Skip to main content
Log in

Strong holism, weak holism, and health

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The health theories of Nordenfelt and Boorse are compared. Critical attention is focused on Nordenfelt's description of his theory as one of holistic welfare, contrasting with Boorse's analytical and statistical approach. Neither theory is found to give an entirely satisfactory account of ‘health’ in scientific medicine or common usage. Because Nordenfelt attenuates the ontological significance of organs and organ parts and simplifies the role of statistics, his theory is regarded as weakly holistic. Boorse underrates the importance of non-statistical evaluation. A mediating position, termed ‘strong holism’ is suggested as a way of integrating normative and statistical elements in a more adequate health concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boorse, C.: 1977, ‘Health as a Theoretical Concept’, Philosophy of Science 44, 542–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L.: 1987, On the Nature of Health. An Action-Theoretic Approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L.: 1993, Quality of Life, Health and Happiness. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L.: 1997a, ‘Holism Reconsidered: A Reply to Taljedahl (sic!)’, Scand. J. Soc. Med. 25, 243–245.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L.: 1997b, ‘Comment to Täljedal. On Holism and Conceptual Structures’, Scand. J. Soc. Med. 25, 247–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L: 2001, Health, Science, and Ordinary Language. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Täljedal, I.-B.: 1997a, ‘Weak and Strong Holism’, Scand. J. Soc. Med. 25, 67–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Täljedal, I.-B.: 1997b, ‘Comment to Nordenfelt. In all fairness’, Scand. J. Soc. Med. 25, 246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, S., C. Albano, W.J. Dunn, U. Edlund, K. Esbensen, P. Geladi, S. Hellberg, E. Johansson, W. Lindberg and M. Sjöström: 1984, ‘Multivariate Data Analysis in Chemistry. Part 1: Principal Components and Factor Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling. Part 2: Pattern Recognition. Part 3: Multiple Regression (MR) and Partial Least Squares Modelling with Latent Variables (PLS)’, in: B.R. Kowalski (ed.), Chemometrics. Mathematics and Statistics in Chemistry. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 17–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Täljedal, IB. Strong holism, weak holism, and health. Med Health Care Philos 7, 143–148 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHEP.0000034320.45018.d8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHEP.0000034320.45018.d8

Navigation