Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Effects on Intima Media Thickness: An Evaluation of Rosuvastatin in Subclinical Atherosclerosis—The Rationale and Methodology of the METEOR Study

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Increased carotid intima media thickness (IMT) is associated with established coronary heart disease (CHD) and is a marker of atherosclerosis. Statins are an effective treatment for dyslipidaemia, and have been shown to retard progression or promote carotid IMT regression in patients at high risk of CHD. Rosuvastatin is a highly efficacious statin, and the Measuring Effects on intima media Thickness: an Evaluation Of Rosuvastatin (METEOR) study is designed to assess the impact of rosuvastatin on carotid IMT progression in low risk subjects with signs of subclinical atherosclerosis.

Methods: In this randomised, parallel-group study, asymptomatic subjects at low risk of cardiovascular disease, but with evidence of atherosclerosis (defined as carotid IMT ≥1.2 mm and <3.5 mm), will receive rosuvastatin (40 mg/day) or placebo for 104 weeks. The study will enrol 840 European and US subjects randomised 5:2 between rosuvastatin and placebo. The primary end point will be the change in carotid IMT from baseline to study end, measured using B-mode ultrasonography. Other efficacy end points include changes in the serum lipid profile and C-reactive protein. Safety parameters will also be assessed.

Conclusion: The METEOR study will evaluate whether long-term rosuvastatin treatment promotes regression, or slows progression, of subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic subjects at low risk of cardiovascular disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thaulow E, Erikssen J, Sandvik L, Erikssen G, Jorgensen L, Cohn PF. Initial clinical presentation of cardiac disease in asymptomatic men with silent myocardial ischemia and angiographically documented coronary artery disease (the Oslo Ischemia Study). Am J Cardiol 1993;72:629–633.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raggi P. The use of electron-beam computed tomography as a tool for primary prevention. Am J Cardiol 2001;88(Suppl J):28J–32J.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castelli WP, Anderson K, Wilson PW, Levy D. Lipids and risk of coronary heart disease. The Framingham Study. Ann Epidemiol 1992;2:23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Law MR, Wald NJ, Wu T, Hackshaw A, Bailey A. Systematic underestimation of association between serum cholesterol concentration and ischaemic heart disease in observational studies: Data from the BUPA study. BMJ 1994;308:363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knopp RH. Drug treatment of lipid disorders. New Engl J Med 1999;341:498–511.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994;344:1383–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1301–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al. The effects of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1001–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, et al. Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: Results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. JAMA 1998;279:1615–1622.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1349–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gotto AM Jr, Whitney E, Stein EA, et al. Relation between baseline and on-treatment lipid parameters and first acute major coronary events in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS). Circulation 2000;101:477–484.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heart Protection Study collaborative group. The MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;56:53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR, et al. ASCOT investigators. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:1149–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G, Pyörälä K. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: Recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on coronary prevention. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1434–1503.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486–2497.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crouse JR 3rd, Byington RP, Bond MG, et al. Pravastatin, Lipids, and Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Arteries (PLAC-II). Am J Cardiol 1995;75:455–459.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, et al. Reduction in carotid arterial wall thickness using lovastatin and dietary therapy. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:548–556.

    Google Scholar 

  18. MacMahon S, Sharpe N, Gamble G, et al. Effects of lowering average or below-average cholesterol levels on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis: Results of the LIPID Atherosclerosis Substudy. LIPID Trial Research Group. Circulation 1998;97:1784–1790.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Furberg CD, Adams HP Jr, Applegate WB, et al. Effect of lovastatin on early carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. Circulation 1994;90:1679–1687.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salonen R, Nyyssonen K, Porkkala E, et al. Kuopio Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (KAPS). A population-based primary preventive trial of the effect of LDL lowering on atherosclerotic progression in carotid and femoral arteries. Circulation 1995;92:1758–1764.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mercuri M, Bond MG, Sirtori CR, et al. Pravastatin reduces carotid intima-media thickness progression in an asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic mediterranean population: The Carotid Atherosclerosis Italian Ultrasound Study. Am J Med 1996;101:627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smilde TJ, van Wissen S, Wollersheim H, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ, Stalenhoef AF. Effect of aggressive versus conventional lipid lowering on atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolaemia (ASAP): A prospective, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2001;357:577–581.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor AJ, Kent SM, Flaherty PJ, Coyle LC, Markwood TT, Vernalis MN. ARBITER: Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol: A randomized trial comparing the effects of atorvastatin and pravastatin on carotid intima medial thickness. Circulation 2002;106:2055–2060.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Olsson AG, McTaggart F, Raza A. Rosuvastatin: A Highly Effective New HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor. Cardiovasc Drug Rev 2002;20:303–328.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ubels FL, Terpstra WF, Smit AJ. Carotid intima media thickness: Influence of drug treatment and clinical implications. Neth J Med 1999;55:188–195.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Espeland MA, Craven TE, Riley WA, Corson J, Romont A, Furberg CD. Reliability of longitudinal ultrasonographic measurements of carotid intimal-medial thicknesses. Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Progression Study Research Group. Stroke 1996;27:480–485.

