Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Network Externalities and Indirect Tax Preferences for Electronic Commerce

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although most arguments supporting preferential tax treatment of electronic commerce are suspect, the existence of network externalities provides one potentially defensible rationale. This paper considers (1) direct network externalities, which arise in communications networks like the Internet, (2) indirect network externalities, which arise in computer hardware/software systems in imperfectly competitive markets, and (3) learning network externalities, which arise when existing network participants assist new users. It concludes the case for preferential treatment is weak, and that proposed blanket sales tax exemptions of remote (or all) e-commerce are especially inappropriate. Finally, the paper comments briefly on US sales tax reform efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce. (2000). “Report to Congress.” http://www.ecommercecommission.org/acec report.pdf.

  • Altig, D. and P. Rupert. (1999). “Growth and the Internet: Surfing to Prosperity.” Economic Commentary September 1. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

  • Bird, R. M. (2001). “Taxation and Electronic Commerce.” Manuscript. Univ. of Toronto.

  • Bird, R. M. and P. P. Gendron. (2000). “CVAT, VIVAT and Dual VAT: Vertical Sharing and Interstate Trade.” International Tax and Public Finance 7, 753–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Consulting Group. (2000). “The Race for Online Riches: E-Retailing in Europe.” http://bcg.com/publications/files/ERetailing%20in%20Europe%201999.pdf.

  • Bruce, D. and W. Fox. (2000). “E-Commerce in the Context of Declining State Sales Tax Bases.” National Tax Journal 53, 1373–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, D., W. Fox and M. Murray. (2001). “To Tax or not To Tax? The Case of Electronic Commerce.” Manuscript. University of Tennessee, Knoxville. http://web.utk.edu/?dbruce/efficiency.

  • Cnossen, S. (2001). Tax Policy in the European Union: A Review of Issues and Options. Rotterdam: OCFEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppel, J. (2000). “E-Commerce: Impacts and Policy Challenges.” Economics Department Working Papers No. 252. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Due, J. F. and J. L. Mikesell. (1994). Sales Taxation: State and Local Structure and Administration. Washington DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. and C. Himmelberg. (1995a). “Critical Mass and Network Evolution in Telecommunications.” In G. Brock (ed.), Toward a Competitive Telecommunications Industry, Selected Papers from the 1994 Telecommunications Policy Research Conference. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. and C. Himmelberg. (1995b). “Critical Mass and Network Size with Application to the US Fax Market.” Discussion Paper No. EC-95–11. Stern School of Business, NYU. http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/95–11.pdf.

  • Economides, N. (1996). “The Economics of Networks.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 14, 673–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1998). “E-Commerce and Indirect Taxation.” COM(98) 374. http://europa.eu.int/comm/taxation customs/publications/official doc/com/taxation/com3741998/967en.pdf.

  • Fox, W. F. and M. N. Murray. (1997). “The Sales Tax and Electronic Commerce: So What's New?” National Tax Journal 50, 573–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandal, N. (1995). “A Selective Survey of the Literature on Indirect Network Externalities: A Discussion of Liebowitz and Margolis.” Research in Law and Economics 17, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, A. (2000). “In a World Without Borders: The Impact of Taxes on Internet Commerce.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 561–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, A. and P. J. Klenow. (2000). “Evidence on Learning and Network Externalities in the Diffusion of Home Computers.” Manuscript. University of Chicago. http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/austan.goolsbee/research/computer.pdf.

  • Goolsbee, A. and J. Zittrain. (1999). “Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Taxing Internet Commerce.” National Tax Journal 52, 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A. (1990). “The Uniform Tax Controversy.” In V. Tanzi (ed.), Public Finance, Trade and Development. Detroit MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein, W. (1997). Transaction Taxes and Electronic Commerce: Designing State Taxes that Work in an Interstate Environment.” National Tax Journal 50, 593–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDC Research. (2002). “Half of Europeans Now Online.” http://www.nua.ie/surveys/?f=VS&artid=905357608&rel=true. Juniper Communications. (1999). “Internet Market Forecast.” http://www.jup.com/jupiter/release.

