Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Establishment of Carex stricta Lam. seedlings in experimental wetlands with implications for restoration

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The loss of Carex dominated meadows due to agricultural drainage in the previously glaciated midcontinent of North America has been extensive. The lack of natural Carex recruitment in wetland restorations and the failures of revegetation attempts underscore the need for information on the establishment requirements of wetland sedges. In this study, seedlings of Carex stricta Lam. were planted in three experimental wetlands in east-central Minnesota, USA to investigate the biotic and abiotic environmental limitations to establishment. Seedlings were planted along an elevational water depth gradient to assess the effects of water depth and water level fluctuation on seedling survival and growth. A different water level fluctuation regime was assigned to each of the experimental wetlands to assess seedling tolerance for seasonal water level changes. The effects of seedling planting density and the presence or absence of non-sedge colonizers on seedling survival and growth were also studied. The experiment was followed for three growing seasons. The results of this study indicate that C. stricta seedlings were sensitive to the timing and duration of inundation during the first growing season. Once established, plants tolerated a broad range of seasonal drying and flooding conditions. Seedling and juvenile growth was slowed by non-sedge colonizers during the first two growing seasons, but by the third growing season, C. stricta was able to out-grow all annual and perennial weeds, except the aggressive perennial, Phalaris arundinacea L. The rapid growth of C. stricta plants, once established, indicates that the use of seedlings is a successful method for (re) introducing this tussock sedge into wetland restorations under a variety of environmental conditions. Comparison with other studies performed under similar conditions suggests that planting of seedlings is a more appropriate method of establishing this species than the use of transplanted rhizomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexeev Y.E. 1988. Ontogenesis in Carex species. Aquatic Botany 29: 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker J.P., Poschlod P., Strykstra R.J., Bekker R.M. and Thompson K. 1989. Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45: 461–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskin C.C., Chester E.W. and Baskin J.M. 1996. Effect of flooding on annual dormancy cycles in buried seeds of two wetland Carex species. Wetlands 16: 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard J.M. 1990. Life history and vegetative reproduction in Carex. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 1441–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard J.M. and Gorham E. 1978. Life history aspects of primary production in sedge wetlands.. In: Good R.E., Whigham D.F. and Simpson R.L. _eds_, Freshwater wetlands: production processes and management potential. Academic Press, New York, USA, pp. 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelsky R.A. and Galatowitsch S.M. 1999. Effects of moisture, temperature, and time on seed germination of five wetland Carices: implications for restoration. Restoration Ecology 7: 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budelsky R.A. and Galatowitsch S.M. 2000. Effects of water regime and competition on the establishment of a native sedge in restored wetlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 971–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello D.F. 1936. Tussock meadows in southeastern Wisconsin. Botanical Gazette 97: 610–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford R.M.M. 1982. Physiological responses to flooding. In: Lange O.L., Nobel P.S., Osmond C.B. and Ziegler H. _eds_, Physiological Plant Ecology. II. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Vol 12B. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, pp. 453–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl T.E. and Johnson C.E. 1991. Wetland status and trends in the conterminous United States, mid-1970's to mid-1980's. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch S.M., Anderson N.O. and Ascher P.D. 1999b. Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19: 733–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch S.M., Budelsky R.A. and Yetka L.A. 1999a. Revegetation strategies for northern temperate glacial marshes and meadows. In: Streever W. (ed.), An international perspective on wetland rehabilitation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch S.M. and van der Valk A.G. 1994. Restoring prairie wetlands: an ecological approach. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch S.M. and van der Valk A.G. 1996a. Characteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16: 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch S.M. and van der Valk A.G. 1996b. The vegetation of restored prairie pothole wetlands. Ecological Applications 6: 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garwood A.N. 1996. Weather America: the latest detailed climatological data for over 4,000 places – with rankings. Toucan Valley Publications Inc., Milpitas, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason H.A. and Cronquist A. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, 2nd ed. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green E.M. and Galatowitsch S.M. 2001. Differences in wetland plant community establishment with additions of nitrate-N and invasive species _Phalaris arundinacea and Typha x glauca_. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green E.M. and Galatowitsch S.M. 2002. Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on wetland plant community establishment. Journal of Applied Ecology. 39(1): 134–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harper J.L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris S.W. and Marshall W.H. 1963. Ecology of water level manipulation on a northern marsh. Ecology 44: 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isselstein J., Tallowin J.R.B. and Smith R.E.N. 2002. Factors affecting seed germination and seedling establishment of fen-meadow species. Restoration Ecology 10 (2): 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone I.M. 1986. Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biological Review 61: 369–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy P.A. and Ellis T.H. 1985. Seedling recruitment of eleven wetland plant species along a water level gradient: shared or distinct responses? Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 1867–1879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman L.K. and Sharitz R.R. 1993. Growth in controlled water regimes of three grasses common in freshwater wetlands of the southeastern USA. Aquatic Botany 44: 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt C. and Rosenthal G. 1995. Seedbank potential and seed dispersal in inundated damp meadows. Kieler notes to the Botany in Schleswig-Holstein and Hamburg 23: 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman C.L. 2000. The competition-colonization equations: ecological and evolutionary implications. PhD. Dissertation. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee K.L., Mendelssohn I.A. and Burdick D.M. 1989. Effect of long-term flooding on root metabolic response in five freshwater marsh plant species. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 3446–3452.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks R.L. 1969. The effect of drawdown date on wetland plant succession. Journal of Wildlife Management 33: 817–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar J.B. 1973. Vegetation changes in shallow marsh wetlands under improving moisture regime. Canadian Journal of Botany 51: 1443–1457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D.C. 1991. Design and analysis of experiments, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D. and Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhouse J. and Galatowitsch S. 2003. Revegetation of prairie pothole wetlands in the mid-continental US: twelve years post-flooding. Plant Ecology 169(1): 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry L.G. 2001. Controlling Phalaris arundinacea invasion in re-stored sedge meadow wetlands. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfadenhauer J. and Grootjans A. 1999. Wetland restoration in Central Europe: aims and methods. Applied Vegetation Science 2: 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfadenhauer J. and Mass D. 1987. Samenpotential in Niedermoor-böden des Alpenvorlandes bei Grünlandnutzung unterschiedli-cher Intensität. Flora 179: 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips M.M. 1993. Wetland plant communities and factors influencing plant distributions at the Cedar Creek Natural History Area, Minnesota. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince H. 1997. Wetlands of the American midwest: a historical geography of changing attitudes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs J.G.M., Bobbink R., Brouwer E. and de Graaf M.C.C. 1996. Restoration ecology of aquatic and terrestrial vegetation on non-calcareous soils in The Netherlands. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45: 517–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth S., Seeger T., Poschlod P., Pfadenhauer J. and Succow M. 1999. Establishment of helophytes in the course of fen restoration. Applied Vegetation Science 2: 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1996. SAS System for Microsoft Windows, Release 6. 12. Cary, North Carolina, USA.

