Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of Rhizoctonia solani Associated with Soybean in Brazil

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani causes pre- and post-emergence damping-off, root and hypocotyl rot and foliar blight in soybean. Foliar blight has resulted in yield losses of 31–60% in north and northeast Brazil. The aim of this study was to characterize isolates of R. solani associated with soybean in Brazil. Among 73 Rhizoctonia isolates examined, six were binucleate and 67 were multinucleate. The multinucleate iso1ates were characterized according to hyphal anastomosis reaction, mycelial growth rate, thiamine requirement, sclerotia production, and RAPD molecular markers. Four isolates that caused hypocotyl rot belonged to AG-4 and using RAPD analysis they grouped together with the HGI subgroup. Another isolate that caused root and hypocotyl rots was thiamine auxotrophic, grew at 35°C, and belonged to AG-2-2 IIIB. All 62 isolates that caused foliar blight belonged to AG-1 IA. RAPD analysis of R. solani AG-1 IA soybean isolates showed high genetic similarity to a tester strain of AG-1 IA, confirming their classification. The teleomorph of R. solani, Thanatephorus cucumeris was produced in vitro by one AG-1 IA isolate from soybean. The AG-4 and AG-2-2 IIIB isolates caused damping-off and root and hypocotyl rots of soybean seedlings cv. ‘FT-Cristalina’, under greenhouse conditions. The AG-2-2 IIIB isolate caused large lesions on the cortex tissue, that was distinct from the symptoms caused by AG-4 isolates. The AG-1 IA isolates caused foliar blight in adult soybean plants cv. ‘Xingu’ under the greenhouse and also in a detached-leaf assay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins G Jr and Lewis WD (1954) Rhizoctonia aerial blight of soybean in Louisiana. Phytopathology 44: 215–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolkan HA and Ribeiro WRC (1985) Anastomosis groups and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani isolates from Brazil. Plant Disease 69: 599–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE (1996) Grouping in Rhizoctonia solani by hyphal anastomosis reaction. In: Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S and Dijst G (eds) Rhizoctonia Species: Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control (pp 37–47) Kluwer Academic Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE (2000) Anastomosis groups and subsets of anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Rhizoctonia, Taichung, pp 14 (Abstr.)

  • Carling DE, Leiner RH and Kebler KM (1987) Characterization of a new anastomosis group (AG-9) of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 77: 1609–1612

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE, Rothrock CS, MacNish GC, Sweetingham MW, Brainard KA and Winters SW (1994) Characterization of anastomosis group 11 (AG-11) of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 84: 1387–1393

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro C, Davis JR and Wiese MV (1988) Quantitative estimation of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 in soil. Phytopathology 78: 1287–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceresini PC and Souza NL (1997) Associaç ão de Rhizoctonia spp. binucleadas e de R. solani Kühn AG 4 HGI e AG 2–2 IIIB ao feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) no estado de São Paulo. Summa Phytopathologica 23: 14–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceresini PC, Fenille RC and Souza NL (1996) Associaç ão de Rhizoctonia spp. binucleadas e de R. solani Kühn AG 4 HGI í vagens de amendoinzeiro (Arachis hypogaea) no Estado de São Paulo. Summa Phytopathologica 22: 145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey CB and Papavizas GC (1959) Effect of organic soil amendments on the Rhizoctonia disease of snap beans. Agronomy Journal 51: 493–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Embrapa (1999) Recomendaç ões técnicas para a cultura da soja na região central do Brasil 1999/2000. (226 p) Embrapa Soja, Londrina (Documentos, 132)

  • Exner B (1953) Comparative studies of four rhizoctonias in Louisiana. Mycologia 45: 698–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenille RC and Souza NL (1999) Efeitos de materiais organicos e da umidade do solo na patogenicidade de Rhizoctonia solani KühnAG-4 HGI ao feijoeiro. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 34: 1959–1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Harville BG, Russin JS and Habetz RJ (1996) Rhizoctonia foliar blight reactions and seed yields in soybean. Crop Science 36: 563–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyakumachi M and Ui T (1988) Development of the teleomorph of non-self-anastomosing isolates of Rhizoctonia solani by a buried-slide method. Plant Pathology 37: 438–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyakumachi M, Mushika T, Ogiso Y, Toda T, Kageyama K and Tsuge T (1998) Characterization of a new cultural type (LP) of Rhizoctonia solani AG2–2 isolated from warm-season turfgrasses, and its genetic differentiation from other cultural types. Plant Pathology 47: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabaji-Hare SH, Meller Y, Gill S and Charest PM (1990) Investigation of genetic relatedness among anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani using cloned DNA probes. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 12: 393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RK and Belmar SB (1989) Characterization and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp. isolated from rice, soybean, and other crops grown in rotation with rice in Texas. Plant Disease 73: 1004–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangatharalingam N and Carson ML (1988) Technique to induce sporulation in Thanatephorus cucumeris. Plant Disease 72: 146–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko W and Hora KF (1971) A selective medium for the quantitative determination of Rhizoctonia solani in soil. Phytopathology 61: 707–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuninaga S and Carling DE (2000) Comparison of isolates of Rhizoctonia solani AG-2 and AG-BI based on anastomosis reactions, rDNA sequence analysis and pathogenic potential. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Rhizoctonia, Taichung, p 23 (Abstr.)

