Abstract
Countries of Central and East Europe are in a process of economic, social and political transition. This process provides a unique opportunity for cross-national studies in a context of social transformation and radical infrastructural changes. In the present study, we compared environmental behavior, and the factors affecting it, of citizens from five European countries with diverse economic and social status. Outcomes of the present survey suggest that people's attitudes towards environmental issues and economy-environment trade-offs can be considered reliable predictors, contrary to political attitudes which did not prove to be important determinants of environmental behavior. However, one should be aware of the differences in individual factors affecting citizens' environmental behavior, since the latter cannot be considered as a linear function of a country's development and modernization.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Burningham, K., & O'Brien, M. (1994). Global environmental values and local contexts of action. Sociology, 28, 913–932.
Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Environmental behavior: Discrepancies between aspirations and reality. Rationality and Society, 10, 79–102.
Dunlap, R. E. (1989). Public opinion and environmental policy. In J. P. Lester (Ed.), Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence, (pp. 87–134.) Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Eisler, A., Eisler, H., & Yoshiba, M. (2003). Perception of human ecology: Cross-cultural and gender comparisons. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 89–101.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (1998). Transition Report 1997. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
European Environmental Agency. (1998). Europe's Environment: The Second Assessment. Office for official publications of the European Union. Luxemburg/ Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Evans, G., & Need, A. (2002). Explaining ethnic polarization over attitudes towards minority rights in Eastern Europe: A multilevel analysis. Social Science Research, 31, 653–680.
Ewert, U., & Prskawetz, A. (2002). Can regional variations in demographic structure explain regional differences in car use? a case study in Austria. Population and Environment, 23, 315–345.
Fatayev, V. S. (2000). Regional aspects of the development of a market economy and democratization in Belarus. European Urban and Regional Studies, 7, 68–84.
Fransson, N., & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, mea-surement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369–382.
Gamba, R. J., & Oskamp, S. (1994). Factors influencing community residents' participation in Commingled curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behavior, 26, 587–612.
Gooch, G. F. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States. Environment & Behavior, 27, 513–539.
Guagnano, G. A. (2001). Altruism and Market-like behavior: An analysis of willingness to pay for recycled paper products. Population and Environment, 22, 425–438.
Guagnano, G. A., & Markee, N. (1995). Regional differences in the sociodemographic deter-minants of environmental concern. Population and Environment, 17, 135–149.
Guerin, D., Crete, J., & Mercier, J. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the determinants of recycling behavior in the European countries. Social Science Research, 30, 195–218.
Hambleton R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153–171.
Hodgkinson, S. P., & Innes, J. M. (2000). The prediction of ecological and environmental belief systems: The differential contributions of social conservatism and beliefs about money. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 285–294.
Hudler, M., & Richter, R. (2002). Cross-national comparison of the quality of life in Europe: Inventory of surveys and methods. Social Indicators Research, 58, 217–228.
Kaiser, F. G., & Biel, A. (2000). Assessing general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural com-parison between Switzerland and Sweden. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 44–52.
Kaiser, F. G., Doka, G., Hofstetter, P., & Ranney, M. (2003). Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 11–20.
Kaiser, F. G., & Shimoda, T. A. (1999). Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 243–253.
Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2000). Assessing people's general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 952–978.
Kent, R. (2001). Data Construction and Data Analysis for Survey Research. New York: Palgrave Global Publishing.
Klineberg, S. L. (1998). Environmental attitudes among Anglos, Blacks and Hispanics in Texas: Has the concern gap disappeared? Race, Gender and Class, 6, 70–82.
Klineberg, S. L., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of envi-ronmental concern: It does make a difference how it's measured. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 734–753.
Leary, M. R. (1995). Behavioral Research Methods. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Matutinovic, I. (1998). Quality of life in transition countries: Central East Europe with special reference to Croatia. Social Indicators Research, 43, 97–119.
Meseke, C. (1994). Understanding the environment: A comparison of workers in Germany and Poland. Psychology, A Journal of Human Behavior, 31, 1–8.
Mohai, P. (1997). Gender differences in the perception of most important environmental problems. Race, Gender and Class, 5, 153–169.
Mol, A. P. J. (2000). The environmental movement in an era of ecological modernization. Geoforum, 31, 45–56.
Petrakos, G., & Tsiapa, M. (2001). The spatial aspect of enterprise learning in transition countries. Regional Studies, 35, 549–562.
Robison, K. K., & Crenshaw, E. M. (2002). Post-industrial transformations and cyber-space: A cross-national analysis of internet development. Social Science Research, 31, 334–363.
Schan, J., & Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern. The role of knowledge, gender, and background variables. Environment and Behavior, 22, 239–260.
Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concerns for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.
Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as Predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265.
Sokol, M. (2001). Central and Eastern Europe a decade after the fall of state-socialism: Regional dimensions of transition processes. Regional Studies, 35, 645–655.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics, New York: Harper.
Tanner, C. (1999). Constraints on environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 145–157.
Theodori, G. L., & Luloff, A. E. (2002). Position on environmental issues and engagement in proenvironmental behaviors. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 471–482.
Topalova V. (1997). Individualism/collectivism and social identity. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 53–64.
Uzzell, D. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 307–318.
Vlek, C. (2000). Essential Psychology for environmental policy making. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 153–167.
Widergren, Ö. (1998). The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior, 30, 75–100.
Zelezny, L. C., Poh-pheng C., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 443–457.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korfiatis, K.J., Hovardas, T. & Pantis, J.D. Determinants of Environmental Behavior in Societies in Transition: Evidence from Five European Countries. Population and Environment 25, 563–584 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000039065.31109.1e
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000039065.31109.1e