Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancement of phase separation by the addition of de-emulsifiers to three-phase (diesel oil/biocatalyst/aqueous phase) emulsion in diesel biodesulfurization

  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethanol, added as a de-emulsifier to separate oil and biocatalyst (or bacterial cells) from a three-phase (oil/biocatalyst/aqueous phase) emulsion, formed in diesel biodesulfurization employing Gordonia nitida, improved oil recovery by centrifugation from about 50% in its absence to almost 100% at 3% (v/v). The biocatalyst recovered with ethanol addition showed similar specific growth rates (0.03 h−1) and dibenzothiophene desulfurization rates (6–7.2 mol l−1 h−1) to those (0.03 h−1 and 7.1 mol l−1, respectively) of the biocatalyst recovered with no ethanol addition. The desulfurization activity significantly increased as the number of the repeated recovery and reuse of the biocatalyst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang JH, Chang YK, Cho KS, Chang HN (2000a) Desulfurization of model and diesel oils by resting cells of Gordona sp. CYKS1. Biotechnol. Lett. 22: 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang JH, Chang YK, Ryu HW, Chang HN (2000b) Desulfurization of light gas oil in immobilized-cell systems of Gordona sp. CYKS1 and Nocardia sp. CYKS2. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 182: 309–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang JH, Kim YJ, Lee BH, Cho KS, Ryu HW, Chang YK, Chang HN (2001) Production of a desulfurization biocatalyst by twostage fermentation and its application for the treatment of model and diesel oils. Biotechnol. Prog. 17: 876–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linguist L, Pacheco M (1999) Enzyme-based diesel desulfurization process offers energy, CO2 advantages. Oil Gas J. 97: 45–48. McFarland BC (1999) Biodesulfurization. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2: 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland BC, Boron DJ, Deever W, Meyer JA, Johnson AR, Atlas RM (1998) Biocatalytic sulfur removal from fuels: applicability for producing low sulfur gasoline. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 24: 99–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monticello DJ (2000) Biodesulfurization and the upgrading of petroleum distillates. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11: 540–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee SK, Chang JH, Chang YK, Chang HN (1998) Desulfulrization of dibenzothiophene and diesel oils by a newly isolated Gordona stratin, CYKS1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 2327–2331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, SK, Lee GM, Yoon JH, Park YH, Bae HS, Lee ST (1997) Anaerobic and aerobic degradation of pyridine by a newly isolated denitrifying bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 2578–2585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight JG (1981) The Desulfurization of Heavy Oils and Residue. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Meyer T, Folsom B (1998) Oil/water/biocatalyst three-phase separation process. US Patent No 5,772,901.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Keun Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, O.K., Cho, K.S., Ryu, H.W. et al. Enhancement of phase separation by the addition of de-emulsifiers to three-phase (diesel oil/biocatalyst/aqueous phase) emulsion in diesel biodesulfurization. Biotechnology Letters 25, 73–77 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021750719337

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021750719337

Navigation