’, Journal Business Ethics 13, 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, M.: 2004a, ‘Catholic Insight on Workplace Human Rights and Corporate Humanism’, In P. J. Miller and R. Fossey (Eds,), Mapping the Catholic Cultural Landscape (pp. 217-229), Rowman and Littflefiel.

  • Simms, M.: 2003, ‘Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility’, White Paper prepared for the Business Ethics, University of St. Thomas. On-line at www.stthom.edu/cbes.

  • Social Development and World Peace US Conference of Catholic Bishops. www.pernet.net.

  • Spencer, M., A. Mills, M. Rorty and P. Werhane: 2000, Organizational Ethics in Health Care (Oxford University Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Storr, A.: 1983, The Essential Jung (Princeton University Press, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strongin, R.: 2001, ‘Emergency Preparedness from a Health Perspective: Preparing for Bioterrorism at the Federal, State and Local Levels’, Washington, DC: National Health Policy Forum, Georgetown University, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World: World Development Report: 2003, http://www.wbgh.org.

  • Texas Institute of Health Policy Research: 2001, ‘Bioterrorism Preparedness Policy Brief’, December, www.healthpolicyinsititute.org.

  • Tournier, P.: 1957, The Meaning of Persons (Harper and Row, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L.: 1997, ‘Bioethics, Public Health and Firearm-Related Violence: Missing Links Between Bioethics and Public Health’, Journal of Law Medical Ethics 25(1), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Health and Human Services Fact Sheet: 2001, August 16, http://www.hhs.gov.

  • Velasquez, M.: 1983, ‘Why Corporations Are Not Responsible for Anything They Do’, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M.: 2001, ‘Catholic Natural Law and Business Ethics’, in S. Herman (ed.), Spiritual Goods: Faith Traditions and the Practice of Business (Philosophy Documentation Center), pp. 107–140.

  • Verstraeten, J., M. Naughton and S. Beretta: 2001, Work as the Key to the Social Question, www.stthomas.edu/cathstudies.

  • Werhane, P.: 1995, Persons, Rights and Corporations (Prentice-Hall, NJ).

  • Werhane, P.: 1998, ‘Moral Imagination and Management Decision-Making’, Business Ethics Quarterly 8, 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simms, M. On Linking Business Ethics, Bioethics and Bioterrorism. Journal of Business Ethics 51, 211–220 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033614.40676.2f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033614.40676.2f

Navigation