Abstract
The hypothesis that babyish-looking adult faces would elicit help was tested in a field experiment using the “lost letter” technique. Digitized images of African-American and European-American adult male and female faces were made to look babyish (neotenous) by substituting enlarged eyes and lips for normal ones. Eyes and lips were reduced in size to make faces look mature. As expected, neotenous features made adults appear submissive, weak, naive, feminine, compassionate, and honest, but not more or less attractive, relative to mature features. Neotenous or mature faces were printed on (fictional) resumes, attached to stamped, addressed envelopes, and “lost” in the US (n = 408) and Kenya (n = 176). “Helping” was indexed by whether resumes were posted (returned) or not. Most results supported predictions; across nations, resumes depicting neotenous, white and black female faces and neotenous, white male faces were returned more often than were resumes displaying the mature versions of these faces. Returns for neotenous and mature black male faces, however, were not significantly different. Overall, support was found for the hypothesis that neotenous, submissive-looking facial characteristics cue social approach and elicit help while mature, dominant-looking facial traits cue avoidance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alley, T. R. (1988). The effects of growth and aging on facial aesthetics. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 51–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anthony, T., Copper, C., & Mullen, B. (1992). Cross-racial facial identification: A social cognitive integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 296–301.
Barefoot, J. C., & Strickland, L. H. (1977). The confidentiality of "confidential" lost letters. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 123–126.
Berry, D. S., & Landry, J. C. (1997). Facial maturity and daily social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 570–580.
Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. A. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3–18.
Bridges, F. S., Anzalone, D. A., Ryan, S. W., & Anzalone, F. L. (2002). Extensions of the lost letter technique to divisive issues of Creationism, Darwinism, sex, education, and gay and lesbian affiliations. Psychological Reports, 90, 391–400.
Bridges, F. S., & Clark, S. M. (2000). Differences in the lost letter responses from smaller rural communities. North American Journal of Psychology, 2, 121–126
Bridges, F. S., Williamson, C. B., Thompson, P. C., & Windsor, M. A. (2001). Lost letter technique: Returned responses to battered and abused women, men, and lesbians. North American Journal of Psychology, 3, 263–276.
Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own-and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 139–155.
Collins, M., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (1995). The contributions of appearance to occupational outcomes in civilian and military settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 129–163.
Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925–935.
Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Philhower, C. L. (2002). Dimensions of facial physical attractiveness: The intersection of biology and culture. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.) Advances in visual cognition, volume 1: Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 193–238). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61–72.
Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Wu, C., Barbee, A. P., & Druen, P. B. (1995). "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the crosscultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1975). Ethology: The biology of behavior. (second ed). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Enlow, D. H. (1982). Handbook of facial growth. (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Gray, H. (1948). Anatomy of the human body. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Guthrie, R. D. (1970). Evolution of human threat display organs. In T. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, & W. C. Steere (Eds.) Evolutionary Biology, 4 (pp. 257–302). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Guthrie, R. D. (1976). Body hot spots: The anatomy of human social organ and behavior. New York: Van Nostrand.
Jones, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology, 36, 723–748.
Keating, C. F. (1985a). Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 61–70.
Keating, C. F. (1985b). Human dominance signals: The primate in us. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 89–108). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Keating, C. F. (2002). Charismatic faces: Social status cues put face appeal in perspective. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in visual cognition, volume 1: Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive,and social perspectives (pp. 153–192). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Keating, C. F., & Bai, D. (1986). Children's attributions of social dominance from facial cues. Child Development, 57, 1269–1276.
Keating, C. F., & Doyle, J. (2002). The faces of desirable mates and dates contain mixed social status cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 414–424.
Keating, C. F., Mazur, A. C., & Segall, M. H. (1981). A cross-cultural exploration of physiognomic traits of dominance and happiness. Ethology and Sociobiology, 2, 41–48.
Keating, C. F., Randall, D., & Kendrick, T. (1999). Presidential physiognomies: Altered images, altered perceptions. Political Psychology, 20, 593–610.
Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, I, 115–121.
Lippman, B., & Keating, C. F. (2002). The face-ism in racism: An examination of physiognomy's role in the attribution of racial stereotypes to black and white faces. Unpublished manuscript.
Lorenz, K. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen moglicher Erfahrung. Zietschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 5, 234–409.
Mazur, A. C. (1973). A cross-species comparison of status in small, established groups. American Sociological Review, 38, 513–530.
Mazur, A. C., Mazur, J., & Keating, C. F. (1984). Military rank attainment of a West Point class: Effects of cadets' physical features. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 125–150.
McArthur, L. A., & Berry, D. S. (1987). Cross-cultural agreement in perceptions of babyfaced adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 165–192.
McCabe, V. (1988). Facial proportions, perceived age, and caregiving. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 89–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Milgram, S., Mann, L., & Harter, S. (1965). The lost-letter-technique: A tool of social research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 437–438.
Montepare, J. M., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (1998). Person perception comes of age: The salience and significance of age in social judgments. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 93–161.
Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (1997). Facial dominance in Homo sapiens as honest signaling of male quality. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 569–579.
Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D.L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742.
Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.
Pittenger, J. B., Shaw, R. E., & Mark, L. S. (1979). Perceptual information for the age level of faces as a higher order invariant of growth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 481–492.
Rhodes, G., Sumich, A., & Byatt, G. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science, 10, 52–58.
Rossi, P. H., & Anderson, A. B. (1982). The factorial survey apporach: An introduction. In P. H. Rossi & S. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (pp. 15–67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Secord, P. F., Dukes, W. F., & Bevan, W. (1953). Occupational and physiognomic stereotypes in the perception of photographs. Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 261–270.
Shepherd, J. (1981) Social factors in face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (eds.)Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 55–80). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zebrowitz, L. A., Brownlow, S., & Olson, K. (1992). Baby talk to the babyfaced. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 143–158.
Zebrowitz, L. A., & Collins, M. A. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 204–223.
Zebrowitz, L. A., & McDonald, S. M. (1991). The impact of litigants' baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 603–623.
Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (1992). Impressions of babyfaced males and females across the lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1143–1152.
Zebrowitz, L. A., Montepare, J. M., & Lee, H. K. (1993). They don't all look alike: Individuated impressions of other racial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 85–101.
Zebrowitz, L. A., Tenenbaum, D. R., & Goldstein, L. H. (1991). The impact of job applicants' facial maturity, gender, and academic achievement on hiring recommendations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 525–548.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keating, C.F., Randall, D.W., Kendrick, T. et al. Do Babyfaced Adults Receive More Help? The (Cross-Cultural) Case of the Lost Resume. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27, 89–109 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023962425692
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023962425692