  • Katz, M. L. and C. Shapiro. (1994). “Systems Competition and Network Effects.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(2), 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. L. and C. Shapiro. (1985). “Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility.” American Economic Review 75, 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M. and S. Smith. (2000). “Viva VIVAT.” International Tax and Public Finance 7, 741–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S. J. and S. Margolis. (1994). “Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(2), 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie-Mason, J. and H. Varian. (1996). “Some Economics of the Internet.” In Werner Sichel (ed.), Networks, Infrastructure and the New Task for Regulation. Ann-Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerov, M. and I. J. Lav. (1998). “Problems with a ‘Moratorium’ on Internet Commerce Taxation.” State Tax Notes 14(May 25), 1697–1723.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, C. E., Jr. (1997). “Taxation of Electronic Commerce: Economic Objectives, Technological Constraints, and Tax Law.” Tax Law Review 52, 269–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, C. E., Jr. (1999). “Electronic Commerce and the State Retail Sales Tax: A Challenge to American Federalism.” International Tax and Public Finance 6, 193–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, C. E., Jr. (2000a). “Rethinking State and Local Reliance on the Retail Sales Tax: ShouldWe Fix the State Sales Tax or Discard It?” Brigham Young University Law Review 2000, 77–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, C. E., Jr. (2000b). “Implementing Subnational Value Added Taxes on Internal Trade: The Compensating VAT.” International Tax and Public Finance 7, 723–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, C. E., Jr. (2001). “Taxation of Electronic Commerce in the EU.” Manuscript. Hoover Institution. Stanford University. http://www.few.eur.nl/few/research/ocfeb/congreseu/papers.htm.

  • McLure, C. E., Jr. (forthcoming (a)). “EU and US Sales Taxes in the Digital Age.” Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation.

  • McLure, C. E., Jr. (forthcoming (b)). “Sales and Use Taxes on Electronic Commerce: Legal, Economic, Administrative, and Political Issues.” Urban Lawyer.

  • McLure, C. E., Jr. and G. R. Zodrow. (1987). Treasury I and the Tax Reform Act of 1986: The Economics and Politics of Tax Reform.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1(1), 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mediamark Research, Inc. (1999). “Facts and Figures.” http://www.internetindicators.com/facts1.html.

  • National Governors’ Association. (1999). “Streamlining State Sales Tax Systems Policy.” http://www.nga.org/nga/legislativeUpdate/1.1169.C POLICY POSITION^D 489.00.html.

  • National Tax Association. (1999). “Communications and Electronic Commerce Tax Project: Final Report.” http://www.ntanet.org/ecommerce/final.pdf.

  • Nellen, A. (1999). “Overview to E-Commerce Taxation-Guide to Understanding the Current Discussions and Debates.” http://www.cob.sjsu.edu/facstaff/nellen a/.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (1998). “Electronic Commerce: Taxation Framework Conditions.” http://www.oecd.org/catch 404/?404;http://www.oecd.org/daf/fa/e com/framewke.pdf.

  • Sandmo, A. (1975). “Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities.” Swedish Journal of Economics 77, 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. and H. R. Varian. (1999). Information Rules. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streamlined Sales Tax Project. (2001). “Streamlined Sales Tax System for the 21st Century.” http://www.geocities.com/streamlined2000/.

  • Sullivan, D., S. Walters, J. W. Abolins and G. Abi-Esber. (1999). “Submission to the Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce on Behalf of Taxware International, Inc.” www.ecommercecommission.org/document/TaxWareFedReg.doc.

  • Weiner, J. M. (2001). “The European Union and Formula Apportionment.” European Taxation 10, 380–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. (2001). “The Internet Sales Tax Debate: Sorting Through the Economic Issues.” State Tax Notes 22(December 24), 1001–1013.

  • Zodrow, G. R. (1999). State Sales and Income Taxes. College Station: Texas A&M Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zodrow, G. R. (2000). “Evaluating the Case for a Temporary Moratorium on the Taxation of Electronic Commerce.” State Tax Notes 19(December 4), 1515–1521.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics Department, Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX, 77005, USA

    George R. Zodrow

Authors
  1. George R. Zodrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zodrow, G.R. Network Externalities and Indirect Tax Preferences for Electronic Commerce. International Tax and Public Finance 10, 79–97 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022281013965

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022281013965

Search

Navigation