Skip to main content
Log in

War on foot and mouth disease in the UK, 2001: Towards a cultural understanding of agriculture

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article applies some ofthe insights from framing studies in policyresearch, metaphor analysis, and the history ofmedicine to a cultural understanding ofagriculture, using the 2001 outbreak of footand mouth disease in the UK as a case study.The article will show how metaphors of war wereused as a “rhetorical frame” by the media andas an implicit “action frame” by policy makers.It will be argued that although the war framemight initially have been useful in rallyingsupport for the slaughter policy, the metaphorlater backfired, when a metaphorical war turnedinto a literal holocaust. This might haveencouraged the public to perceive the policy asmedieval, brutal, and misguided, thuspotentially undermining the willingness ofsections of the public to support the slaughterpolicy in future outbreaks. If, on the otherhand, a vaccination policy were adopted in thefuture, care would need to be taken to avoidmetaphorical linkages with other controversiesover vaccination in other domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A Crisis too Far (2001). A social and cultural record of the foot-and-mouth epidemic and its impact on the farming and rural community in the United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.footandmouthdoc.com/ on 15 January 2003.

  • Alexander, J. C. (ed.) (1988). Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, A., M. T. Sinclair, and G. Sugiyarto (2002) Quantifying the impact of Foot and Mouth Disease on tourism and the UK economy. Nottingham University, Business School. Retrieved from http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/ttri on 15 January 2003.

  • Breakwell, G. (2002). Report to DEFRA (Department of the Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs): Public Perceptions Concerning Animal Vaccination: A Case Study of Foot and Mouth Disease. MS.

  • The BSE Inquiry (2000). The report. Retrieved from http:// www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/report/ on February 2003.

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. (1997). “Public eyes and private genes: Historical frames, news constructions, and social problems.” Social Problems 44(2): 139-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwoody, S. (1992). “The media and public perceptions of risk: How journalists frame risk stories.” In D. W. Bromley and K. Segerson (eds.), The Social Response to Environmental Risk (pp. 75-100). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1912). Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, le système totémique en Australie. Paris: PUF, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • topic/ December02/fmd_final_report/ep_temp_comm_fmd_rep.htm on 15 January 2003.

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1997). Narrative, moral identity and historical consciousness: A social constructionist account. Retrieved from http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/kgergen1/web/ page.phtml?id=manu3&st=manuscripts&hf=1 on September 2003. [Draft copy appearing as “Erzählung, moralische Identät und historisches Bewusstsein. Eine sozialkonstruktionistische Darstellung.” In J. Straub (ed.) (1998), Identität und historisches Bewusstsein. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • GU = Guardian unlimited Archive (2001). Foot and mouth disease. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/footand mouth/ on 15 January 2003.

  • Gwyn, R. (2001). Communicating Health and Illness. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. (1998). The Killing of the Countryside. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, N. and G. Ferguson (2000). Who is misunderstanding whom? Bridging the gulf of understanding between the public, the media and science. Economic and Social Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ whom/whofirst.html on 15 January 2003.

  • Husserl, E. (1913). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book, trans. F. Kersten.] The Hague: Nijhoff, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, David (2001). The use of vaccination in the current FMD outbreak. Retrieved from http://www.defra.gov.uk/footand mouth/vaccination/kingarticle.htm on 15 January 2003.

  • Labov, W. (1981). “Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative.” In D. Tanner, (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk (pp. 219-247). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, Illinois: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George (1992). The metaphor system used to justify war in the gulf. Retrieved from http://www.philosophy.uoregon.edu/metaphor/lakoff-l.htm on 15 January 2003.

  • MacLachlan, G. and I. Reid (1994). Framing and Interpretation. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mepham, Ben (2001). “Foot and mouth disease and British agriculture: Ethics in a crisis.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14: 339-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morpurgo, M. (2001). Out of the Ashes. London: Macmillan Children's Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. (2001). “Molecular metaphors: The gene in popular discourse.” Nature Reviews/Genetics 2 (July 2002): 555-559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlich, B., D. D. Clarke, and R. Dingwall (1999). “The influence of popular cultural imagery on public attitudes towards cloning.” Sociological Research Online 4(3). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/4/3/Nerlich.html on 15 January 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlich, B., C. Hamilton, and V. Rowe (2002). “Conceptualising foot and mouth disease: The socio-cultural role of metaphors, frames and narratives,” in metaphorik.de. Retrieved from http://www.metaphorik.de/02/nerlich.htm on 15 January 2003.

  • Nerlich, B. (2003). “Tracking the fate of the metaphor silent spring in British environmental discourse: Towards an evolutionary ecology of metaphor.” Special issue of metaphorik.de on Metaphor and Ecology, edited by Martin Döring und Wilhelm Trampe (http://www.metaphorik.de/04/nerlich.htm).

  • North, R. (2001). The Death of British Agriculture. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, A. (2001). The End of British Farming. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., K. Bickerstaff, I. Langford, J. Niewöhner, and N. Pidgeon (2003). “The British 2001 foot and mouth Crisis: A comparative study of public risk perceptions, trust and beliefs about government policy in two communities.” Journal of Risk Research 6: 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the Folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, C. E. and J. Golden (eds.) (1992). Framing Disease: Studies in Cultural History. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, C. E. (1992). Explaining Epidemics and Other Studies in the History of Medicine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society Report (2002). Infectious Diseases in Livestock The Royal Society Inquiry into Infectious Diseases in Livestock, chaired by Sir Brian Follett FRS. Retrieved from http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/inquiry/index.html on 15 January 2003.

  • Schön, D. (1979). “Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy.” In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 254-283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. and M. Rein (1994). Frame Reflection. Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. 1962. Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. Edited by Maurice Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. (2001). “Sporting cancer: Struggle language in news reports of people with cancer.” Sociology of Health and Illness 23(3): 308-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (1991). “Codes and conflict; toward a theory of war as ritual.” Theory and Society 20(1): 103-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1979). Illness as Metaphor. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1989). Aids and Its Metaphors. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M. (2003). “Responding to the crisis: The policy impact of the foot and mouth epidemic.” Political Quarterly 74(1): 47-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, A. (2001). “Foot-and-mouth disease.” In M. Sissons (ed.), The Future of Rural Britain (pp. 99-124). London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, A. (2002). Foot and Mouth Disease in 20th Century Britain: Science, Policy and the Veterinary Profession. Thesis, University of Manchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brigitte Nerlich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nerlich, B. War on foot and mouth disease in the UK, 2001: Towards a cultural understanding of agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 21, 15–25 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHUM.0000014022.42425.a9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHUM.0000014022.42425.a9

Navigation