Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interaction of lime, organic matter and fertilizer on growth and uptake of arsenic and mercury by Zorro fescue (Vulpia myuros L.)

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine (SBMM) is an abandoned open pit mine located on the eastern shores of Clear Lake, California. Revegetation efforts have been difficult because the mine-soils at SBMM have low pH, low fertility and elevated As and Hg concentrations. In a greenhouse study, we examined the interactions of lime, N, P and OM additions with respect to plant growth, and As and Hg uptake. Three selected acidic mine-soils from the site containing high (164 mg/kg) (S-H), medium (123 mg/kg) (S-M) and low (31 mg/kg) (S-L) total As content were planted to the Eurasian annual grass, Zorro fescue (Vulpia myuros L.). The Hg concentrations for these soils varied between 1700 and 3000 mg/kg with S-L > S-H ≅ S-M. A factorial design used 3 soils, 2 lime, 2 N, 2 P and 2 OM treatments with treatments replicated three times. Multiple regression analyses indicated a strong relationship between As plant uptake, root length density (RLD) and soluble As. A highly significant linear relationship between Hg uptake and RLD for plants growing on the three soils illustrated the importance of plant root characteristics in influencing Hg uptake. Soluble As decreased in the order S-H > S-M > S-L in positive correlation with P and DOC but in inverse relationship to oxalate extractable Fe. Lime and OM additions correlated negatively with soluble Hg and Hg tissue concentration due to either Hg adsorption to OM or to inorganic surfaces. Addition of lime increased dry matter yield and Hg uptake in all three soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloway B J 1995 Heavy metals in soils. Chapman and Hall, Glasgow. 368 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloway J B and Jackson A P 1991 The behavior of heavy metals in sewage sludge-amended soils. Sci. Total Environ. 100, 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson A 1979 Mercury in soils. InThe Biogeochemistry of Mercury in the Environment. Ed. J Nriagu. pp 79–112. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber S A 1995 Soil nutrient bioavailability: A mechanistic approach. 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow N J 1974 On the displacement of adsorbed anions from soil: 2. Displacement of phosphate by arsenate. Soil Sci. 117, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow N J and Cox V C 1992 The effects of pH and chloride concentration on mercury sorption: I. By goethite. J. Soil Sci. 43, 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson N R 1953 Effect of season, phosphate and acidity on plant growth in arsenic toxic soils. Soil Sci. 76, 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop R F and Chisholm D 1962 Arsenic accumulation in Annapolis Valley orchard soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 42, 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn H L, McNeal B L and O'Connor G A 1979 Soil Chemistry. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford G R, Chang A C, Page A L, Bakhtar D and Frampton J A 1996. Background concentrations of trace and major elements in California soils. Kearney Foundation Special Report.

  • Bradshaw A D and Chadwick A D 1980 The restoration of land. Studies in ecology, volume 6. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocking D, Rohrer M and Ward T R D 1995 Effects of root morphology and Hg concentration in the soil on uptake by terrestrial vascular plants. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 80, 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham S D and Ow D W 1996 Promises and prospects of phytoremediation. Plant Physiol. 110, 715–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren R A, Percival H J and Parfitt R L 1997 Carbon dioxide effects on soil solutions collected by centrifugation. Soil Sci. 162, 648–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport J R and Peryea F J 1991 Phosphate fertilizers influence leaching of lead and arsenic in a soil contaminated with lead arsenate. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 57, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis D R, Beckett P H T and Wollan E 1978 Critical levels of twenty potentially toxic elements in young barley. Plant Soil 49, 395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean L A and Rubins E J 1947 Anion exchange in soils. I. Exchangeable phosphorous and anion exchange capacity. Soil Sci. 63, 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Itri F M 1972 The Environmental Mercury Problem. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll C T 1984 A procedure for the fractionation of aqueous aluminum in dilute acidic waters. Inter. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 16, 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury W H and Nisbet 1973 Succession J.Arnold Arboretum 54, 331–368. Fageria N K, Zimmermann F J P and Baligar V C 1995 Lime and phosphorus interactions on growth and nutrient uptake by upland rice, wheat, common bean and corn in an Oxisol. J. Plant Nutr. 18, 2519-2532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina M P W, Sumner M E, Plank C O and Letzsch W S 1980 Exchangeable aluminum and pH as indicators of lime requirement for corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 1036–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen D K, Miller M H and Juo S R 1980 Liming and limephosphorus-zinc interactions in two Nigerian Ultisols: II. Effects on maize root and shoot growth. Soil Sci. Sci. Am. J. 44, 1227–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee G W and Bauder J W 1986 Particle-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods - Agronomy Monograph no. 9 (2nd edn). Ed. A Klute. pp 383–411. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geelhoed J S, Hiemstra T and Riemsdijk W H V 1998 Competitive interaction between phosphate and citrate on goethite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 2119–2123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaubig R A and Goldberg S 1988 Determination of inorganic arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) using automated hydride-generation atomic-absorption spectrometry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 536–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gracey H I and Stewart J W B 1974 The fate of applied mercury in soil In Proc. Int. Conf. on Land Waste Manage., Oct. 1973. Ed. J Tomlinson. pp 97–103. Agric. Inst. of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haering K C, Daniels W L and Roberts J A 1993 Changes in mine soil properties resulting from overburden weathering. J. Environ. Qual. 22, 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeraman D A, Claassen V P and Zasoski R J 1996 Plant uptake and distribution of mercury and arsenic in mine impacted soils. American Society of Agronomy Meetings Abstracts, Indianapolis, Indiana.

