Skip to main content
Log in

What Is Fuzzy Probability Theory?

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article begins with a discussion of sets and fuzzy sets. It is observed that identifying a set with its indicator function makes it clear that a fuzzy set is a direct and natural generalization of a set. Making this identification also provides simplified proofs of various relationships between sets. Connectives for fuzzy sets that generalize those for sets are defined. The fundamentals of ordinary probability theory are reviewed and these ideas are used to motivate fuzzy probability theory. Observables (fuzzy random variables) and their distributions are defined. Some applications of fuzzy probability theory to quantum mechanics and computer science are briefly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. E.G. Beltrametti and S. Bugajski, “Quantum observables in classical frameworks,” Int.J.Theor.Phys. 34, 1221–1229 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.G. Beltrametti and S. Bugajski, “A classical extension of quantum mechanics,” J.Phys.A: Math.Gen. 28, 3329–3334 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.G.Beltrametti and S.Bugajski, “Effect algebras and statistical physical theories,” J.Math.Phys. (to appear).

  4. S. Bugajski, “Fundamentals of fuzzy probability theory,” Int.J.Theor.Phys. 35, 2229–2244 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.Bugajski, K.-E.Hellwig, and W.Stulpe, “On fuzzy random variables and statistical maps,” Rep.Math.Phys. (to appear).

  6. A. Dvurecenskij and B. Riecan, “On joint distributions of observables for F-quantum spaces,” Fuzzy Sets Sys. 39, 65–73 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Foulis and M.K. Bennett, “Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics,” Found.Phys. 24, 1331–1352 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Greechie and D. Foulis, “Transition to effect algebras,” Int.J.Theor.Phys. 34, 1369–1382 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Gudder, “Examples, problems and results in effect algebras,” Int.J.Theor.Phys. 35, 2365–2376 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Gudder, “Fuzzy probability theory,” Demon.Math. 31, 235–254 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Kôpka and F. Chovanec, “D-posets,” Math.Slovaca 44, 21–34 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G Ludwig, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Vols.vnI and II (Springer, Berlin, 1983-1985).

  13. R. Mesiar, “Fuzzy observables,” J.Math.Anal.Appl. 48, 178–193 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Mesiar and K. Piasecki, “Fuzzy observables and fuzzy random variables,” Busefal 42, 62–76 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Yager, “A note on probabilities of fuzzy events,” Information Sci. 128, 113–129 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L.A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information Cont. 8, 338–353 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L.A. Zadeh, “Probability measures and fuzzy events,” J.Math.Anal.Appl. 23, 421–427 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gudder, S. What Is Fuzzy Probability Theory?. Foundations of Physics 30, 1663–1678 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026450217337

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026450217337

Keywords

Navigation