Abstract
Studies of the transition from prehistory to history in Southeast Asia have traditionally relied primarily on documentary sources, which tend to emphasize foreign influences, rather than on the archaeological record, which suggests a series of indigenous developments. The papers in this journal issue and the next discuss strategies for using both documentary and archaeological evidence to study the transition to history and the emergence of early states in the region. These papers investigate how political units were structured and integrated in Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, and South China, and illustrate how historical and archaeological data can cross-check each other to inform on Southeast Asian sociopolitical and economic developments during the early historic period.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES CITED
Bayard, D. (1980). The roots of Indochinese civilization: Recent developments in the prehistory of Southeast Asia. Pacific Affairs 53(1): 89–114.
Bellwood, P. (1992). Southeast Asia before history. In Tarling, N. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 55–136.
Bellwood, P. (1997). Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago, rev. ed., University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu.
Bronson, B. (1977). Exchange at the upstream and downstream ends: Notes toward a functional model of the coastal state in Southeast Asia. In Hutterer, K. (ed.), Economic Exchange and Social Interaction in Southeast Asia: Perspectives from Prehistory, History, and Ethnography, Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asia No. 13, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 39–52.
Brown, D. E. (1988). Hierarchy, History, and Human Nature: The Social Origins of Historical Consciousness, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Christie, A. H. (1979). Lin-I, Fu-nan, Java. In Smith, R. B., and Watson, W. (eds.), Early South East Asia: Essays in Archaeology History, and Historical Geography, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 281–287.
Christie, J. W. (1995). State formation in early maritime Southeast Asia: A consideration of the theories and the data. Bijdragen Tot De Taal-, Land-en Volkenkunde 151(2): 235–288.
Coedès, G. (1968). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia, W. F. Vella (ed)., Cowing, S. B. (trans.), University Press of Hawai'i, Honolulu.
Comer, D. C. (1994). The SPAFA Unified Cultural Resource Management Guidelines for Southeast Asia. Vol. 1: Material Culture. Report on file, SPAFA, Bangkok.
Fagan, B. M. (1998). People of the Earth: An Introduction to World Prehistory, 9th ed., Longman, New York.
Feinman, G. (1997). Thoughts on new approaches to combining the archaeological and historical records. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4: 367–377.
Galloway, P. (1991). The archaeology of ethnohistorical narrative. In Thomas, D. H. (ed.), Columbian Consequences, Vol. 3: The Spanish Borderlands in Pan-American Perspective, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 453–469.
Glover, I. C. (1998). Archaeology and history in Vietnam—Some contemporary uses of the past. Paper presented at the 63rd annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Seattle, WA.
Hall, K. (1985). Maritime Trade and State Development in Early Southeast Asia, University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu.
Higham, C. F. W. (1989a). The Archaeology of Mainland Southeast Asia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Higham, C. F. W. (1989b). The later prehistory of mainland Southeast Asia. Journal of World Prehistory 3: 235–282.
Higham, C. F. W. (1996a). A review of archaeology in mainland Southeast Asia. Journal of Archaeological Research 4: 3–49.
Higham, C. F. W. (1996b). The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hutterer, K. L. (1982). Early southeast Asia: Old wine in new skins?—A review article. Journal of Asian Studies 41: 559–570.
Jacques, C. (1979). 'Funan,” Zhenla': The reality concealed by these Chinese views of Indochina. In Smith, R. B., and Watson, W. (eds.), Early South East Asia: Essays in Archaeology, History, and Historical Geography, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 371–379.
Jacques, C. (1995). China and ancient Khmer history. In South East Asia & China: Art, Interaction, and Commerce. In Schott, R., and Guy, J. (eds.), Colloquies on Art and Archaeology in Asia No. 17, Percival David Foundation of Chinese Art, University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies, London, pp. 32–40.
Kulke, H. (1990). Indian colonies, Indianization or cultural convergence? reflections on the changing image of India's role in South-East Asia. In Nordholt, H. S. (ed.), Onderzoek In Zuidoost-Azië, Vakgroep Talen en Culture van Zuidoost-Azië en Oceanië, Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden, pp. 8–32.
Lamb, A. (1961). Miscellaneous papers on early Hindu and Buddhist settlement in northern Malaya and southern Thailand. Federation Museums Journal New Series 6.
Miksic, J. (1990). Settlement patterns and sub-regions in Southeast Asia. Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs 24: 86–144.
Morrison, K. D., and Lycett, M. T. (1997). Inscriptions as artifacts: Precolonial south India and the analysis of texts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4: 215–237.
Nguyen, T. A. (1995). Historical research in Vietnam: A tentative survey. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 26: 121–132.
Reynolds, C. J. (1995). A new look at old Southeast Asia. Journal of Asian Studies 54: 419–446.
Smith, R. B., and W. Watson (eds.) (1979). Early Southeast Asia: Essays in Archaeology History, and Historical Geography, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Solheim, W. G., II, and Hackenberg, R. A. (1961). The importance of anthropological research to the Mekong Valley Project. France-Asie/Asia 169: 2459–2474.
Stahl, A. B. (1993). Concepts of time and approaches to analogical reasoning in historical perspective. American Antiquity 58: 235–260.
Tanudirjo, D. A. (1995). Theoretical trends in Indonesian archaeology. In Ucko, P. J. (ed.), Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective, Routledge, London, pp. 60–75.
Thongchai W. (1995). The changing landscape of the past: New histories in Thailand since 1973. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 26(1): 99–120.
Trigger, B. (1984). Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man (N.S.) 19: 355–370.
van Leur, J. C. (1967). Indonesian Trade and Society, W. van Hoeve, The Hague.
Wang Gungwu (1979). Introduction: The study of the Southeast Asian past. In Reid, A., and Marr, D. (eds.), Perceptions of the Past in Southeast Asia, Heinemann Educational Books (Asia), Kuala Lumpur, pp. 1–8.
Wang Gungwu (1986). Introduction. In Marr, D. G., and Milner, A. C. (eds.), Southeast Asia in the 9th to 14th Centuries, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, and Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Sydney, pp. xi-xvii.
Wheatley, P. (1961). The Golden Khersonese, University of Malaya Press, Kuala Lumpur.
Wheatley, P. (1979). Urban genesis in mainland Southeast Asia. In Smith, R. B., and Watson, W. (eds.), Early South East Asia: EssaYs in Archaeology, History, and Historical Geography, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 288–303.
Wheatley, P. (1982). Presidential address: India beyond the Ganges—Desultory reflections on the origins of civilization in Southeast Asia. Journal of Asian Studies 42: 13–28.
Wheatley, P. (1983). Nagara and Commandery: Origins of the Southeast Asian Urban Traditions, Research Papers Nos. 207–208. Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Wheatley, P., and Sandhu, K. S. (1983). Melaka: The Transformation of a Malay Capital, c. 1400–1980, Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur.
White, J. C. (1995). Incorporating heterarchy into theory on socio-political development: The case from Southeast Asia. In Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E. (eds.), Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association Number 6, Washington, DC, pp. 101–124.
Wolters, O. W. (1982). History, Culture, and Religion in Southeast Asian Perspectives, Institute for Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
Wood, W. R. (1989). Ethnohistory and historical method. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 2, University of Arizona Press, Tucson. pp. 81–109.
Wylie, A. (1985). The reaction against analogy. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 8, Academic Press, New York, pp. 63–111.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stark, M.T., Allen, S.J. The Transition to History in Southeast Asia: An Introduction. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 2, 163–174 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027316108205
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027316108205