  • Shipley B., Keddy P.A. and Lefkovitch L.P. 1991. Mechanisms producing plant zonation along a water depth gradient: a comparison with the exposure gradient. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 1420–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B., Keddy P.A., Moore R.J. and Lemky K. 1989. Regeneration and establishment strategies of emergent macrophytes. Journal of Ecology 77: 1093–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg K. and Danell K. 1983. Effects of permanent flooding on Carex-Equisetum wetlands in northern Sweden. Aquatic Botany 15: 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence D.H.N. 1982. The zonation of plants in freshwater lakes.. In: Macfadyen A. and Ford E.D. _eds_, Advances in ecological research. Academic Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires L. and van der Valk A. G. 1992. Water-depth tolerances of the dominant emergent macrophytes of the Delta Marsh, Mani-toba. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 1860–1867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D., May R.M., Lehman C.L. and Nowak M.A. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk A.G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62: 688–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk A.G. 1982. Succession in temperate North American wetlands.. In: Gopal B., Turner R.E., Wetzel R.G. and Whigham D.F. _eds_, Wetlands: ecology and management. Jaipur: International Scientific Publications, India, pp. 169-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk A.G. 2000. Vegetation dynamics and models. In: Murkin H.R., van der Valk A.G. and Clark W.R. _eds_, Prairie wetland ecology: the contribution of the Marsh Ecology Research Program. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, pp. 125-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk A.G., Bremolm T.L. and Gordon. E. 1999. The restoration of sedge meadows: seed viablity, seed germination requirements and seedling growth of Carex species. Wetlands 19: 756–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk A.G., Pederson R.L. and Davis C.B. 1992. Restoration and creation of freshwater wetlands using seedbanks. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1: 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk A.G. and Verhoven J.T.A. 1988. Potential role of seedbanks and understory species in restoring quaking fens from floating forests. Vegetatio 76: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk A.G. and Welling C.H. 1988. The development of zonation in freshwater wetlands: an experimental approach. In: During H.J., Werger M.J.A. and Willems J.H. _eds_, Diversity and pattern in plant communities. SPB Academic Publishing. The Hague, Netherlands, pp. 145-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welling C.H., Pederson R.L. and van der Valk A.G. 1988. Recruitment from the seed bank and the development of zonation of emergent vegetation during a drawdown in a prairie wetland. Journal of Ecology 76: 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner K.J. and Zedler J.B. 2002. How sedge meadow soils, microtopography, and vegetation respond to sedimentation. Wetlands 22(3): 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler G. A. 1981. A study of the genus Carex in Minnesota. Vol. 2. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wienhold C.E. and van der Valk A.G. 1989. The impact of duration of drainage on the seedbanks of northern prairie wetlands. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 1878–1884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox D.A., Apfelbaum S.I. and Hiebert R.D. 1985. Cattail invasion of sedge meadows following hydrologic disturbance in the Cowles Bog wetland complex, Indiana Dunes National Lake-shore. Wetlands 4: 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S.D. and Keddy P.A. 1986. Plant zonation on a shoreline gradient: physiological response curves of component species. Journal of Ecology 73: 851–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetka L.A. and Galatowitsch S.M. 1998. Factors affecting revegetation of Carex lacustris Willd. and Carex stricta Lam. from rhizomes. Restoration Ecology 7: 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Conservation Biology Program, University of Minnesota, 305 Alderman Hall, St. Paul, MN, 55108

    Rachel A. Budelsky & Susan M. Galatowitsch

  2. 2091 Lakemoor Drive SW, Olympia, WA, 98512, USA

    Rachel A. Budelsky

Authors
  1. Rachel A. Budelsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan M. Galatowitsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Budelsky, R.A., Galatowitsch, S.M. Establishment of Carex stricta Lam. seedlings in experimental wetlands with implications for restoration. Plant Ecology 175, 91–105 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000048102.72101.50

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000048102.72101.50

Search

Navigation