Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Environmental Behavior in Societies in Transition: Evidence from Five European Countries

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Countries of Central and East Europe are in a process of economic, social and political transition. This process provides a unique opportunity for cross-national studies in a context of social transformation and radical infrastructural changes. In the present study, we compared environmental behavior, and the factors affecting it, of citizens from five European countries with diverse economic and social status. Outcomes of the present survey suggest that people's attitudes towards environmental issues and economy-environment trade-offs can be considered reliable predictors, contrary to political attitudes which did not prove to be important determinants of environmental behavior. However, one should be aware of the differences in individual factors affecting citizens' environmental behavior, since the latter cannot be considered as a linear function of a country's development and modernization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Burningham, K., & O'Brien, M. (1994). Global environmental values and local contexts of action. Sociology, 28, 913–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Environmental behavior: Discrepancies between aspirations and reality. Rationality and Society, 10, 79–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E. (1989). Public opinion and environmental policy. In J. P. Lester (Ed.), Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence, (pp. 87–134.) Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, A., Eisler, H., & Yoshiba, M. (2003). Perception of human ecology: Cross-cultural and gender comparisons. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (1998). Transition Report 1997. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environmental Agency. (1998). Europe's Environment: The Second Assessment. Office for official publications of the European Union. Luxemburg/ Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., & Need, A. (2002). Explaining ethnic polarization over attitudes towards minority rights in Eastern Europe: A multilevel analysis. Social Science Research, 31, 653–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, U., & Prskawetz, A. (2002). Can regional variations in demographic structure explain regional differences in car use? a case study in Austria. Population and Environment, 23, 315–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatayev, V. S. (2000). Regional aspects of the development of a market economy and democratization in Belarus. European Urban and Regional Studies, 7, 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransson, N., & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, mea-surement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamba, R. J., & Oskamp, S. (1994). Factors influencing community residents' participation in Commingled curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behavior, 26, 587–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooch, G. F. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States. Environment & Behavior, 27, 513–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guagnano, G. A. (2001). Altruism and Market-like behavior: An analysis of willingness to pay for recycled paper products. Population and Environment, 22, 425–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guagnano, G. A., & Markee, N. (1995). Regional differences in the sociodemographic deter-minants of environmental concern. Population and Environment, 17, 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, D., Crete, J., & Mercier, J. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the determinants of recycling behavior in the European countries. Social Science Research, 30, 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, S. P., & Innes, J. M. (2000). The prediction of ecological and environmental belief systems: The differential contributions of social conservatism and beliefs about money. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudler, M., & Richter, R. (2002). Cross-national comparison of the quality of life in Europe: Inventory of surveys and methods. Social Indicators Research, 58, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Biel, A. (2000). Assessing general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural com-parison between Switzerland and Sweden. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., Doka, G., Hofstetter, P., & Ranney, M. (2003). Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Shimoda, T. A. (1999). Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2000). Assessing people's general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 952–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, R. (2001). Data Construction and Data Analysis for Survey Research. New York: Palgrave Global Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klineberg, S. L. (1998). Environmental attitudes among Anglos, Blacks and Hispanics in Texas: Has the concern gap disappeared? Race, Gender and Class, 6, 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klineberg, S. L., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of envi-ronmental concern: It does make a difference how it's measured. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 734–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. (1995). Behavioral Research Methods. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matutinovic, I. (1998). Quality of life in transition countries: Central East Europe with special reference to Croatia. Social Indicators Research, 43, 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meseke, C. (1994). Understanding the environment: A comparison of workers in Germany and Poland. Psychology, A Journal of Human Behavior, 31, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohai, P. (1997). Gender differences in the perception of most important environmental problems. Race, Gender and Class, 5, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J. (2000). The environmental movement in an era of ecological modernization. Geoforum, 31, 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G., & Tsiapa, M. (2001). The spatial aspect of enterprise learning in transition countries. Regional Studies, 35, 549–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, K. K., & Crenshaw, E. M. (2002). Post-industrial transformations and cyber-space: A cross-national analysis of internet development. Social Science Research, 31, 334–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schan, J., & Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern. The role of knowledge, gender, and background variables. Environment and Behavior, 22, 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concerns for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as Predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokol, M. (2001). Central and Eastern Europe a decade after the fall of state-socialism: Regional dimensions of transition processes. Regional Studies, 35, 645–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics, New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C. (1999). Constraints on environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodori, G. L., & Luloff, A. E. (2002). Position on environmental issues and engagement in proenvironmental behaviors. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topalova V. (1997). Individualism/collectivism and social identity. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell, D. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C. (2000). Essential Psychology for environmental policy making. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widergren, Ö. (1998). The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior, 30, 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny, L. C., Poh-pheng C., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 443–457.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korfiatis, K.J., Hovardas, T. & Pantis, J.D. Determinants of Environmental Behavior in Societies in Transition: Evidence from Five European Countries. Population and Environment 25, 563–584 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000039065.31109.1e

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000039065.31109.1e

Navigation