Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating the population size with a behavioral response in capture-recapture experiment

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new estimating procedure is suggested to estimate the population size in a capture-recapture experiment. The capture intensities for first-capture and recapture are allowed to be different and time dependent but they are assumed to be proportional. It is shown that the information on the proportionality constant is crucial to the estimation of the population size. Sensitivity analysis with a misspecification of the proportionality constant is conducted. The method has also been extended to the case with an unknown proportionality. A real example is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, N.G. (1984) Estimating population size from capture-recapture experiments in continuous time. The Australian Journal of Statistics, 26, 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A. (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal capturability. Biometrics, 43, 783-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godambe, V.P. (1985) The foundations of finite sample estimation in stochastic processes. Biometrika, 72, 419-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godambe, V.P. and Heyde, C.C. (1987) Quasi-likelihood with optimal estimation. International Statistical Review, 55, 231-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D.Y. and Yip, P.S.F. (1999) Parametric rgression models for continuous time removal and recapture studies. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 61, 401-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C.J. and Chaiyapong, C. (1997) Improved inference for recapture experiments with behavioural response through modelling and auxiliary experimentation. The Australian Journal of Statistics, 38, 317-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C.J., Yip, P.S.F., and Chan, K.S. (1998) A comparison of recapturing, removal and weighting design for population size estimation. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 71, 363-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, T.K. (1988) Estimating population size by recapture sampling. Biometrika, 75, 113-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otis, D.L., Burnham, K.P., White, G.C., and Anderson, D.R. (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monograph, 62, 1-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pul, M.C. van (1992) Asymptotic properties of a class of statistical models in software reliability. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 19, 235-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G.A.F. (1982) The Estimation of Animal Abundance, 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang M.C.K. and Chao, A. (1995) Reliability estimation and stopping rules for software testing based on repeated appearance. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 44, 315-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, P. (1991) A martingale estimating equation for capture-recapture experiment in discrete time. Biometrics, 47, 1081-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, P., Fong, D.Y.T., and Wilson, K. (1993) Estimating population size by recapturing sampling via estimating function. Stochastic Models, 9, 179-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, P. (1995) Estimating the number of errors in a system — Using a Martingale Approach. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 44, 322-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, P.S.F. (1996) Effect of plant-capture in a capture-recapture experiment. Communications in Statistics, 25, 2025-38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yip, P.S., Xi, L., Chao, A. et al. Estimating the population size with a behavioral response in capture-recapture experiment. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 7, 405–414 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026575616678

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026575616678

Navigation