Skip to main content
Log in

Redefining the Scholarship of Business Ethics: An Editorial

  • Editorial Introduction
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, the term "scholarship" has been narrowly defined as discovery-based research. Teaching in higher education, by contrast, is perceived as an intellectually inferior activity. However, the teaching-research divide is a crude distinction which fails to capture the richness of scholarly endeavour in all disciplines. Drawing on Boyer's four forms of scholarship, it is argued that academic work in business ethics needs to be reconceptualised in terms which honour and value all contributions. This special issue of the Journal of Business Ethics, arising from an international conference on the teaching of business ethics, is illustrative of the scholarship of discovery, integration, application and teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Badley, G.: 2002, ‘A Really Useful Link Between Teaching and Research’, Teaching in Higher Education 7(4), 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, R.: 1999, ‘The Scholarship of Teaching: What's the Problem?’, Inventio 1(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T.: 1989, Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, Buckingham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E.: 1990, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J.: 1999, The Teaching of Business Ethics at Redefining the Scholarship of Business Ethics: An Editorial 5 Undergraduate, Postgraduate and Professional Levels in the UK (Institute of Business Ethics, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • French, N. J., W. F. Massey and K. Young: 2001, ‘Research Assessment in Hong Kong’, Higher Education 42(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 2000, ‘Allocating Research Infrastructure Grants in Post-binary Higher Education Systems: British and Australian Approaches’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 22(2), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. T.: 2002, Being a Teacher in Higher Education (The Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, Buckingham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Luijk, H.: 1999, ‘Business Ethics in Europe: A Tale of Two Efforts’, in R. Frederick (ed.), A Companion to Business Ethics (Blackwell, Oxford and Massachusetts), pp. 353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B.: 2003, Teaching with Integrity: The Ethics of Higher Education Practice (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J.: 1998, ‘On Effective Interdisciplinary Alliances in European Business Ethics Research: Discussion and Illustration’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1029–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J.: 2000, ‘Teaching Business Ethics: Are There Differences Within Europe and Is There a European Difference?’, review of Zsolnai, L. (ed.): 1998, ‘The European Difference: Business Ethics in the Community of European Management Schools’, Business Ethics: A European Review 9(1) (January) (Kluwer, Dordrecht), pp. 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talib, A. A.: 2001, ‘The Continuing Behavioral Modification of Academics Since the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise’, Higher Education Review 33(3), 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macfarlane, B., Spence, L.J. Redefining the Scholarship of Business Ethics: An Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics 48, 1–6 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004463.52341.65

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004463.52341.65

Navigation