Skip to main content
Log in

Size-mass relationships of stream invertebrates in a northern Spain stream

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show the regression equations that relate the head width of 10 freshwater insect species or the length of the first thoracic segment of 2 amphipods with their dry mass in 3 reaches along a small stream in northern Spain. Spatial differences in size–mass relationships were found. Organisms stored in alcohol showed lower dry mass than those specimens that were dried immediately after collection. The use of both size measures for dry mass estimation in field samples is discussed. It is recommended that the size–mass relationships be constructed using non-preserved organisms. Furthermore, great care is required when such allometric equations are taken from the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basset, A. & D. S. Glazier, 1995. Resource limitation and intraspecific patterns of weight ? length variation among spring detritivores. Hydrobiologia 316: 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benke, A. C., A. D. Huryn, L. A. Smock & J. B. Wallace, 1999. Length–mass relationships for freshwater macroinvertebrates in North America with particular reference to the southeastern United States. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 18: 308–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgherr, P. & E. I. Meyer, 1997. Regression analysis of linear body dimensions vs. dry mass in stream macroinvertebrates. Arch. Hydrobiol. 139: 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. W. & F. J. Wrona, 1992. Life history and production of the predatory caddisfly Rhyacophila vao Milne in a spring-fed stream. Freswat. Biol. 27: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, G. L.& C. G. Paterson, 1977. Effects of preservation on wet weight biomass of chironomid larvae. Hydrobiologia 53: 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon, D., 1995. Life history, secondary production and microdistribution of Hydrocyphon (Coleoptera: Scirtidae) in a tropical forest stream. Arch. Hydrobiol. 133: 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, S. L. & T. M. Burton, 1994. A comparison of Acroneuria lycorias (Plecoptera) production and growth in northern Michigan hard-and soft-water streams. Freshwat. Biol. 32: 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elósegui, A. & J. Pozo, 1994. Spatial versus temporal variability in the physical and chemical characteristics of the Agüera stream (Northern Spain). Acta Oecol. 15: 543–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elãsegui, A. & J. Pozo, 1998. Epilithic biomass and metabolism in a north Iberian stream. Aquat. Sci. 60: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elósegui, A., X. Arana, A. Basaguren & J. Pozo, 1995. Selfpurification processes along a medium-sized stream. Environ. Manag. 19: 931–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. H. R., 1988. Population dynamics and morphometrics of Gammarus pulex L.: evidence of seasonal food limitation in a freshwater detritivore. Freshwat. Biol. 19: 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, E. & J. Pozo, 1996. Longitudinal and temporal patterns of benthic coarse particulate organic matter in the Agüera stream (northern Spain). Aquat. Sci. 58: 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, J. M., A. Basaguren & J. Pozo, 2000. Life history and secondary production of Ephemerella ignita (Poda) (Ephemeroptera, Ephemerellidae) in a north Iberian stream. Arch. Hydrobiol. 147: 535–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, J. M., A. Basaguren & J. Pozo, 2001. Life history and production of Caenis luctuosa (Burmeister) (Ephemeroptera, Caenidae) in two nearby reaches along a small stream. Hydrobiologia 452: 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, M. B., S. A. Perry & W. B. Perry, 1993. Growth and secondary production of Paracapnia angulata Hanson (Plecoptera: Capniidae) in Appalachian streams affected by acid precipitation. Can J. Zool. 71: 735–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, B. A., J. F. Flannagan & T. D. Galloway, 1988. Production of Hexagenia limbata (Serville) and Ephemera simulans (Ephemeroptera) in Dauphin Lake, Manitoba, with a note on weight loss due to preservatives. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 45: 774–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howmiller, R. P., 1972. Effects of preservation on weights of some common macrobenthic invertebrates. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 4: 743–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, T. & R. A. Cunjak, 1999. Dry mass–length relationships for benthic insects: a review with new data from Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick, Canada. Freshwat. Biol. 41: 653–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez de Luzuriaga, A., 1995. Dinámica y colonización perifíticas en el río Agùera. Tesis de licenciatura. Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. Bilbao.

  • Leuven, R. S. E. W., T. C. M. Brock & H. A. M. Van Druten, 1985. Effects of preservation on dry-and ash-free dry weight biomass of some common aquatic macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 127: 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, R. & G. Hehir, 1999. Growth, production and mortality of two species of Agapetus (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae) in the Acheron River, south-east Australia. Freshwat. Biol. 42: 655–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E., 1989. The relationship between body length parameters and dry mass in running water invertebrates. Arch. Hydrobiol. 117: 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, E., 1982. Production of Gammarus pulex L. (Amphipoda) in a small Danish stream. Hydrobiologia 87: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perán, A., J. Velasco & A. Millán, 1999. Life cycle and secondary production of Caenis luctuosa (Ephemeroptera) in a semiarid stream (Southeast Spain). Hydrobiologia 400: 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poepperl, R., 1998. Biomass determination of aquatic invertebrates in the Northern German lowland using the relationship between body length and dry mass. Faun-Ökol. Mitt. 7: 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poepperl, R., 2000. Benthic secondary production and biomass of insects emerging from a northern German temperate stream. Freshwat. Biol. 44: 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, P., 1987. Biomasseparameter der Larvenstadien mitteleuropäischer Kriebelmückenarten (Diptera: Simuliidae). Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 77: 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, R. A., E. H. Stanley, J. W. Harrison & C. R. Epperson, 1987. Production of Corydalus cornutus (Megaloptera) in four streams differing in size, flow and temperature. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 212–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, L. A., 1980. Relationships between body size and biomass of aquatic insects. Freshwat. Biol. 10: 375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practise of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, USA: 887 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towers, D. J., J. M. Henserson, & C. J. Veltam, 1994. Predicting dry weight of New Zealand aquatic macroinvertebrates from linear dimensions. NZ J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 28: 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, F., E. Meyer & J. Schwoerbel, 1990. Morphometry and biomass determination of dominant mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera) in running waters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 118: 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiles, M. R., B. S. Goldowitz & R. E. Charlton, 1999. Life history and production of a semi-terrestrial limnephilid caddisfly in an intermittent Platte River wetland. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 18: 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H., 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: 622 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González, J.M., Basaguren, A. & Pozo, J. Size-mass relationships of stream invertebrates in a northern Spain stream. Hydrobiologia 489, 131–137 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023220501921

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023220501921

Navigation