Abstract
This article studies the monotonicity behavior of plural determinersthat quantify over collections. Following previous work, we describe thecollective interpretation of determiners such as all, some andmost using generalized quantifiers of a higher type that areobtained systematically by applying a type shifting operator to thestandard meanings of determiners in Generalized Quantifier Theory. Twoprocesses of counting and existential quantification thatappear with plural quantifiers are unified into a single determinerfitting operator, which, unlike previous proposals, both capturesexistential quantification with plural determiners and respects theirmonotonicity properties. However, some previously unnoticed factsindicate that monotonicity of plural determiners is not always preservedwhen they apply to collective predicates. We show that the proposedoperator describes this behavior correctly, and characterize themonotonicity of the collective determiners it derives. It is proved thatdeterminer fitting always preserves monotonicity properties ofdeterminers in their second argument, but monotonicity in the firstargument of a determiner is preserved if and only if it is monotonic inthe same direction in the second argument. We argue that this asymmetryfollows from the conservativity of generalized quantifiers innatural language.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barwise, J. and Cooper, R., 1981, “Generalized quantifiers and natural language,” Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.
Bennett, M., 1974, “Some extensions of a Montague fragment of English,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of California Los Angeles.
Chierchia, G., 1998, “Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of 'semantic parameter',” pp. 53–104 in Events and Grammar, S. Rothstein, ed., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dalrymple, M., Kanazawa, M., Kim, Y., Mchombo, S., and Peters, S., 1998, “Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity,” Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 159–210.
Fauconnier, G., 1978, “Implication reversal in a natural language,” pp. 289–301 in Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, F. Guenthner and S.J. Schmidt, eds., Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Hauser, R., 1974, “Quantification in an extended Montague grammar,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Keenan, E. and Stavi, J., 1986, “A semantic characterization of natural language determiners,” Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253–326.
Keenan, E. and Westerståhl, D., 1996, “Generalized quantifiers in linguistics and logic,” pp. 837–893 in Handbook of Logic and Language, J. Van Benthem and A. ter Meulen, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Krifka, M., 1992, “Definite NPs aren't quantifiers,” Linguistic Inquiry 23, 156–163.
Ladusaw, W., 1979, “Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
Link, G., 1983, “The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice theoretical approach,” pp. 302–323 in Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow, eds., Berlin: De Gruyter.
Scha, R., 1981, “Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification,” pp. 483–512 in Formal Methods in the Study of Language, J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof, and T.M.V. Janssen, eds., Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
Schein, B., 1993, Plurals and Events, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schwarzschild, R., 1996, Pluralities, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sharvy, R., 1980, “A more general theory of definite descriptions,” The Philosophical Review 89, 607–624.
Szabolcsi, A., 1997, “Strategies for scope taking,” pp. 109–154 in Ways of Scope Taking, A. Szabolcsi, ed., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Van Benthem, J., 1984, “Questions about quantifiers,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 443–466.
Van Benthem, J., 1986, Essays in Logical Semantics, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Van Benthem, J., 1991, Language in Action: Categories, Lambdas and Dynamic Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Van der Does, J., 1992, “Applied quantifier logics: Collectives, naked infinitives,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Van der Does, J., 1993, “Sums and quantifiers,” Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 509–550.
Winter, Y., 1998, “Flexible Boolean Semantics: Coordination, plurality and scope in natural language,” Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University.
Winter, Y., 2000, “Distributivity and dependency,” Natural Language Semantics 8, 27–69.
Winter, Y., 2001, Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics: Coordination, Plurality and Scope in Natural Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ben-Avi, G., Winter, Y. Monotonicity and Collective Quantification. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 127–151 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022305918225
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022305918225