Skip to main content
Log in

Pre-BZ and Degenerate BZ Posets: Applications to Fuzzy Sets and Unsharp Quantum Theories

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two different generalizations of Brouwer–Zadeh posets (BZ posets) are introduced. The former (called pre-BZ poset) arises from topological spaces, whose standard power set orthocomplemented complete atomic lattice can be enriched by another complementation associating with any subset the set theoretical complement of its topological closure. This complementation satisfies only some properties of the algebraic version of an intuitionistic negation, and can be considered as, a generalized form of a Brouwer negation. The latter (called degenerate BZ poset) arises from the so-called special effects on a Hilbert space. It is shown that the standard Brouwer negation for effect operators produces a degenerate BZ poset with respect to the order induced from the partial sum operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. G. Birkhoff, Lattice theory, 3rd edn. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Busch, “Can quantum theoretical reality be considered sharp?,” in Recent Developments in Quantum Logic, P. Mittelstaedt and E. W. Stachow, eds. (Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1985), pp. 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Cattaneo, “A unified framework for the algebra of unsharp quantum mechanics,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 36, 3085–3117 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Cattaneo, “Abstract approximation spaces for rough theories,” in Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery, L. Polkowski and A. Skowron, eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1998), pp. 59–98.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Cattaneo, M. L. Dalla Chiara, and R. Giuntini, “Some algebraic structures for many- valued logics,” Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publication 15, 173–196 (1998) (Special Issue: Quantum Structures II, Dedicated to Gudrun Kalmbach).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Cattaneo and R. Giuntini, “Some results on BZ structures from Hilbertian unsharp quantum physics,” Found. Phys. 25, 1147–1183 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Cattaneo, R. Giuntini, and R. Pilla, “BZMVdM and Stonian MV algebras (applications to fuzzy sets and rough approximations),” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 108, 201–222 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Cattaneo and F. Lombardo, “Independent axiomatization of MV-algebras,” Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publication 15, 227–232 (1998) (Special Issue: Quantum Structures II, Dedicated to Gudrun Kalmbach).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Cattaneo and G. Marino, “Brouwer_Zadeh posets and fuzzy set theory,” in Proceedings of the 1st Napoli Meeting on Mathematics of Fuzzy Systems, A. Di Nola and A. Ventre, eds. (Napoli, June 1984), pp. 34–58.

  10. G. Cattaneo and G. Marino, “Partially ordered structures of fuzzy projections in Hilbert spaces,” in Proceedings of the 1st Napoli Meeting on Mathematics of Fuzzy Systems, A. Di Nola and A. Ventre, eds. (Napoli, June 1984), pp. 59–71.

  11. G. Cattaneo and G. Nisticò, “Brouwer-Zadeh posets and three valued Lukasiewicz posets,” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 33, 165–190 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. C. Chang, “Algebraic analysis of many valued logics,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 88, 467–490 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. L. Dalla Chiara and R. Giuntini, “Unsharp quantum logics,” Found. Phys. 24, 1161–1177 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. J. Foulis and M. K. Bennett, “Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics,” Found. Phys. 24, 1331–1352 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Garola, “Propositions and orthocomplementation in quantum logic,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 19, 369–387 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Giuntini and H. Greuling, “Toward a formal language for unsharp properties,” Found. Phys. 20, 931–935 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Greechie and S. Gudder, “Effect algebra counterexamples,” unpublished manuscript (1995).

  18. Z. Pavlak, “Rough sets,” Int. J. Inform. Comput. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Rasiowa and R. Sikorski, “The mathematics of metamathematics,” 3rd edn. (Monografie Matematyczne, vol. 41, Polish Scientific Publishers, Warszawa, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. van Dalen, “Intuitionistic Logic,” in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 3, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1986), pp. 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. S. Varadarajan, “Probability in physics and a theorem on simultaneous measurability,” Comm. Pure and Appl. Math. 25, 189–217 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. S. Varadarajan, Geometry of quantum physics. I (Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cattaneo, G., Giuntini, R. & Pulmannovà, S. Pre-BZ and Degenerate BZ Posets: Applications to Fuzzy Sets and Unsharp Quantum Theories. Foundations of Physics 30, 1765–1799 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026462620062

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026462620062

Keywords

Navigation