  • Kuninaga S and Yokosawa R (1984) DNA base sequence homology in Rhizoctonia solani K¨uhn IV. Genetic relatedness within AG-4. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 50: 322–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuramae-Izioka EE (1997) A rapid, easy and high yield protocol for total genomic DNA isolation from Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Fusarium oxysporum for RAPD. Revista Unimar 19: 683–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z and Sinclair JB (1991) Isolates of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 2–2 pathogenic to soybean. Plant Disease 75: 682–687

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNish GC and O'Brien PA (2000) RAPD-PCR used to support concept of sub-populations within Rhizoctonia solani AG-8. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Rhizoctonia, Taichung, p 41 (Abstr.)

  • Martin SB (1987) Rapid tentative identification of Rhizoctonia spp. associated with diseased turfgrasses. Plant Disease 71: 47–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MC and Yorinori JT (1999) Incidência de doenças da soja em regiões tropicais. In: Congresso Brasileiro de Soja, Londrina, p 457 (Abstr.)

  • Muyolo NG, Lipps PE and Schmitthenner AF (1993a) Anastomosis grouping and variation in virulence among isolates of Rhizoctonia solani associated with dry bean and soybean in Ohio and Zaire. Phytopathology 83: 438–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Muyolo NG, Lipps PE and Schmitthenner AF (1993b) Reactions of dry bean, lima bean, and soybean cultivars to Rhizoctonia root and hypocotyl rot and web blight. Plant Disease 77: 234–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiki T and Ui T (1981) Rhizoctonia root rot of bean, soybean and adzukibean seedlings. Memoirs of the Faculty of Agriculture of Hokkaido University 12: 262–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Naito S (1984) Studies on foliage blight of sugar beets. Research Bulletin of the Hokkaido National Agricultural Experiment Station 139: 145–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Naito S, Mochida H, Nakajima T and Ohto Y (1995) Infection with basidiospores of Thanatephorus cucumeris (AG-2–3 of Rhizoctonia solani) and development of soybean foliar blight lesions. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 61: 362–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Naito S, Mohamad D, Nasution A and Purwanti H (1993) Soilborne diseases and ecology of pathogens on soybean roots in Indonesia. JARQ (Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly) 26: 247–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogoshi A (1987) Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Annual Review of Phytopathology 25: 125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogoshi A and Ui T (1979) Specificity in vitamin requirement among anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 45: 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter JR Jr, Sherwood RT and Platt WD (1969) Anastomosis grouping among isolates of Thanatephorus cucumeris. Phytopathology 59: 1270–1278

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual CB, Toda T, Raymondo AD and Hyakumachi M (2000) Characterization by conventional techniques and PCR of Rhizoctonia solani isolates causing banded leaf sheath blight in maize. Plant Pathology 49: 108–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1992) NTSYS-PC Version 1.7 Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Exeter Software Publ, Setauket, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood RT (1969) Morphology and physiology in four anastomosis groups of Thanatephorus cucumeris. Phytopathology 59: 1924–1929

    Google Scholar 

  • Shew HD and Main CE (1990) Infection and development of target spot of flue-cured tobacco caused by Thanatephorus cucumeris. Plant Disease 74: 1009–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneh B, Burpee L and Ogoshi A (1991) Identification of Rhizoctonia Species (133 p) American Phytopathological Society, Saint Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens-Johnk J and Jones K (1993) Characterization of Rhizoctonia solani by analysis by of cellular fatty acids. Phytopathology 83: 278–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JJ, Jones RK, Shew HD and Carling DE (1993) Characterization of populations of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 from potato and tobacco. Phytopathology 83: 854–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (1998) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*A; and other methods). Version 4.0b8. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

  • Tu CC and Kimbrough JW (1975) A modified soil-over-culture method for inducing basidia in Thanatephorus cucumeris. Phytopathology 65: 730–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Rafalski JA and Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 6531–6535

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto DT and Uchida JY (1982) Rapid nuclear staining of Rhizoctonia solani and related fungi with acridine orange and with safranin O. Mycologia 74: 145–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XB, Berggren GT and SnowJP (1990) Types of Rhizoctonia foliar blight on soybean in Louisiana. Plant Disease 74: 501–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Kharbanda PD, Wang H and McAndrew DW (1996) Characterization, virulence, and genetic variation of Rhizoctonia solani AG-9 in Alberta. Plant Disease 80: 513–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorinori JT (1996) Cancro da haste da soja: epidemiologia e controle (75 p) Embrapa, Londrina (Circular Técnica, 14) Yorinori JT (1998) Estratégias de controle das doenças da soja. Correio Agrícola 2: 8–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chela Fenille, R., Luiz de Souza, N. & Eurya Kuramae, E. Characterization of Rhizoctonia solani Associated with Soybean in Brazil. European Journal of Plant Pathology 108, 783–792 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020811019189

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020811019189

Navigation