Abstract
Although most prior research on figurative language examines comprehension, several recent studies on the production of such language have proved to be informative. One of the most noticeable traits of figurative language production is that it is produced at a somewhat random rate with occasional bursts of highly figurative speech (e.g., Corts & Pollio, 1999). The present article seeks to extend these findings by observing production during speech that involves a very high base rate of figurative language, making statistically defined bursts difficult to detect. In an analysis of three Baptist sermons, burst-like clusters of figurative language were identified. Further study indicated that these clusters largely involve a central root metaphor that represents the topic under consideration. An interaction of the coherence, along with a conceptual understanding of a topic and the relative importance of the topic to the purpose of the speech, is offered as the most likely explanation for the clustering of figurative language in natural speech.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barlow, J. M., Kerlin, J. R., & Pollio, H. R. (1971). Training manual for identifying figurative language (Tech. Report No. 1). Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Metaphor Research Group.
Corts, D. P. (1999). Spontaneous production of figurative language and gestures in college lectures: A comparison across disciplines. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Corts, D. P., & Pollio, H. R. (1999). The spontaneous production of figurative language and gestures in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 81-100.
Katz, A. N. (1989). On choosing the vehicles of metaphors: Referential concreteness, semantic distances, and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 486-499.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ortony, A. (1975). Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 25, 45-53.
Pollio, H. R., & Barlow, J. M. (1975). A behavioural analysis of figurative language in psychotherapy: One session in a single case study. Language and Speech, 18, 236-254.
Pollio, H. R., Fabrizi, M. S, & Weddle, H. L. (1982). A note on pauses in spontaneous speech as a test of the derived process theory of metaphor. Linguistics, 20, 431-443.
Williams-Whitney, D., Mio, J. S., & Whitney, P. (1992). Metaphor production in creative writing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 497-509.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corts, D.P., Meyers, K. Conceptual Clusters in Figurative Language Production. J Psycholinguist Res 31, 391–408 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019521809019
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019521809019