    Google Scholar 

  27. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8, Cary, NC, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pitt B, Byington RP, Furberg CD, et al. Effect of amlodipine on the progression of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of clinical events. PREVENT Investigators. Circulation 2000;102:1503–1510.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lonn E, Yusuf S, Dzavik V, et al. Effects of ramipril and vitamin E on atherosclerosis: The study to evaluate carotid ultrasound changes in patients treated with ramipril and vitamin E (SECURE). Circulation 2001;103:919–925.

    Google Scholar 

  30. de Groot E, Jukema JW, van Swijndregt ADM, et al. B-mode ultrasound assessment of pravastatin treatment effect on carotid and femoral artery walls and its correlations with coronary arteriographic findings: A report of the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1561–1567.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Byington RP, Furberg CD, Crouse JR, Espeland MA, Bond MG. Pravastatin, Lipids and Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Arteries (PLAC-II). Am J Cardiol 1995;76:54C–59C.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gotto AM Jr, Farmer JA. Pleiotropic effects of statins: Do they matter? Curr Opin Lipidol 2001;12:391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liao JK. Beyond lipid lowering: The role of statins in vascular protection. Int J Cardiol 2002;86:5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, et al. for the STELLAR Study Group. Comparison of efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR Trial). Am J Cardiol 2003;92:152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Crouse JR 3rd, Craven TE, Hagaman AP, Bond MG. Association of coronary disease with segment-specific intimal-medial thickening of the extracranial carotid artery. Circulation 1995;92:1141–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bots ML, Witteman JC, Grobbee DE. Carotid intima-media wall thickness in elderly women with and without atherosclerosis of the abdominal aorta. Atherosclerosis 1993;102:99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mattace Raso F, Rosato M, Talerico A, Cotronei P, Mattace R. Intimal-medial thickness of the common carotid arteries and lower limbs atherosclerosis in the elderly. Minerva Cardioangiol 1999;47:321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Salonen JT, Salonen R. Ultrasound B-mode imaging in observational studies of atherosclerotic progression. Circulation 1993;87(Suppl II):II56–II65.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: The Rotterdam Study. Circulation 1997;96:1432–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, et al. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987–1993. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  41. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. N Engl J Med 1999;340:14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Iglesias del Sol A, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, Witteman JC. Carotid intima-media thickness at different sites: Relation to incident myocardial infarction. The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J 2002;23:934–940.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Belcaro G, Nicolaides AN, Laurora G, et al. Ultrasound morphology classification of the arterial wall and cardiovascular events in a 6-year follow-up study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16:851–856.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bots ML, Grobbee DE. Intima media thickness as a surrogate marker for generalised atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2002;16:341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Greenland P, Abrams J, Aurigemma GP, et al. Prevention Conference V: Beyond secondary prevention: Identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: Noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: Writing Group III. Circulation 2000;101:E16–E22.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, Oreste P, Paoletti R. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: A direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1986;74:1399–1406.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Grobbee DE, Bots ML. Statin treatment and progression of atherosclerotic plaque burden. Drugs 2003;63:893–911.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crouse III, J.R., Grobbee, D.E., O'Leary, D.H. et al. Measuring Effects on Intima Media Thickness: An Evaluation of Rosuvastatin in Subclinical Atherosclerosis—The Rationale and Methodology of the METEOR Study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 18, 231–238 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CARD.0000033645.55138.3d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CARD.0000033645.55138.3d

Navigation