Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal investment facing possible accidents

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the optimal behavior of a firm over time that faces the probability ofcausing an environmental disaster by its activities. Here, we can think of explosions in thechemical industry, oil tankers that lose oil, etc. In the static literature, a distinction is madebetween small firms and large firms. Small firms are called undercapitalized in the sensethat the firm cannot pay for the accident because the accidental damage exceeds the value ofthe firm. As soon as this happens, the firm is declared bankrupt. This gives an incentive tospend part of the safety budget on distributing dividends to the shareholders under the motto:pay dividends as long as it is still possible.

In this paper, we extend the static framework to a dynamic one. The major reason is tofind out under what circumstances it can be optimal for a small firm to expand in order tobecome a large firm that has the means to fully pay for the damage caused by an environmentalaccident. Admittedly, this paper is only a first step in reaching this goal. Here, wedetermine the optimal safety expenditures and the convergence behavior of long‐run investmentpolicies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.R. Beard, Bankruptcy and care choice, Rand Journal of Economics 21(1990)626-634.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Brander and B. Spencer, Moral hazard and limited liability: Implication for the theory of the firm, International Economic Review 30(1989)833-849.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Feichtinger and R.F. Hartl, Optimale Kontrolle ökonomischer Prozesse: Anwendungen des Maximumprinzips in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften, De Gruyter, Berlin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. Van Hilten, P.M. Kort and P.J.J.M. van Loon, Dynamic Policies of the Firm, Springer, Berlin, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. van 't Veld, The judgment proof opportunity, Working Paper No. 823, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley, 1997.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartl, R., Kort, P. & Novak, A. Optimal investment facing possible accidents. Annals of Operations Research 88, 99–117 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018959103471

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018959103471

Keywords

Navigation