Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational Learning Is Essential to Achieving and Sustaining Change in Higher Education

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizational change is often temporary or unsuccessful. This literature review of organizational change in higher education explores research in higher education, sociology, and organizational studies focusing on the problem of sustaining successful change. Indicators of successful change are distilled from the recent research. Establishing conditions for continued organizational learning in a college or university is identified as an essential aspect of sustaining successful organizational change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. (1983). Reasoning, learning and action: Individual and organizational. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning (2nd ed.). Malden, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C.,& Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M.,& Neumann, A. (1993). Redesigning collegiate leadership: Teams and teamwork in higher education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W. H. (1992). The four cultures of the academy: Insights and strategies for improving leadership in collegiate organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W. H. (1993). The postmodern organization: Mastering the art of irreversible change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S.,& Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W. W. (2002). Organizational change: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. (1983). Strategic responses to conditions of decline: Higher education and the private sector. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 359-380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.,& Smart, J. (1998). Maintaining effectiveness amid downsizing and decline in institutions of higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39, 65-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.,& Tschirhart, M. (1992). Postindustrial environments and organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education, 63, 87-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerych, L. (1984). Implementation of higher education policies in Europe: Some general findings and a few lessons from Sweden. In R. Premfors (ed.), Higher education organization-Condition for policy implementation. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist&Wicksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1970). The distinctive college: Antioch, Reed, and Swarthmore. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983a). The contradictions of change in academic systems. Higher Education, 12, 101-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983b). The higher education system: Academic organization in crossnational perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1984). The organizational conception. In B. R. Clark (ed.), Perspectives on higher education (pp. 106-131). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic life. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1996). Substantive growth and innovative organization: New categories for higher education research. Higher Education, 32, 417-430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Paris, France: International Association of Universities (IAU) Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (2000). Collegial entrepreneurialism in proactive universities. Change, 32, 10-12+.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D.,& March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. Berkeley, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H.W.,& White, R.E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 522-537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, B. K. (1992). Instituting enduring innovations: Achieving continuity of change in higher education. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, J., Lamothe, L.,& Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 809-837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. (1994). The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively. London, England: McGraw-Hill International (UK) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duderstadt, J. J. (2000). A university for the 21st century. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, P., Green, M., Hill, B.,& Mallon, W. (1999). On change III. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., Rooke, D.,& Torbert, W. R. (2001). Personal and organizational transformations: Through action inquiry. Boston, MA: EdgenWork Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garratt, B. (1987). The learning organization: And the need for directors who think. London, England: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A.,& Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. S. (1982). Change in organizations: New perspectives on theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R.,& Hinings, C. R. (2000). Understanding radical organizational change. In M. C. Brown II (ed.), ASHE Reader on organization and governance (pp. 314-345). New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieves, J. (2000). Navigating change into the new millennium: Themes and issues for the learning organization. The Learning Organization, 7, 54+.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. C. (1996). Transforming U.S. higher education: An organizational perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 21, 141-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, A. S.,& Huff, J. O. (2000). When firms change direction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenniskens, I. (2000). Governmental steering and innovations in university curricula. In R. Kalleberg& F. Engelstad& G. Brochmann& A. Leira& L. Mjøset (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on universities (Vol. 19, pp. 139-164). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. J. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations (Vol. 28). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, F.,& Senge, P. M. (1993). Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 5-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. S.,& Zajac, E. J. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61, 812-836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (1980). Why innovation fails. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, B. B. (2000). Self-organized transitions: A pattern amid the chaos of transformation. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 128-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz, R.,& Popper, M. (2000). Organizational learning in a hospital. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 345-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G.,& Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J.& Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J.& Watkins, K. E. (1999). Facilitating learning organizations: Making learning count. Aldershot, England: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R. (1985). Developing capabilities for organizational learning. In J. M. Pennings&a. Associates (Eds.), Organizational strategy and change (pp. 217-248). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, R., Millemann, M.,& Gioja, L. (1997). Changing the way we change. Harvard Business Review, 75(6), 126-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1979). Complex organizations: A critical essay (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M.,& Lipshitz, R. (1998). Organizational learning mechanisms: A cultural and structural approach to organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34, 161-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M.,& Lipshitz, R. (2000). Organizational learning: Mechanisms, culture, and feasibility. Management Learning, 31, 181-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W.,& DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P.,& Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of action research. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. (1977). The ABC of action learning. Luton, England: Action Learning Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. W. (1982). The origins and growth of action learning. Chartwell-Bratt, England: Bromley&Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, D. J.,& Sherman, H. (2001). From strategy to change: Implementing the plan in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaafsma, H. (1997). A networking model of change for middle managers. Leadership&Organization Development Journal, 18, 41-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, D. R.,& Marquardt, M. J. (2000). Organizational learning: From world-class theories to global best practices. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznik, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G.,& Smith, B. (1999). The dance of change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organizations. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., Smith, B. J.,& Kleiner, A. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, D. T. (1988). Developing academic programs: The climate for innovation (ASHEERIC Higher Education Report no. 3). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, H. (1997). Metaphorical images of an organization: The power of symbolic constructs in reading changes in higher education organizations. Higher Education, 33, 283-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, H.,& Louis, K. S. (2000). Organizational change as paradigm shift. In M. C. Brown II (ed.), ASHE Reader on organization and governance (5th ed., pp. 550-565). New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. T. (1993). The new view of biological evolution: Organizational applications to higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 16, 141-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert, W. R. (1991). The power of balance: Transforming self, society, and scientific inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H.,& Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 510-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1982). Management of organizational change among loosely coupled elements. In P. S. Goodman&Associates (Eds.), Change in organizations (pp. 375-408). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyce, M.E. Organizational Learning Is Essential to Achieving and Sustaining Change in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education 28, 119–136 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000006287.69207.00

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000006287.69207.00

Navigation