Abstract
The nominal installed capacity utilization factor for power-generating units in different types of nuclear power plants is analyzed. It is shown that this indicator does not correlate with the operative regulation for servicing power-generating units, and it does not take into account the probability of unanticipated power decreases due to equipment failures and the present operating conditions of nuclear power plants in the common power system operating in Russia.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Yu. M. Shestakov, “Comparison of the main technical-economic indicators of Russian and foreign nuclear power plants,” in: Economics of the Nuclear Industry, TSIIatominform, Moscow (2001).
Technical Servicing and Repair of Systems and Equipment in Nuclear Power Plants. Standard Duration of Repair Operations on Power-Generating Units in Nuclear Power Plants, RD ÉO-0085-97, Moscow (1997).
Temporary Methodological Instructions for Calculating the Working Power of Power-Generating Units in Nuclear Electric-Power Plants, RD ÉO 0077-97, Moscow (1997).
Rules for Organizing Technical Maintenance and Repair Work on Equipment in Nuclear Power Plants, RD 53.025.002-88, Moscow (1988).
E. M. Sigal, “FORÉM as a factor influencing the installed capacity utilization factor of a nuclear power plant,” At. Énerg., 90, No.2, 101–106 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sigal, E.M. Nominal Installed Capacity Utilization Factor (ICUF) as an Indicator of the Installed Capacity Utilization Efficiency of a Nuclear Power Plant. Atomic Energy 94, 71–75 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023631702553
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023631702553