Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Female Postcopulatory Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila biarmipes

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The postcopulatory behavior of Drosophila biarmipes and Drosophila melanogaster females was analyzed and compared. Females from both species were shown to undergo a series of behavioral changes following mating, including significant reductions in both sexual attractiveness and receptivity. However, while both attractiveness and receptivity returned to “virgin-like” levels within a few days in D. melanogaster, D. biarmipes females, which regained their sexual attractiveness within a few days, remained unreceptive to copulation for at least 2 weeks. With respect to fecundity, D. melanogaster females produced more offspring when given opportunities to remate, while D. biarmipes females did not benefit from remating opportunities. These observations suggest that D. biarmipes females may have the ability to store sperm and produce offspring from a single mating over longer periods of time than other drosophilids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Antony, C., and Jallon, J.-M. (1982). The chemical basis for sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 28: 873–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, C., Davis, T. L., Carlson, D. A., Pechine, J.-M., and Jallon, J.-M. (1985). Compared behavioral responses of male Drosophila melanogaster (Canton-S) to natural and synthetic aphrodisiacs. J. Chem. Ecol. 11: 1617–1629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastock, M., and Manning, A. (1955). The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 8: 85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubis, J., DeGreen, H. P., Unsell, J. L., and Tompkins, L. (1998). Temporal manipulation of ejaculate components by newly fertilised Drosophila melanogaster females. Animal Behaviour in press.

  • Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F., and Partridge, L. (1995). Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. S. (1991). Biochemistry and molecular regulation of the male accessory gland secretions in Drosophila (Diptera). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 27: 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, K. G. (1958). The migration of spermatozoa in the female of Rhodnius prolixus Stal. J. Exp. Biol. 35: 694–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, K. G., and Webster, G. F. (1967). The structure and secretion of the spermatheca of Rhodnius prolixus Stal: A histological study. Can. J. Zool. 45: 653–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. S. (1956). Chromatographic differences between males and females in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of X and Y chromosomes. Physiol. Zool. 29: 28–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. C., Adams, C., and McRobert, S. P. (1995). Sucrose density separation of Drosophila larvae from instant media. Dros. Info. Serv. 76: 172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gromko, M. H., and Pyle, D. W. (1978). Sperm competition, male fitness and repeated mating by female Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 32: 588–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gromko, M. H., Newport, M. E. A., and Kortier, M. G. (1984). Sperm dependence of female receptivity to remating in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38: 1273–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubli, E. (1992). The sex-peptide. BioEssays 14: 779–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D., and Grell, E. (1968). Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst. Publ. 627.

  • Malloch, J. R. (1924). Two Drosophilidae from Coimbatore. Mem. Dept. Agr. India Entomol. Ser. 8: 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mane, S. D., Tompkins, L., and Richmond, R. C. (1983). Male esterase 6 catalyzes the synthesis of a sex pheromone in Drosophila melanogaster females. Science 222: 419–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. (1967). The control of female receptivity in female Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 15: 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobert, S. P., and Jackson, L. L. (1988). Description of sexual behaviors of Drosophila rajasekari. J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 1423–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (1986). Sexual mimicry regulates the attractiveness of mated Drosophila melanogaster females. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 8429–8433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreerama Reddy, G., and Krishna Murty, N. B. (1968). Drosophila rajasekari, a new species from Mysore (India). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 68B: 202–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L. (1984). Genetic analysis of sex appeal in Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 14: 411–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., and Hall, J. C. (1981). The different effects on courtship of volatile compounds from mated and virgin Drosophila females. J. Insect Physiol. 27: 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., Hall, J. C., and Hall, L. (1980). Courtship-stimulating volatile compounds from normal and mutant Drosophila. J. Insect Physiol. 26: 689–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M. R. (1981). The Drosophilidae: A taxonomic overview. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3a, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott P. McRobert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McRobert, S.P., Adams, C.R., Wuttke, M. et al. A Comparison of Female Postcopulatory Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila biarmipes . Journal of Insect Behavior 10, 761–770 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000010411.79386.22

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000010411.79386.22

Navigation