Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An interdisciplinary approach for exploring the impact of individual characteristics in the context of GSS research

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While GSS models view individual member characteristics as explanatory variables, little research has been done to examine the impact of these variables on the group process. One explanation for this dearth of research is simply that the number of possible dimensions of individual characteristics which could be explored is extremely large. The work of mental model researchers provides an excellent starting point for more closely examining the unique knowledge, understandings and perspectives that individuals bring to the group process. In this paper, we detail and illustrate an interdisciplinary approach which addresses two significant barriers confronting GSS researchers interested in exploring this area: the extremely time consuming methodologies required to elicit and represent mental models, and the lack of a means to form groups based on the similarity of the mental models of the group members. The approach integrates theories and techniques for three different disciplines - Cognitive and Social Science, Production and Operations Management, and Operations Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Anderson, The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Axelrod, Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Bougon, K.E. Weick and D. Binkhorst, Cognition in organizations: An analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra, Administrative Science Quarterly 22(1977)606–39.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Bougon, N. Baird, J.M. Komocarand and W. Ross, Identifying strategic loops: The self-Q interviews, in: Mapping Strategic Thought, S.A. Huff, ed., Wiley, Chichester, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Bougon, Uncovering cognitive maps: the self-Q technique, in: Beyond Method: Social Research Strategies, G. Morgan, ed., Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Carley, Formalizing the social expert's knowledge, Sociological Methods and Research 17 (November 1988)165–232.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Carley, An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 12(1986)137–189.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Carley, The value of cognitive foundations for dynamic social theory, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 14(1989)171–208.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.P. Chandrasekharan and R. Rajagopalan, An ideal seed non-hierarchical clustering algorithm for cellular manufacturing, International Journal of Production Research 24(1986)451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.P. Chandrasekharan and R. Rajagopalan, GROUPABILITY: An analysis of properties of binary data matrices for group technology, International Journal of Production Research 27(1989) 1161–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Chu and M. Tsai, A comparison of three array-based clustering techniques for manufacturing cell formation, International Journal of Production Research 28(1990)1417–1433.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Cossette and M. Audet, Mapping of an idiosyncratic schema, Journal of Management Studies 29(May 1992)325–347.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Cropper, C. Eden and F. Ackermann, Keeping sense of accounts using computer-based cognitive maps, Social Science Computer Review 8(1990)345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Daniels, L. Markoczy, J. Goldberg and L. de Chernatony, Comparing cognitive maps, International Workshop on Managerial and Organizational Cognition, Brussels, Belgium, 1993.

  15. A. Dennis, J. George, L. Jessup, J. Nunamaker and D. Vogel, Information technology to support electronic meetings, MIS Quarterly 12(December 1988)591–624.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. DeSanctis and R.B. Gallupe, A foundation for the study of group decision support systems, Management Science 33(May 1987)589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Dutton J. and Dukerick, Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation, Academy of Management Journal 34(1991)517–54.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Eden, On the nature of cognitive maps, Journal of Management Studies 29(1992)261–265.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Eden, F. Ackermann and S. Cropper, The analysis of cause maps, Journal of Management Studies 29(1992)309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Eden, F. Ackermann and A. Tait, Comparing cognitive maps — methodological issues, Paper presented at the International Workshop on Managerial and Organizational Cognition, Brussels, Belgium, May 13–14, 1993.

  21. C. Eden, S. Jones and D. Sims, Messing about in Problems, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Eden, S. Jones and D. Sims, Thinking in Organizations, Macmillan, London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Ford and W.H. Hegarty, Decision makers beliefs about the causes and effects of structure: An exploratory study, Academy of Management Journal 27(1984)271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, eds., Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Glover and R. Woolsey, Converting the 0–1 polynomial programming problem to a 0–1 linear program, Operations Research 22(1974)180–182.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G.P. Huber, Issues in the design of group decision support systems, MIS Quarterly 8(September 1984)195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A.S. Huff, Mapping strategic thought, in: Mapping Strategic Thought, A.S. Huff, ed., Wiley, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. Jessup and J. Valacich, On the study of group support systems: An introduction to group support system research and development, in: Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, L. Jessup and J. Valacich, eds., Macmillan, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P.N. Johnson-Laird, Mental Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. Johnson-Laird, Mental Models, in: Foundations of Cognitive Science, M. Posner, ed., 1989.