  • Hogg T J, Bettany J R and Stewart J W B 1978 The uptake of 203Hg-labeled mercury compounds by bromegrass from irrigated undisturbed soil columns. J Environ. Qual. 7, 445–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janitzky P 1986 Cation exchange capacity. In Field and Laboratory Procedures Used in a Soil Chromosequence Study. Eds. M J Singer and P Janitzky. pp 21–23. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1648. Johnston S E and W M Barnard 1979 Comparative effectiveness of fourteen solutions for extracting arsenic from four western New York soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43: 304-308.

  • Johnson C D and J G Skousen 1995 Minesoil properties of 15 abandoned mine land sites in west Virginia. J. Environ. Qual. 24, 635–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C A, Inskeep WP and Neuman D R 1997 Arsenic transport in contaminated mine tailings following liming. J. Environ. Qual. 26, 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis L 1941 Accumulation of arsenic in the shoots of sudan grass and bush beans. Plant Physiol. 16, 521–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat A J and McNeill J 1994 Reclaiming disturbed land for forestry. Bulletin 110. HMSO, London. 112 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshower F F 1994 Practical handbook of disturbed land revegetation. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. 265 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson D W and Sommers L E 1982 Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties - Agronomy Monograph no. 9 (2nd edn). Ed. A Klute. pp 539–577. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramulu U S S, Pratt P F and Page A L 1967 Phosphorus fixation by soils in relation to extractable iron oxides and mineralogical composition. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 31, 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross G J and Wang C 1993 Extractable Al, Fe, Mn and Si. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Ed. MR Carter. pp 239–245. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq M 1986 Solubility relationships of arsenic in calcareous soils and its uptake by corn. Plant Soil 91, 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah R N and Miller R O 1992 Spontaneous reaction for acid dissolution of biological tissue in closed vessels. Anal. Chem. 64, 230–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal S M, Siegal B Z, Barghigiani C, Aratini K, Penny P and Penny D 1987 A contribution to the environmental biology of mercury accumulation in plants. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 33, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S M, Siegel B Z, Puerner N, Speitel T and Thorarinsson F 1975 Water and soil biotic relations in mercury distribution. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 4, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotton D G, Reuter J E and Goldman C R 1995 Mercury uptake patterns of biota in a seasonally anoxic northern California reservoir. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 80, 841–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smucker A J M, McBurney S L and Srivastava A K 1982 Quantitative separation of roots from compacted soil profiles by the hydroneumatic elutriation system. Agron. J. 74, 500–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R R and Rohlf F 1981 Biometry.WH Freeman and Company, New York. 2nd edn. 859 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks D L 1995 Environmental soil chemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. 267 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT for Windows: Statistics, Version 5 Edition 1992 Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc. 750 p.

  • Stewart J and Smith E S 1921 Some relations of arsenic to plant growth: Part 2. Soil Sci. 16, 199–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanabalasingam P and Pickering W F 1986 Arsenic sorption by humic acids. Environ. Pollut. 12, 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdale S L, Nelson W L and Beaton J D 1985 Soil fertility and fertilizers. 4th edn. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1994 Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study: Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine Superfund Site. August 1994.

  • Wild A 1988 Russell's Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. 11th edn. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolson E A, Axley J H and Kearney P C 1973 The chemistry and phytotoxcity of arsenic in soils. II. Effects of Time and Phosphorus Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Allard B and Grimvall A 1991 Effects of acidification and natural organic materials on the mobility of arsenic in the environment. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 58, 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y, Allen H E, Li Y, Huang C P and Sanders P F 1996 Adsorption of mercury (II) by soil: Effects of pH, chloride and organic matter. J. Environ. Qual. 2, 83–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zasoski R J and Burau R G 1977 A rapid nitric-perchloric acid digestion method for multi-element tissue analysis. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 8, 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beak International Incorporated, Brampton, Ontario, Canada, L6T 5B7

    D.A. Heeraman & V.P. Claassen

  2. Soils and Biogeochemistry, Dept. of LAWR, Univ. of California, Davis, 95616, USA

    R.J. Zasoski

Authors
  1. D.A. Heeraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V.P. Claassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R.J. Zasoski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heeraman, D., Claassen, V. & Zasoski, R. Interaction of lime, organic matter and fertilizer on growth and uptake of arsenic and mercury by Zorro fescue (Vulpia myuros L.). Plant and Soil 234, 215–231 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017995201694

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017995201694

Search

Navigation