Skip to main content
Log in

Explaining Academic Progress via Combining Concepts of Integration Theory and Rational Choice Theory

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, elements of rational choice theory and integration theory are compared on the basis of their explanatory power to explain variance in academic progress. It is argued that both theoretical concepts could be combined. Furthermore the distinction between social and academic integration which integration theory makes is abandoned. Empirical tests, using AMOS (Analysis of Moment Structures), show that an extended model, comprising both integration and rational choice theory, provides the best explanation of academic progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arbuckle, J. L., and Wothke, W. (1995). AMOS Users' Guide Smallwaters, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M., Milem, J., and Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto's theory. J. Higher Educ. 71(5): 569-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M., Sullivan, A. S., and Johnson, R. (1997). Appraising Tinto's theory of college student departure. In: Smart, J. C. (eds.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 12), Agathon Press, New York, pp. 107-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials. Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality Soc. 9(3): 275-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. F., Castaneda, M. B., Nora, A., and Hengstler, D. (1992). The convergence between two theories of college persistence. J. Higher Educ. 63(2): 143-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., and Castaneda, M. B. (1993). College persistence. Structural equations modeling. Test of an integrated model of student retention. J. Higher Educ. 64(2): 122-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Graaf, N. D., Need, A., and Ultee, W. (2000). Levensloop en kerkverlating: Een nieuwe en overkoepelende verklaring voor enkele empirische regelmatigheden. [Life course and leaving the church: A new and comprehensive explanation for some empirical regularities]. Mens en Maatschappij 75(3): 229-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, U., Roeleveld, J., Webbink, H. D., and Verbeek, A. E. (1996). Het Amsterdamse Studieloopbaanmodel [The Amsterdam model of study careers]. (Serie verder studeren, een panelstudie onder scholieren en studenten, deel 6. Ministerie van Onderwijs Cultuur en Wetenschappen), The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, U., Sikkema, C. Y., and Dronkers, J. (1997). The Amsterdam model of study careers. Integration of human capital theory and social integration theory in explaining study careers in higher education. Paper presented at the ECSR conference Rational Action Theories in Social Analysis: Applications and New Developments, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Elster, J. (eds.) (1986). Rational Choice Blackwell, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2000). Planning for the transition to tertiary study: A literature review. J. Inst. Res. 9(1): 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (1996). Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: The case of persisting differentials in educational attainment. Br. J. Sociol. 47(3): 481-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J., and Bechger, T. M. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Fam. Sci. Rev. 11: 354-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutch Inspectorate of Education [Inspectie van het Onderwijs] (1997). Studeerbaarheid in het hoger onderwijs. [Studiability of the higher education] (Inspectierapport nr. 1997-10). Utrecht, The Netherlands.

  • Levhari, D., and Weiss, Y. (1974). The effects of risk on the investment in human capital. Am. Econ. Rev. 64: 950-963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Need, A., and De Jong, U. (2001). Educational differences in the Netherlands. Testing rational action theory. Rationality Soc. 13(1): 71-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbeek, H. (1992). Essays on Human Capital Theory Thesis, Amsterdam.

  • Pascarella, E. T., Duby, P. B., and Iverson, B. K. (1982). A test and reconceptualization of a theoretical model of college withdrawal in a commuter institution setting. Sociol. Educ. 56: 88-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1983). Predicting voluntary freshman year persistence/ withdrawal behavior in a residential university: A path analytic validation of Tinto's model. J. Educ. Psychol. 75(2): 215-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, M. E. (1998). Career decision-making self-efficacy and an integrated model of student persistence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

  • Spady, W. (1971). Dropouts from higher education: Toward an empirical model. Interchange 2: 38-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1988). Stages of student departure. Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. J. Higher Educ. 59(4): 438-455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (Rev. ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Beekhoven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beekhoven, S., De Jong, U. & Van Hout, H. Explaining Academic Progress via Combining Concepts of Integration Theory and Rational Choice Theory. Research in Higher Education 43, 577–600 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020166215457

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020166215457

Navigation