  31. S. Kaparthi and N. Suresh, Performance of selected part-machine grouping techniques for data sets of wide ranging sizes and imperfection, Decision Sciences 25(1994)515–539.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J.R. King, Machine-component grouping in production flow analysis: An approach using a rank order clustering algorithm, International Journal of Production Research 18(1980)213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Kusiak, The generalized group technology concept, International Journal of Production Research 25(1987)561–569.

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. Kuo, F. Glover and K. Dhir, Analyzing and modeling the maximum diversity problem by zero-one programming, Decision Sciences 24(1993)1171–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  35. K. Langfield-Smith, Exploring the need for a shared cognitive map, Journal of Management Studies 29(May 1992)349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. Langfield-Smith and G. Lewis, Mapping cognitive structures: A pilot study to develop a research method, Working Paper 14, Graduate School of Management, University of Melbourne, 1989.

  37. K. Langfield-Smith and A. Wirth, Measuring differences between cognitive maps, Journal of Operational Research Society 43(1992)1135–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Laukkanen, Understanding the formation of manager's cognitive maps: A comparative case study of context in two business firm clusters, Helsinki School of Economics, A-65, 1993.

  39. M. Laukkanen, A computer method for comparative cognitive mapping, Paper presented at the International Workshop on Managerial and Organizational Cognition, Brussels, Belgium, May 13–14, 1993.

  40. L. Markoczy and J. Goldberg, A method for eliciting and comparing causal maps, Paper presented at the International Workshop on Managerial and Organizational Cognition, Brussels, Belgium, May 13–14, 1993.

  41. A.P. Massey and D.L. Clapper, Element-finding: The impact of a group support system on a crucial component of sensemaking, Jounal of Management Information Systems 11(Spring 1995)149–176.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. McGrath and A. Hollingshead, Putting the “group” back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements, in: Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, L. Jessup and J. Valacich, eds., Macmillan, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  43. P.L. McLeod and J.K. Liker, Electronic meeting systems: Evidence from a low structure environment, Information Systems Research 3(1992)195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. Miltenburg and W. Zhang, A comparative evaluation of nine well-known algorithms for solving the cell formation problem in group technology, Journal of Operations Management 10(1991) 44–72.

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. Minsky, The Society of Mind, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. Minsky, A framework for representing knowledge, in: The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  47. C.T. Mosier, An experiment investigating the application of clustering procedures and similarity coefficients to the GT machine cell formation problem, International Journal of Production Research 27(1989)1811–1835.

    Google Scholar 

  48. C.T. Mosier and L. Taube, Weighted similarity measure heuristics for the group technology machine clustering problem, OMEGA 13(1985)577–579.

    Google Scholar 

  49. G. Purcheck, A mathematical classification as a basis for design of cellular production systems, Production Engineer 54(1975)35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  50. D. Rummelhart, A problem solving schema for stories, in: Basic Processes in Reading, D. Laberge and S.J. Samuels, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  51. H. Seifoddini and P. Wolfe, Application of the similarity coefficient method in group technology, IIE Transactions 18 (1986) 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  52. M.E. Shaw, Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  53. M. Smith and B. Stewart, Repertory grids: A flexible tool for establishing the content and structure of a manager's thoughts, in: Management Bibliographies and Reviews, D. Ashton, ed., MCB Press, Bradford, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  54. G. Stasser and W. Titus, Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48(1985) 1467–1478.

    Google Scholar 

  55. G. Stasser and W. Titus, Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(1987)81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  56. I.D. Steiner, Group Process and Productivity, Academic Press, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  57. M. Turoff and S.R. Hiltz, Computer support for group vs. individual decisions, IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-30(January 1982)82–91.

  58. K. Weick and M. Bougon, Organizations as cognitive maps, in: The Thinking Organization, H. Sims and D. Gioia, eds., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  59. K. Weick and D. Meader, Sensemaking and group support systems, in: Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, L. Jessup and J. Valacich, eds., Macmillan, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Anne P. Massey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danial L. Clapper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer A. Blue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massey, A.P., Clapper, D.L. & Blue, J.A. An interdisciplinary approach for exploring the impact of individual characteristics in the context of GSS research. Annals of Operations Research 72, 75–101 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018912724659

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018912724659

Search

Navigation