Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic Decentralization and Channel Coordination

  • Published:
Quantitative Marketing and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we show that under certain conditions, strategic decentralization through the addition of a retailer in the distribution channel can increase a manufacturer's profits. The specific case on which we focus is the quantity coordination (double marginalization) problem for a manufacturer selling durable goods in a two-period setting. We show that the standard solution that coordinates a channel for non-durables does not coordinate the channel for durables. In particular, even though a manufacturer can achieve channel coordination by offering per-period, two-part fees, the equilibrium wholesale price in the first period is strictly above the manufacturer's marginal cost. This is in stark contrast to the two-part solution for non-durables where the equilibrium wholesale price is equal to marginal cost. We also identify a strategy that solves both the channel coordination and the Coase problem associated with durable goods. In this strategy, at the beginning of period 1, the manufacturer writes a contract with the retailer specifying a fixed fee and wholesale prices covering both periods. We show that by adding a retailer and using this contract, the manufacturer makes higher profits than it could if it were to sell directly to consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ausubel, L. and R. Deneckere. (1989). “Reputation in Bargaining and Durable Goods Monopoly”, Econometrica 57, 511-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, M., S. Salant, and J. Swierzbinski. (1989). “Durable-Goods Monopoly with Discrete Demand”, Journal of Political Economy 97(12), 1459-1478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1982). “Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets”, Journal of Law and Economics 25(1), 27-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E. and L. Samuelson. (1984). “Durable Good Monopolies with Rational Expectations and Replacement Sales”, RAND Journal of Economics 15(3), 336-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J. (1982). “Durable-Goods Monopolist”, Journal of Political Economy 90(2), 314-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J. (1986). “An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(4), 729-779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butz, D. (1990). “Durable-Good Monopoly and Best Price Provisions”, American Economic Review 80, 729-749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1972). “Durability and Monopoly”, Journal of Law and Economics 15(April), 143-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlisk, J., E. Gerstner, and J. Sobel. (1984). “Cyclic Pricing by a Durable Goods Monopolist”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, 489-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, P. and D. Purohit. (1998). “Leasing and Selling: Optimal Strategies for a Durable Goods Firm”, Management Science 44(11), S19-S34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, P. and D. Purohit. (1999). “Competition in Durable Goods Markets: The Strategic Consequences of Leasing and Selling”, Marketing Science 18(1), 42-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, N. and K. Kuhn. (1995). “Coase Versus Pacman: Who Eats Whom in the Durable Goods Monopoly”, Journal of Political Economy 103(4), 785-812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole. (1998). “Upgrades, Trade-Ins, and Buybacks”, RAND Journal of Economics 29, 235-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., Y. Yang, and K. Anderson. (2001). “A Theory of Finitely Durable Goods Monopoly with Used-Goods Market and Transaction Costs”, Management Science 47(11), 1515-1532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeuland, A.P. and S.M. Shugan. (1983). “Managing Channel Profits”, Marketing Science 2(3), 239-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, C. (1986). “The Durable Goods Monopolist and Consistency with Increasing Costs”, Econometrica 54(2), 275-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (1990). “Improving Channel Coordination Through Franchising”, Marketing Science 9(4), 299-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R., J.D.C. Little, and Miguel Villas-Boas. (1996). “A Theory of Forward Buying, Merchandising and Trade Deals”, Marketing Science 15(1), 21-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, K. (1987). “Managing Channel Profits: Comment”, Marketing Science 6(4), 375-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, T. and R. Staelin. (1983). “An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration”, Marketing Science 2(2), 239-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. and S. Srinivasan. (1995). “Why Are Royalty Rates Higher in Service Type Franchises?”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4(1), 7-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, J. (1950). “Vertical Integration and Anti-Trust Policy”, Journal of Political Economy 58, 347-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokey, N. (1981). “Rational Expectations and Durable Goods Pricing”, Bell Journal of Economics 12(Spring), 112-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villas-Boas, M. (1998). “Product Line Design for a Distribution Channel”, Marketing Science 17(2), 156-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1994). “On the Function of Sales Assistance”, Marketing Science 13(1), 68-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Preyas Desai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desai, P., Koenigsberg, O. & Purohit, D. Strategic Decentralization and Channel Coordination. Quantitative Marketing and Economics 2, 5–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QMEC.0000017033.09155.12

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QMEC.0000017033.09155.12

Navigation