Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of periodic survey designs employing multi-stage sampling

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sampling designs considered for a national scale environmental monitoring programme are compared. Specifically, design strategies designed to monitor one aspect of this environmental programme, agro-ecosystem health, are assessed. Two types of panel survey designs are evaluated within the framework of two-stage sampling. Comparisons of these designs are discussed with regard to precision, cost, and other issues that need to be considered in planning long-term surveys. To compare precision, the underlying variance of a simple estimator of mean difference is derived for each of the two designs. A variance and cost model accounting for the different rotational sampling schemes across designs are developed. Optimum stage allocation for each design are assessed with the variance-cost models. The best choice of design varied with the conditions underlying the variance model and the degree of other sources of survey error expected in the programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, M.P.F. (1986) A Comparison of Efficiencies of Longitudinal, Mixed Longitudinal, and Cross Sectional Designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 171–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W.G. (1977) Sampling Techniques. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, N. and Ware, J. (1983) Design and Analysis Methods for Longitudinal Research. Annual Review of Public Health, 4, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, J. and Nealon, J. (1987) Area Frame Design for Agricultural Surveys. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T.E. and Johnson, C.E. (1991) Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States, Mid-1970's to Mid-1980's. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 28 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Shaarawi, A.H. (1993) The Role of Environmetrics. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 8, 287–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, L.R. (1995) Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program Scaled Back. Civil and Engineering News, 18–23.

  • Fecso, R., Tortora R., and Vogel, F. (1986) Sampling frames for agriculture in the United States. Journal of Official Statistics, 2, 279–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, J.J. and Baker, H.D. (1982) The 1982 National Resources Inventory Sample Design and Estimation Procedures. US Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, 43 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R.M. (1989) Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, M. and Daly, J.F. (1965) A Multivariate Approach to Estimation in Periodic Sample Surveys. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 242–57.

  • Hansen, M.H., Hurwitz, W.N. and Madow, W.G. (1953) Sample Survey Methods and Theory-Volume II. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, E.T. and Ernst, L.R. (1981) Comparison of an alternative estimator to the current composite estimator in CPS. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, 303–08.

  • Jabine, T., King, K. and Petroni, R.J. (1990) Survey of Income and Program Participation Quality Profile, United States Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasprzyk, D., Duncan, G., Kalton, G. and Singh, M.P. (1989) Panel Surveys. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L. (1965) Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L. (1988) Multipurpose sample designs. Survey Methodology, 14, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, V.M. (1992) A comparison of periodic survey designs employing multi-stage sampling. Institute of Statistics, Mimeo Series No. 1897T, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessler, J.T. and Kalsbeek, W.D. (1992) Nonsampling Error in Surveys. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin, D. (1975) On a design problem in growth studies. Biometrics, 31, 749–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. (1934) On the two different aspects of the representative method: The method of stratified sample and the method of purposive selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 97, 558–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W.S., White, D. and Stevens, D.L. (1990) Design Report for EMAP, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. EPA/600/3-91/053. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

  • Patterson, H.D. (1950) Sampling on successive occasions with partial replacement of units. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 12, 241–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolsen, R.F. and Leeper, J.D. (1980) Growth curve analysis of complete and incomplete longitudinal data. Communications in Statistics, A9, 14, 1491–513.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lesser, V.M., Kalsbeek, W.D. A comparison of periodic survey designs employing multi-stage sampling. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4, 117–130 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018566210491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018566210491

Navigation