Abstract
This article argues that only a developmental approach-one that views Derrida's 1967 work on Husserl, La Voix et la phénomène, in light of Derrida's three earlier encounters with Husserl's work and recognizes significant differences among them-is able to resolve the bitter controversy that has lately surrounded Derrida's Husserl interpretation. After first reviewing the impasse reached in these debates, the need for "a new hermeneutics of deconstruction" is set out, and, then, the reasons why strong development has been rejected internal to Derrida's corpus are discussed. After this, in a discussion of interest with respect to Husserl's own late teachings, as well as Derrida's standpoint, this article focuses on Derrida's 1962 "Introduction to Husserl's Origin." Against the prevailing interpretation, an argument is made showing that Derrida is much closer to Husserl's own positions than has been suspected, most importantly, in section VII of the "Introduction" where the theme of writing is first introduced. Thanks to this, that significant development in Derrida's thought does take place between 1962 and 1967 is demonstrated-and the present piece concludes by providing a brief sketch of the development of deconstruction overall as it came about through Derrida's repeated encounters with Husserlian phenomenology in the years 1954–67.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, Gaston, ed. Husserl: Cahiers de Royaumont (Paris: Minuit, 1959).
Berger, Gaston, The Cogito in Husserl's Philosophy. Trans. Kathleen McLaughlin (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974).
Bennington, Geoffrey, Derridabase (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
Bernet, Rudolf, “On Derrida's 'Introduction' to Husserl's Origin of Geometry,” in Derrida and Deconstruction, ed. Hugh Silverman (New York: Routledge, 1989).
Bernet, Rudolf, Kern, Iso, Marbach, Eduard, An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1995).
Biemel, Walter, “Les phases décisives dans le devéloppement de la philosophie de Husserl.” Berger 1959, pp. 32-59.
Carr, David, Phenomenology and the Problem of History (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974).
Cavaillès, Jean, Sur la logique et la théorie de la science (Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1997).
Dastur, Francoise, “Finitude and Repetition in Husserl and Derrida.” Lawlor 1994, pp. 113-130.
Depp, Dane, “A Husserlian Response to Derrida's Early Criticisms of Phenomenology,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 18 (3) (1987): 226-244.
Derrida, Jacques,Edmund Husserl's L'Origine de la Géométrie. (Paris: Presses Universitaire de France, 1962).
Derrida, Jacques, De la grammatologie (Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1967a) (DG).
Derrida, Jacques, La Voix et le phénomène: Introduction au problème du signe dans la phénomenologie de Husserl (Paris: Presses Universitaire de France, 1967b) (VP).
Derrida, Jacques, L'écriture et la différence (Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1967c) (ED).
Derrida, Jacques, Speech and Phenomena. Trans. David B. Allison (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973) (SP).
Derrida, Jacques, Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Spivak (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974) (OG).
Derrida, Jacques, Edmund Husserl's Origin of Geometry: An Introduction. Trans. John Leavey Jr. (Stony Brook, N.Y.: Nicholas Hays, 1978a) (I/O).
Derrida, Jacques, Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978b) (WD).
Derrida, Jacques, Positions. Trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981) (POS).
Derrida, Jacques, “Time of a Thesis,” in Philosophy in France Today, ed. Alan Montefiore (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983) (TT).
Derrida, Jacques, “Dialogue with Jacques Derrida,” in Dialogues with Contemporary Continental Thinkers, ed. Richard Kearney (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984).
Derrida, Jacques, “Ponctuations: le temps de la thèse” in Du droit à la philosophie (Paris: Galilee, 1990a).
Derrida, Jacques, Le problème de la genèse dans la philosophie de Husserl (Paris: Presses Universitaire de France, 1990b) (PG).
Derrida, Jacques, Points...,ed. Elisabeth Weber (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995).
Evans, J. Claude, Strategies of Deconstruction (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1991).
Evans, J. Claude, “Deconstruction: Theory and Practice,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 27 (1996): 313-317.
Evans, J. Claude, Kates, Joshua, Lawlor, Leonard, “A Forum on Strategies of Deconstruction,” Philosophy Today 42 (2) (1998): 146-230.
Gasché, Rodolphe, “On Representation, or Zigzagging with Husserl and Derrida.” Lawlor 1994, pp. 1-18.
Hobson, Marion, Jacques Derrida: Opening Lines (London: Routledge, 1998).
Hopkins, Burt C., “Derrida's Reading of Husserl in Speech and Phenomena,” Husserl Studies 2 (1985): 193-214.
Hopkins, Burt C., “Husserl and Derrida on the Origin of Geometry.” McKenna and Evans 1995, pp. 61-94.
Hopkins, Burt C., “Transcendental Ontologism and Derrida's Reading of Husserl,” Philosophy Today (Spring, 1996): 71-79.
Howells, Christina, Derrida: Deconstruction from Phenomenology to Ethics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998).
Kates, Joshua, “The Voice That Keeps Reading: Evans' Strategies of Deconstruction,” Philosophy Today 37 (1993): 318-335.
Kates, Joshua, “The Problem of Bedeutung in Derrida and Husserl.” Evans, Kates, Lawlor 1998, pp. 194-199.
Kates, Joshua, “Deconstruction and Skepticism: The First Wave,” Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology 33 (2) (May, 2002): 188-205.
Lawlor, Leonard, Imagination and Chance (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992).
Lawlor, Leonard, ed., Derrida's Interpretation of Husserl, The Southern Journal of Philosophy XXXII (supplement) (1994).
Lawlor, Leonard, “Phenomenology and Metaphysics: Deconstruction in La Voix et le Phénomène,” The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 27 (2) (1996a): 116-136.
Lawlor, Leonard, “The Event of Deconstruction,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 27 (3) (1996b): 313-319.
Lawlor, Leonard, “Distorting Phenomenology.” Evans, Kates, Lawlor, 1998, pp. 185-193.
Lawlor, Leonard, Derrida and Husserl: The Basic Problem of Phenomenology (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002).
Llewellyn, John, Derrida and the Threshold of Sense (London: Macmillan, 1986).
Marrati-Guénoun, Paola, La Genèse et la trace (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998).
McKenna, W., Evans, J. Claude, ed., Derrida and Phenomenology (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995).
Mohanty, J.N., The Possibility of Transcendental Phenomenology (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985).
Mohanty, J.N., Phenomenology: Between Essentialism and Transcendental Philosophy (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997).
Ricoeur, Paul, Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967).
Sallis, John, “Doublings.” Wood 1992, pp. 120-136.
Seebohm, Thomas, “The Apodicticity of Absence.” McKenna and Evans, 1995, pp. 195-200.
Smith, Barry, “Letter to the Times (London),” 1992, reprinted: Derrida 1995, pp. 419-421.
White, Alan, “Reconstructing Husserl: A Critical Response to Derrida's Speech and Phenomena,” Husserl Studies 4: 45-62.
Willard, Dallas, “Is Derrida's View of Ideal Being Rationally Defensible?” McKenna and Evans, 1995, pp. 23-42.
Wood, David, The Deconstruction of Time (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1989).
Wood, David, Derrida: A Critical Reader (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kates, J.L. Derrida, Husserl, and the Commentators: Introducing a Developmental Approach. Husserl Studies 19, 101–129 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024826028658
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024826028658